1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Explaining the Celtics/Nets Trade and How the Celtics Just Became 2014 Free Agency Players

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Sydeffect, Jul 17, 2013.

  1. Sydeffect

    Sydeffect Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    5,919
    Likes Received:
    442
    Got this great piece of Reddit, thought it might interest you folks.
    Credits to /u/dangercart

    http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1igbmp/explaining_the_celticsnets_trade_in_1000_easy/

    Beware, HUGE Wall of Text incoming

    This conversation started over[1] on /r/capology[2] and then continued[3] on /r/bostonceltics[4] but I thought it was interesting enough to call up to The Association. Some real experts on this stuff have written for HoopsWorld[5] and ShamSports[6] on this trade, too.
    The Celtics/Nets trade may be one of the most complicated in NBA history but is also a really good study in how a smart front office can use the CBA to their advantage. Everyone focused on the draft picks in this trade but it turns out that the way the Celtics have positioned themselves for next year's free agent class might be just as important. Here's a break-down of what exactly happened in this trade. How did the Celtics end up with a big trade exception? Why did D.J. White appear in the trade at the last minute? Read on to find out...

    Important Concepts

    The NBA doesn't always consider a trade to be a single transaction. Trades can be simultaneous[7] or non-simultaneous[8] , and a single trade can be treated one way for one team and the other for the other team within a single trade.
    When a team trades a minimum salary player[9] , only the portion of the salary paid by the team is counted and that salary only counts for the "outgoing" team but not the "incoming" team. That means minimum contracts can be used to get to a "salary match" because they only count for one side of the trade equation.

    A free agent who made under $1.2M in the prior season that is included in a trade as a sign-and-trade player only counts half of their salary when trying to reach a salary match. This is known as a base year compensation[10] player.
    Trade kickers[11] have to be salary matched by teams accepting the player but the kicker does not count for the team trading the player away.
    Teams under the luxury tax have different trade rules than taxpaying teams and the rules are dependent on the size of the trade.

    What Went Down

    The Celtics and Nets decided they wanted to make a trade built around Pierce and KG. The Celtics made the Nets agree to take on Jason Terry's contract but the Nets really only had a few players they could include from their end. The problem was that the Nets are above the cap so they can only take in contracts equaling 125% + $100,000 of what they are planning on receiving. Also, Jason Terry had a trade kicker that made him more expensive for the Nets to receive by $400k/year.

    Nets Get Salary
    Paul Pierce $15,333,334
    Kevin Garnett $12,433,735
    Jason Terry (w/ trade kicker) $5,625,313
    Total $33,392,382

    To match this, the Nets would have to send out at least $26,633,906 in salaries because the Nets are over (way, way over[12] ) the luxury tax. However, all the Nets had that the C's were willing to take was:

    Celtics Get Salary

    Kris Humphries $12,000,000
    Gerald Wallace $10,105,855
    MarShon Brooks $1,210,080
    Kris Joseph $788,872
    Total $24,104,807

    The Nets were $2,529,099 short. However, they had the rights to one Keith Bogans. Bogans only made the veteran's minimum last year which means if he were included in a sign-and-trade his contract would only count for half in the trade. This is to keep teams from gaming the system because it's expensive. The Celtics apparently didn't care because they just signed Bogans to twice the amount the Nets were short: $5,058,198. This made the trade valid from the Nets perspective, and that's all that really mattered.

    Nets Get Salary
    Paul Pierce $15,333,334
    Kevin Garnett $12,433,735
    Jason Terry $5,625,313
    Total $33,392,382

    Celtics Get:
    Keith Bogans: $2,529,099
    Kris Humphries: $12,000,000
    Gerald Wallce: $10,105,855
    MarShon Brooks: $1,210,080
    Kris Joseph: $788,872
    Total $26,633,906

    Now that the trade was valid, the Celtics could break it up into multiple trades that give them the greatest benefit, even though it has to be viewed as a single trade by the Nets. Knowing that, the C's went to work.

    First, minimum salary players never need a salary match so they traded nothing for Kris Joseph and then waived him. His salary only mattered to the Nets for contract matching purposes.

    Nets Get Salary
    Nothing
    TOTAL $0

    Celtics Get:
    Kris Joseph $788,872

    Next, the Celtics tried to put together the most beneficial multi-player trade possible. This is important because they could only get a trade exception from a trade where they only send one player so it was important that they preserve the largest contract possible for that purpose.

    Originally, the plan was to trade Pierce and Terry for Humphries, Wallace and Brooks.

    Nets Get Salary
    Paul Pierce $15,333,334
    Jason Terry (w/o trade kicker)
    MarShon Brooks $1,210,080
    TOTAL $20,558,334

    Celtics Get:
    Kris Humphries $12,000,000
    Gerald Wallace $10,105,855
    MarShon Brooks $1,210,080
    TOTAL $23,315,935

    This would have worked fine, and left KG for creating a nice exception, but wasn't ideal. It would be better to include KG instead of Pierce but each trade has to be legal for the Celtics and that means they can only accept $5,000,000 more what they're sending out and with KG's smaller salary they didn't quite make it because $12,433,735 + $5225000 +$5,000,000 = $22,658,735 which is less than the salaries of Humphries, Wallace and Brooks.

