Because my observations regarding this topic have been scattered over many threads over many months, I decided that today I would give it focus. More importantly, today I had time for it.
Years from now, the history books will praise "thumbs" for his scholarly research and conclusions. Right texxx?
Sick timing, "bruh." (I'm sure you're used to your buddy responding to you like this) Really though, it's a bit inappropriate to throw your libel around today, isn't it? Your so-called "points" are in no way substantiated. Even if I didn't read through them, why would it matter to you if Obama were a Muslim? I'm sure you didn't care that your homie Mitt was a Mormon, right? Go to bed, "brah."
First, being identified as a Muslim, albeit correctly, can, in no way, be considered libel. Second, Mormons, in general, are really nice people. I make the observation because Obama has lied about his motivations during his presidency.
What an impossible statement. Good luck defending this stupid assertion. Bring the evidence. . . . (Taking out your a$$. . . . Easy pickings. . . .)
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. All the first nine of so pages was the prologue in support of the conclusion, i.e., his true motivation.
Unfortunately, the prince and I do not travel in the same circles. The Methodist may have been keeping the sweetest suites for the creme de la creme of world society. :grin:
