Debbie Wasserman Schultz already has a new job. Do you agree?

slap in the face to sanders and his supporters.

 

They just keep ****ing you guys, and you keep taking it. Amazing.

 

What do you expect from ignorant followers (words from their own party). It's full meltdown without an end in sight. Lets see if any of them come to their senses and drop support of that crooked family.

 

She rigged a presidential election? False. There hasn't been a presidential election yet. She'll be gone before there is one.

Laundered money from charities? HAven't seen any evidence of that.

There are real scandals with the DNC, so you overstating things and saying crap that isn't true, won't help to make that point. Better to just lay it out there like it really is.

 

It isn't charities listed there, and again, there is legitimate scandal there. No need to overstate what is actually there in order to try and spin it to be worse.

When that's done it detracts from the actual wrongdoing that is in the emails.

For the record Debbie Wasserman Schultz is responsible because she was in charge. It's right that she will no longer be the chair of the DNC. That being said it also isn't like she actually did any of the things in the email or ordered those things personally. So claiming she did all these things isn't strictly accurate. But she is responsible.

 

Does anyone really decide on which candidate to vote for based on the party chair or any campaign staff position?

 

Doesn't exclude you. Your guys are ****ing you guys too. Why don't you get this?

This is a problem for all of you. We just got paper proof on one side, doesn't mean it's only happening on one side.

 

What do you think Trump is all about? He spent MONTHS being attacked by the establishment...Bush, Graham, McConnell, etc.

You can hate Trump's positions, his temperament, and distrust what he will actually do...but you can't deny he's NOT establishment.

 

That's besides the point.

Are you denying that the RNC did everything in its power to divert democracy and usurp Trump?

 

It's true he's not establishment. Yet, he does establishment tactics. He spent his money in donations in order to get more states to not pile on in the Trump University Fraud case, that he's in.

Spending his money to buy influence with other politicians in order to escape court trials and additional legal hassles is definitely an establishment move.

So he operates like he is establishment, even though he isn't in the establishment.

 

I know exactly what you mean, that is the exact reason why I and millions of people are voting for Trump.

 

Not denying anything...but unlike the DNC we have no concrete proof of this.

BTW, if you asked Trump, he would say he wasn't treated fairly (and stated it quite often during the primaries)...but then we know you don't trust anything he has to say...right?

 

This latest scandal showing how deep the corruption in the Democratic party is has pushed me towards voting Trump. I don't see how people can support someone who represents corruption at the highest level.

 

You could make that argument and it has validity, but you could also simply state Trump is defending himself against what he feels are unfair attacks.

I don't begrudge folks thinking either way. Personally, I haven't followed the facts surrounding these cases close enough to know how I feel about them. If you have, and have made a judgement based upon that, good for you. That's to be encouraged.

 

Trump is an authoritarian fascist.... They are never establishment.