    Enter D.J. White. White has a league minimum, non-guaranteed contract. Minimum contracts only count for the outgoing team's salary so the Celtics could add him to any of their trades without the Nets having to add any more salary of their own. The Celtics were going to waive White, anyway, so instead they added him to Garnett and Terry to get over the salaries of Humphries, Wallace and Brooks. This only works because the Celtics are currently under the luxury tax. If they were over they could only accept 125% + $100,000 of outgoing salaries and they would have been $37,100 short. Instead, a trade of under $19.6M for a tax paying team is a match if the teams are within $5M, which they now just barely were.

    Nets Get Salary
    Kevin Garnett $12,433,735
    Jason Terry $5,225,000
    DJ White $884,293
    TOTAL $18,543,028


    Celtics Get:
    Kris Humphries $12,000,000
    Gerald Wallace $10,105,855
    MarShon Brooks $1,210,080
    TOTAL $23,315,935

    The teams were then left with Pierce and Bogans. The Celtics can make the trade because, from their perspective, they're sending out more than they receive in contracts and that's always allowed. Because the Celtics are only including one player in this trade, they receive a trade exception for the difference.

    Nets Get Salary
    Paul Pierce $15,333,334
    TOTAL $15,333,334

    Celtics Get:
    Keith Bogans $5,058,198
    Trade Exception $10,275,136
    TOTAL $15,333,334

    So? What Does That Do?

    This trade exception expires on 7/12/14. The signing moratorium ends on 7/10/14. Keith Bogans' contract is completely non-guaranteed for 2014-15. This means that, during the moratorium at the beginning of next year's free agent period, the Celtics could arrange a trade, or a sign-and-trade, for over $10M without sending any guaranteed contracts back plus they have Bogans' "super expiring" for over $5M more. They could throw in some of their many draft picks to entice a team to agree to a sign-and-trade if they get a free agent to agree to sign in Boston. They could take someone else's expiring contract. They could help someone get below the luxury tax. They only have a few days to work with, but the Celtics not only picked up three draft picks (and the right to swap another) to build the future, they also made themselves real players in next year's free agent super class, if they want to be one.
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. markusbrutus

    markusbrutus Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    431
    Likes Received:
    12
    interesting read.... thanks
     
  3. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,046
    Who wants to play in Boston with Rondo and nobody? Melo and Lebron are really the only two unrestricted superstar quality free agents and neither is going to Boston. Everyone else is either getting old, not a superstar, or restricted. That trade exception is nice I'd bet that's more likely to get them draft picks in a salary dump than a core star level player. They have themselves Ina nice position to accumulate pieces but the free agency angle is way overrated. Even the Rockets needed the star player first before landing the big free agent. Rondo is not that guy.
     
  4. meh

    meh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    15,379
    Likes Received:
    2,247
    Next year's FA sucks big time. I'm so glad we got Howard this offseason, partially because I actually didn't want the Rockets to roll over their capspace for next year.

    Every young RFA will likely be retained for the max by their own team or traded mid-season: Wall, George, Monroe, Cousins. And UFAs are basically Lebron, Melo, and a bunch of really old guys like Pau Gasol. Seriously?

    The Celtics are just tanking for the sake of tanking.
     
  5. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    I'm going to have to admit, this whole thing reeks of the DUST chip thing all over again.

    For those who don't remember, DUST refers to the Dallas Mavericks and Erick Dampier. The last year of Dampier's admittedly ludicrous deal was completely unguaranteed, meaning that Dallas was fully capable of trading Dampier's "contract" for another high-salaried player.

    Now, on one hand, Dallas eventually used DUST to trade for Tyson Chandler, which ended very well for them. On the other hand, DUST's unguaranteed year was for 2010-11.... meaning that Dallas fans for a large chunk of the 2009-10 season were proclaiming how DUST, combined with super attractive young propsect Rodrigue Beaubois ( where is he now?) would get them one of the elite 2010 free agents, most particularly Mr. James. And we know in retrospect that Lebron going to Dallas at all through said avenue was completely laughable. I also think that the Dwight Howard saga also showed that while it's one thing for trade exception and sign and trades to get great players who are currently under contract, it doesn't really work for free agents, as we now know that Golden State actually was never a serious contender for Dwight.

    tl;dr? Don't get your hopes up Celtics fans. Most TE don't get anything back. You want another example, take the massive TE Cleveland got for sign and trading James to Miami.
     
  6. basketballholic

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    17,516
    Likes Received:
    4,170
    That trade exception is enough for Lin or Asik...even next season.
     
  7. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    23,939
    Likes Received:
    14,009
    And Boston is a team that values players similarly to the Rockets.
     
  8. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    34,118
    Likes Received:
    13,521
    And they would give us...?
     
  9. Dutchrudder!

    Dutchrudder! Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    115
    Keith Bogans, recipient of 1 Defensive Player of the Year vote in 2011. What more could you ask for?
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,577
    Likes Received:
    35,648
    Free Agency 2014. The Big Elephant in the room is exactly what "meh" said.

    ALL RFAs will be retained. The OLDER UFAs are not going to leave to go to the Lakers mess.

    The MEDIA will throw out all of these names, but it's fools gold.
     
  11. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    34,118
    Likes Received:
    13,521
    He's getting $5+ million (lol). They can probably trade him straight-up for Asik without dipping into their TPE!
     
  12. Dutchrudder!

    Dutchrudder! Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    115
    But with Bogans, we would have the 1st and 19th (tie) best defensive players of the year 2011 according to the media! That's a really stacked team if you think about it. Throw in Asik and we will be a top 5 defense!
     
  13. Sydeffect

    Sydeffect Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    5,919
    Likes Received:
    442
    Maybe we can win the 2011 championship!
     
  14. Dedicatedrocket

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    3
    all you really need to read is lt paragraph
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now