Nasty Hops with attitude. I'd take him over Marbury every day of the week. I thinke he's a leader too.
you'll take robinson over marbury any day of the week???? wow....that may be the dumbest statement i've heard in awhile. i'm not saying marbury is the greatest PG ever but he's been putting up 20 & 8 his entire career. and robinson goes games without a single assist and has a very low shooting % and you'll take him over a proven all-star because he has nice hops and is a somehow a proven "leader" as a rookie??? wow....
Nate will be the starting point guard in New York by the All Star break, if New York can find a team to take Stephan "I am the greatest but my teams always suck" Marbury. Sereously, offer up a capable center, or a long, good power foward, or a couple of number one draft picks and Steph and his contract are long gone.
there are knicks fans here in nyc that want to get rid of marbury so nate robinson can play more minutes.
Yeah, I wanted to say what JRazz said but didn't have the guts to. I figured I'd hear it over what I posted and sure enough............... Frankly, there's a lot of PGs that'd I'd take over Marbury. I think he is that bad on a team. I don't care how much talent he has, he can't win ballgames by himself. He's a horrid team basketball player, maybe the worst in the league. He should be playing with Lenny Cooke.
It's amazing. One dunk, or series of dunks, and people think a player is all-world and would take them over established superstars. Amare throws down a few dunk and suddenly he could handle Charles Barkley. Amazing.
