We can try to lose this season for the future. Our home baby Gibson will bring us Championship together with TMac, Yao, Swift and Head!
What a great idea! Let's tank the season less than 15 games into it for an inknown commodity! Not smart.
When only one person gets the great idea, no wonder the others will regard this ONLY smart as idiot, just because they don't understand. What a pity, but this is life.
I hope you fall down and break an ankle! That way, next year I can laugh at you for walking funny. Of course, if you don't like that idea, that's your loss since I'm the ONLY smart one. Pain rules! Casts rule! Crutches rule!
Tanking a season, this early into it, will waste a year's growth and learning of the team....likely for nothing in return. You have the mindset of a quiter. Were you around last season?
What a great idea! Let's tank the season less than 15 games into it for an inknown commodity! Not smart.
What an excellent idea! Let's tank the season less than 15 games into it for an unknown commodity! Smart you are not.
LMAO! Is this the new catch phrase now of the BBS? Kinda like the "Sura faints" thing? That **** is funny to me...
What a great idea! Let's tank the season less than 15 games into it for an unknown commodity! Not smart....no, really dumb!! D R
i agree that gibson would be a great pick for us. also, what is all of this talk about tanking? explain to me how we would have a worse record if we were trying to lose.
I think that what would not be a bad idea at all and would be construed as being in the general realm of positive is if the Rockets refused to allow themselves to score more points than other teams in the large majority of games this season, particularly if the season was over 65 games away from the number that is played total, that being 82. And what would make this an idea that leans away from being bad and would fall into a category of somewhat good is if they did this for a commodity for whom the predictability of future success would be a difficult task. Overall, weighing this with great consideration, I would say that this line of thinking would have to veer somewhat away from what reasonable fans would call intelligent, and by default could actually be termed "the antonym of smart." More or less.
