Conservatives love babies

[Carl Herrera]

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...erican-values/

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...erican-values/

Except them colored ones...

[tmoney1101]

Man who fathered 30 kids says he needs a break—on child support


And you thought Octomom had her hands full—a Tennessee man who has fathered 30 children is asking the courts for a break on child support.
Desmond Hatchett, 33, of Knoxville has children with 11 different women, reports WREG-TV.

The state already takes half his paycheck and divides it up, which doesn't amount to much when Hatchett is making only minimum wage. Some of the moms receive as little as $1.49 a month. The oldest child is 14 years old.

Hatchett explains how he reached such a critical mass: He had four kids in the same year. Twice.

Back in 2009 when Hatchett was in court to answer charges that many of the mothers were not receiving child support, he had 21 children. At the time, he said he was not going to father any more kids, but he ended up having nine more in the past three years.

The state cannot order Hatchett to stop making babies. He hasn't broken any laws, according to the report.

http://www.yahoo.com/_ylt=Apa3ucHP76...140439765.html



mane!!

[Carl Herrera]

Yep. Them immigrants destroying 'Mer'can values.

[Sweet Lou 4 2]

At least we know in 20 years the Republican party of today will be gone. All the anti-gay stupidity, all this insane hate for immigrants and the poor will finally be over as the party has to become less radical to have any semblance of power.

[Hightop]

Originally Posted by Sweet Lou 4 2 At least we know in 20 years the Republican party of today will be gone. All the anti-gay stupidity, all this insane hate for immigrants and the poor will finally be over as the party has to become less radical to have any semblance of power.

True Conservatives hate power.

[mc mark]

Originally Posted by Hightop True Conservatives hate power.

so young

[pouhe]

Originally Posted by Sweet Lou 4 2 At least we know in 20 years the Republican party of today will be gone. All the anti-gay stupidity, all this insane hate for immigrants and the poor will finally be over as the party has to become less radical to have any semblance of power.

Gay rights might be settled; but insecure, isolated, middle-class white people aren't going anywhere soon.

[RocketMan Tex]

Originally Posted by pouhe Gay rights might be settled; but insecure, isolated, middle-class white people who are terrified of blacks and Mexican-Americans aren't going anywhere soon.

Fixed it for ya!

[glynch]

Originally Posted by Hightop True Conservatives hate power.

Got to wuv him.

[glynch]

Originally Posted by pouhe Gay rights might be settled; but insecure, isolated, middle-class white people aren't going anywhere soon.

True, they can always blame immigrants, folks with advanced degrees or long for the imagined good life of the 18yh century frontier. If they are young healthy and feel that they are smarter than the average bear, there is also libertarianism which promises utopia and an end to their economic troubles if only it is tried.

It will be a long slow slog, perhaps for another lost generation, for life experience to undo the spin the billionaire think tanks have inculcated.

[Commodore]

why do you persist in attributing a single person's argument to an entire group of people?

Why not debate the arguments themselves?

[Carl Herrera]

Originally Posted by Commodore why do you persist in attributing a single person's argument to an entire group of people? Why not debate the arguments themselves?

Because it is shared by many among you people?

[Northside Storm]

Originally Posted by Commodore why do you persist in attributing a single person's argument to an entire group of people? Why not debate the arguments themselves?

The arguments themselves?

LOL

let's start with this

[Commodore]

Originally Posted by Carl Herrera Because it is shared by many among you people?

So there is data that shows many conservatives don't like colored babies or immigrants?

[Northside Storm]

Originally Posted by Commodore So there is data that shows many conservatives don't like colored babies or immigrants?

Judging by the policies the GOP advocates, yes.

[Classic]

Originally Posted by Northside Storm The arguments themselves? LOL let's start with this ]

I've seen this before, what is being defined as federal spending here?

[fchowd0311]

Originally Posted by Commodore So there is data that shows many conservatives don't like colored babies or immigrants?

Is that like a serious question?

[Sweet Lou 4 2]

I think states should no longer get free hand outs. That is...get no more federals dollars than they contribute. Why should I pay for bigtexxs nice highway so he can drive 50 miles to work when My street has potholes on it just because I take the subway???

[Northside Storm]

Originally Posted by Classic I've seen this before, what is being defined as federal spending here?

Most probably---

The monitoring of federal spending and taxation and its variation between states in the United States began in 1977 under a query run by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Democratic senator of New York. The query was designed to determine whether the state of New York was paying more in taxes than it was receiving in federal spending. The determination is made by looking at an individual state’s balance of payments (BOP), which is total income minus outlays. Initially, many thought New York was a net gainer, receiving more funding than it was paying out in taxes, because of large payments to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, but in actuality, those payments were interest payments on the United States federal debt, which were distributed to foreign individuals and governments for purchasing of US Treasury Bonds (Leonard and Walder, Page 9). After separating those expenditures from actual expenditures in New York, it was found that the state was actually a donor. This event stimulated more controversy over the topic of spending and taxation. After the Federal Community Services Administration noticed the flaw in the balance of payments in New York, they revised its data and provided the revised data under the title, The Geographical Distribution of Federal Expenditures, which was used in determining the expenditures for this analysis. This is now entitled: "the Fisc".

[Batman Jones]

Originally Posted by glynch Got to wuv him.

I wuv having him on ignore, a distinction belonging only to him. It wasn't because he was the most annoying, most consistently lame in his arguments, most stubborn (never a thread under 50 pages it seems and half the posts are his), or even the nastiest poster. Those awards go to SwolyD, bigtexxx, giddyup and basso, of course. But hightop is special. And it was upsetting to read the thoughts of a poster even bitterer than I. I hadn't thought that possible and it really shone a light in my bed. He taught me by example, I hope, to check myself before I wreck myself. Because he is a hot mess.