And you are embarrassing yourself talking about an outdated topic that was talked about last year or two years ago. Using offensive language and this whole dream scenario of should have, would have, could have I think is something you probably like to do in your free time but I do not. Well, guess what, keep him for another year and he still would be a Free agent. I merely stated he tweeted about being a star and wanted more money than the Rockets could clearly give. You can fantasize about him being enough to make us competitive against the Warrior and him actually being healthy last year. I prefer about talking Rockets issues that happens this year. I can live with being illogical rather being a sentimental, descending human being.
Whats the point of this reply? What was the point of any of your replies to me if this is not the type of subject you want to talk about? I didn't ask for you to respond. I think you are the one embarrassed that's why you responded with a mini temper tantrum. At least you admit you're illogical I guess that's a step in the right direction. I am being condescending toward you because you were being ignorant while calling me ignorant, so yeah condescension deserved.
Why does this fallacy keep repeated time and again on this site? As far as I remember and even Clutch insinuated this - Parsons and his agent had a stipulation that if we landed Dwight, Parsons would be free of his final year to go pursue the best deal. That's all there is to it.
Yep. And the whole "if he would've stayed another year, maybe ___ would've happened and we could've afforded to keep him" stuff is jibberish. The only thing that would lower his value is 1) horrible injury or 2) horrible play. Both of which would hurt the team. It is unimportant (from the Rockets standpoint) which year we let him take offers. Morey wasn't going to overpay for a role player unless he had his Big 3 (in this case Harden, Howard, Bosh). Parsons was not going to stay in Houston.
I only deal with the facts that I know. In other words you saying Clutch "insinuated" something doesn't equal that insinuation being fact. What I do know is that we didn't have to make Parsons a free agent. I remember "speculation" on the matter but no concrete fact. When you provide some proof then I'll agree that what I said was fallacy. Until then you cannot claim something is a fallacy without having known the actual fact.
"I'm getting tired of Parsons, what you are trying to say we should ve kept him one more year, and this year he still would be a free agent(not injured) and have gone to another team, if u like him follow him on the Mavs, this is reality- daywalker" The above message was left for reputation. I guess he was trying to negative rep me, lol. Anyway a message to daywalker. I don't care who you're tired of. Again if you do not like talking about Parsons then block me. Block me please I don't care. I'm not here to cater to your emotional breakdowns. Thanks for the rep though, lol.
