1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. Watching NBA Action
    It's Shai vs. Luka as the Mavericks try to even the series in OKC. Come join Clutch as we're watching NBA playoff action live!

    LIVE: NBA Playoffs!
    Dismiss Notice

Consolation Playoffs for the Draft Order

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by airbulllard, Feb 13, 2015.

  1. airbulllard

    airbulllard Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    14
    I do not like the way the NBA's playoff system is currently set up. The top 8 teams from each conference gets to play for the NBA championship. Luckily there is news now that Adam Silver wants top 16 teams regardless of conference, and that's great.

    However, there are then still 14 NBA teams that do nothing after the regular season is over. In fact, many non-playoff teams have already checked out for the season once their chances of playoff contention is either slim or gone. They have an incentive to be terrible to increase their lottery chances.

    Star players on those non-playoff teams take games off (Melo), shut it down for the season (Melo), and play meaningless games and are a waste of time (Knicks), unless they happen to be playing a playoff team fighting for seeding. Unfair for us as fans, especially the season ticket holders.

    My proposal would be to have the 14 non-playoff teams fight for something, to continue to compete, and put out a good product. I wish there was a relegation system in the NBA, like in European soccer leagues, where the worst teams will get dropped into a lower division, and lower division teams can be promoted to higher division leagues for their success. However, that kind of system will never work in America for several reasons (e.g. NBA draft instead of teams being able to sign whoever they want, the big money associated with NBA franchise ownership, etc). Owners will never go for relegation because of the hit to their wallets.

    So, how else do we get these 14 non-playoff teams to fight for something? How about the 14 non-playoff teams play a 14 team playoff, with the winner getting the 1st overall pick in the draft? The 2nd place team in this consolation bracket can get the 2nd pick, and so on. Since 3rd and 4th place teams will not have played each other, those picks can be based on a different tie breaker, like point differential throughout the playoffs or something. Same tie breakers for 5th and 6th, 7th and 8th, etc etc.

    Here's what the seedings would look like as it stands today.

    [​IMG]

    I think the first and second rounds can all be played at one neutral site over a weekend, with a one game elimination. Third and fourth rounds can be best of 3. I think a shorter series keeps things interesting w/ a 'anything can happen' scenario in play. Third and fourth rounds can be played at the participating teams' venues, to create a home court advantage for higher seeded teams.

    I wouldn't mind watching even these crappy teams play for a purpose, and maybe the NBA can sell this consolation playoff series to some random TV channels to create more content and revenue.

    I think the prize of getting the #1 pick in the draft, or even finishing as well as possible in the consolation bracket is enough incentive to keep players from taking the year off.

    I also don't think teams that have stars injured should get such a high chance of winning the lottery for just sucking that one year (i.e. Tim Duncan being drafted by Spurs because Robinson was injured, and the spurs tanked). This should help that, since essentially, the BEST of the non-playoff teams will be rewarded with the 1st overall pick.

    I understand that star players could still technically rest until the consolation playoffs start, so it's not going to solve that problem. But at least we could increase the number of watchable games in the postseason. And maybe some of the teams will play harder for a better seeding.

    Fight for your draft order...
     
  2. Texanasiafan

    Texanasiafan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2013
    Messages:
    7,003
    Likes Received:
    2,812
    No one wants to watch NIT when there is March Madness going on.

    And when CBS is carrying NCAA tourney, they sure will not want to carry NIT at the same time.
     
  3. Clutch

    Clutch Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    22,660
    Likes Received:
    31,896
    I don't think players on the teams care much about where the organization picks in the draft, especially since the higher up they pick, the more likely they could get replaced. Injuries during this consolation bracket would create a big debate also.
     
  4. don grahamleone

    don grahamleone Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,384
    Likes Received:
    33,543
    What a great idea.

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,434
    Likes Received:
    15,869
    This gives a middle-tier organization incentive to tank. For example, there's no way Phoenix this year is winning the NBA title, even if they make the playoffs as the #8 seed. But they could certainly easily win the #1 overall pick by intentionally missing the playoffs.

