dont pay him no mind... there are about a half dozen homer harden nuthuggers who have no concept of team basketball... just ppg... he's one of the worst. They are worse than the LOFs...
Just so your bs claim can kinda be true... Harden averages the most points per game of any Rocket ever. This makes him the best Rocket ever. Spoiler
well it used to be 'global warming'... Gore got a Nobel prize for saying the earth is getting hotter and going to burn up... then it was proven wrong (look 'its snowing') and it was proven the planets not burning up but rather more severe highs and lows... so now its 'climate change'... jus sayin...
Not exactly. The planet IS becoming warmer which is increasing the temperature of the oceans which is increasing potential energy for more precipitation in the form of rain AND snowfall. Anyways, this a stupid tangent. There is a 4 percentage point difference in Harden's fg%(not efg% or tfg%, but raw fg%) between wins and loses. Hey, maybe it's just mere coorelation rather than causation but a 4 percentage point difference is significant. To believe that raw fg% doesn't matter at all is just asinine.
^^ Ahahaha do you not even realize that guy is on your side . Or do you just try to pick an argument with everyone ?
I was replying to his 'global warming' statement. My latter statement regarding Harden's fg% was in regards to your ilk.
Dude obviously there is a correlation between fg % and winning . Harden being our best and most important player his also holds true for him . That's like saying there's a correlation between scoring more points than the other team and winning , it's blatantly obvious. I have no idea what kind of argument you are trying to make and also you edited your post .
So what you are stating is that shooting inefficiently from the field which can be determined by raw fg% is a detriment to the team!?!?! Wow, it was like your ilk stated that raw fg% isn't significant!
The thing that you aren't grasping is that FG % isn't the best indicator of efficiency. Stats like TS and EFG measure that better. Every single NBA front office gives more weight to those measures when evaluating players. FG% is what it is. If you drive to the lane 12 times and get fouled 10 and miss both of your " recorded " attempts then your FG% is 0 . Which if you use only FG % shows a bad game. However stats that factor in ft can more accurately show how efficient a player was. But i like how excited you were.
I wasn't really singling you out mate. It's just annoying that everyone finds a way to turn any thread into a b**** fest. Harden has been awesome since I made this thread, he's brought intensity, lowered turnovers and played within the offense more. It's great to see
