Which would you rather have??Who is more valuable to an NBA team in terms of winning a championship/profitable/long term?? Do they mean the same thing/ is one better than the other/ what are some examples and please discuss...
I'd rather have the better player, which in this case, is the elite guy. What kind of question is this? This is along the same lines as that "is JJ Watt hurting our defense?" thread.
This is the most ridiculous question ever posed on this BBS. It's like asking if you'd rather have a regular boiled wiener on a microwaved hot dog bun, or a grilled all-beef frankfurter on a toasted onion-encrusted gourmet bun.
if you're asking if I like the steak from outback or the steak from Vic & Anthony's better I'm going to go with the latter.
I would be jizzing with either right now. We have the young talents to build around such a player and all it takes is another all star and we'll be contenders again.
Your sexual preference is none of my concern you sausage smoker you and I know its ridiculous that's why it's in the hangout/ not nba dish.. Chris Paul- all star Russell Westbrook- Elite Derrick Rose-All Star Rondo- Elite
so you are saying all star is better than elite? agree with the other post above this is a stupid r****ded question.. but i wouldnt go as far as saying its the stupidest question ever asked on CF.. there have been some pretty dumb questions
Whichever one costs less. When has an elite point guard ever won a championship? Give me an elite big-man every day of the week.
Jeremy Lin will be an all star but by no means is he elite...all star sells jerseys so as an owner I'll take either