    Beyond that, the whole reason that reverse draft orders exists is that the NBA *wants* the worst teams to get the best new players. This does exactly the opposite of what the NBA (and every other league) wants.
     
  6. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,280
    Likes Received:
    9,632
    The teams that suck are trying, but they just suck.
     
  7. Thefabman

    Thefabman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,945
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    just give the worst team record wise like 50 balls and the 14th worst team 64, 2 having 52 balls, 3 53 balls and so on...or some sort of scale like this. This gives all the teams an equal chance at a good pick and takes away the incentive to tank.
     
  8. heypartner

    heypartner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 1999
    Messages:
    62,576
    Likes Received:
    56,317
    airbulllard,

    Even if the Silver agrees with your idea, anything that requires veteran players to play more games requires approval of the Player's Union and a vote of Owners, because it would change the CBA.

    It won't happen. See Clutch's comment about injuries.
     
  9. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,945
    so the most talented team of the 14 teams gets the best pick... and the worst teams in the league continue to get late lotto picks so they will NEVER get any better?

    this is like letting the entire league into a playoff bracket where the champion also gets the #1 pick... and then everyone wonders why the same team wins the championship every year lol.
     
  10. J Sizzle

    J Sizzle Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    43,505
    Likes Received:
    29,554
    This idea would absolutely ruin the league. No thanks.
     
  11. TesseracT

    TesseracT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    1,131
    so OKC gets the #1 pick?

    and the bad teams get even worse
     
  12. iNoseBleedRed

    iNoseBleedRed Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,410
    Likes Received:
    2,454
    The op's idea sucks but not based off this logic.

    You realize OKC will be a perennial cesspool in two years? Kd and Westbrook are gonna leave, and ain't no free agents going to okc. I would say it's probably the least attractive city to play in in the entire NBA.
     
  13. delishman

    delishman Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    103
    Clearly they aren't going to drastically reform it. I just hope they adjust enough to where the worst team is only at a slight advantage and so on.
     
  14. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    36,812
    Likes Received:
    13,196
    I still like the credits idea that came and went in what felt like a matter of hours. I think the NBA is too scared foolish GM's will run their franchises into the ground with that system though.
     
  15. dontfaulkup28

    dontfaulkup28 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2015
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    13
    Honestly i think the best thing to do is just let the worst team get the first pick like the NFL yes it gives teams a reason to tank but for example the Magic who have been bad since Dwight left have tanked and still not been given the 1st pick. I feel the worst team should get the best pick and allow the league to grow like the NFL does with the worst teams digging themselves out of the basement. Now if the front offices suck and do not know how to draft that is a different story but I have never been a fan of lottery just because especially in the NBA the talent drop off usually after the 1st or 2nd pick is drastic so for the worst team to possibly suck again because of how the ball bounces seems a tad pointless. Plus making the worst team better will expand the NBA in towns where the team has sucked......I live in orlando and I hear more about the new soccer team then I do the magic.....
     
  16. thething

    thething Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,621
    Likes Received:
    261
    Once they are eliminated from playoffs, I don't think players care about whether they finish from 9-15 in the conference either. The motivation is to play well so that they can get a new contract.
     
  17. roflmcwaffles

    roflmcwaffles Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,388
    Likes Received:
    113
    NBA is so much different than the NFL. 1 player can completely change a franchise instantly.

    You can't give that much incentive for a team to tank, it will turn into a **** storm quick.

    Also NFL teams can't complete "tank" like NBA teams can. If they don't try they'll get their heads knocked off.
     
  18. dontfaulkup28

    dontfaulkup28 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2015
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    13
    That is true.....you do not see NBA players getting destroyed for slacking hahahaha and I would agree with you that one player can change a franchise, but idk something has to be done because I cannot think of many teams that were bottom dwellers that are now good? The bad teams seem to always be bad....yes they have short spurts of decent play but in the end they still are garbage.....the good teams always seem to be at the top.....it is likely if not all due to management bringing in the right pieces but idk NBA is really the only sport that you can pretty much pick the playoff teams every year without much knowledge (with a few exceptions here or there)
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now