1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Change of Fortune: NBA stars who would've won more or less titles on different teams

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by plutoblue11, Jun 15, 2016.

  1. Jturbofuel

    Jturbofuel Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    5,205
    Likes Received:
    3,697

    The offer was for either Sampson or the #1 pick which became Hakeem Portland would have given us Drexler and the #3 pick. Rockets could have had Drexler, Jordan, and Hakeem.
     
  2. plutoblue11

    plutoblue11 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    ZERO, if we go by the absolute standard of having "no" all-stars on the team from the beginning until the end. No NBA team has ever had one lone superstar win a championship without having other players who had never produced one-all star appearance It's an unrealistic and imaginary standard

    The only two teams I could point to where there was one "definite" superstar with much lesser players:

    Rick Barry (Golden State Warriors), 1973-74 - Jaamal Wilkes was rookie. Butch Beard, at the time, was slightly above average point guard whose better days were in Atlanta and Cleveland

    Hakeem Olajuwon (Houston Rockets), 1993-94
    Sam Cassell was a rookie. Otis Thorpe was a really good power forward, though passing his prime. Kenny Smith and Vernon Maxwell were fine guards who never quite all-stars.


    The teams who I could point to and say had no "superstars" at all, but were able to win a title:

    1978-79 Seattle Supersonics: Though, they did have *six* players who were all-stars at some point in their careers -- Gus Williams; Dennis Johnson; Jack Sikma; Lonnie Johnson, Freddie Brown, and John Johnson. With four of those players being in their primes.

    2003-04 Detroit Pistons: ...But they had four bonafide all-star caliber players in Ben Wallace, Rasheed Wallace, Rip Hamilton,and Chauncey Billups.

    For NBA championships, the general standard is One*reigning*or previous MVP with at least one to two other all-stars, and in some cases another former MVP (or MVP candidate). If that's not met, your team needs four to five guys who are bonafide all-stars who can play both ends of the floor, pretty well.
     
  3. plutoblue11

    plutoblue11 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    It doesn't work like that, because some of the worst teams in the West developed into some really good teams from the late 90s/early 2000s until late 2000s.

    If LeBron ends up on a team, like the Clippers, Hornets, Nuggets, or Warriors...or even the Rockets or T-Wolves. He would've had the chance to end up some teams that were already kind of competitive or good.


    I do not care what kind of feelings people have for this man, he is a livin' and playin' legend. His numbers competely contradict your point, when was he carried in the playoffs. I remember dominating all of the playoff performances in Cleveland for the most part. *He* often carried the Heat through the season and playoffs, he pretty much lead the way in the two title victories.
     
  4. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    34,107
    Likes Received:
    13,494
    [Debbie Downer]I think the whole proposition here is flawed. Stars don't win titles, teams do. Everybody's fortunes would have changed if they were on different teams. Jordan could have been ringless if he was drafted some other place. Tracy McGrady could have been a champion if he played with the right cast. Sure, they make their contributions -- and superstars make outsized contributions -- but nobody wins or loses all by himself. [/Debbie Downer]
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. cheshire

    cheshire Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    1,051
    Likes Received:
    396
    One of the things that I feel is underrated about the 94 and 95 title runs is the fact that Hakeem faced off his greatest rivals for the best center in the league and showed who's boss.

    If it wasn't for the tomfoolery that derailed the 86 team on, Dream may have delivered the silverware earlier. Hakeem was posting eye-popping numbers in the post-season year after year that belong in video games.
     
    #25 cheshire, Jun 17, 2016
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2016
  6. Yung-T

    Yung-T Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    24,403
    Likes Received:
    7,048
    Very weird question as the answer is incredibly simple. Drop a star on any lottery team, mid 2k Rockets/Lakers, etc and combine it with a bad front office: Obviously no Ring, unless you somehow think Jordan would've won jack if he played for a terrible team with a bad supporting cast.

    Now drop guys like Stockton, Melone, Barkley, McGrady, Durant etc on the past championship teams and it's nearly a given that they would've won at least one Ring.

    Dont even know why this is being debated.
     
  7. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    24,402
    Likes Received:
    14,686
    This is a good post, the reality is just like at work the biggest factor to your success will always be luck. If Zuckerberg had been born in a 3rd world country no matter how bright he is he wouldn't have the time or option to drop college and create facebook.

    While most of us tend to dietify these players, at the end of the day there are still a lot of good players so you could exchange their positions and we'd look at them differently. For example what if LA got Paul Pierce instead how many rings would Pierce and Shaq have by now? Or what if Kobe ended up as a King would we even think he is one of the best? If Lebron got drafted by Memphis Grizzlies without his Cleveland boys to hype him up and the Cavs owner enabling his behavior maybe Lebron wouldn't have become this arrogant etc.

    That's why I think posts like these are ultimately pointless because who we are is the culmination of events that happened in our lives. If you start changing it due to "what if" scenarios, these players would have changed dramatically.
     
  8. Fefo

    Fefo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    344
    Tim Duncan won it as the lone Superstar in 2003. At that point manu was a rookie averaging 8 ppg, parker was still developing, robinson was waaaay past his prime in his last year. In the finals he averaged 24pts, 17 rpg, 5.2 apg and 5.2 bpg, and barely missed a quad double by 2 blocks. He had great role players in general around him, but he was the real force there.
     
  9. plutoblue11

    plutoblue11 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    Tony Parker was still a very above average point guard, Ginobili was still getting better, then they also had Bruce Bowen (arguably the best wing defender at the time) and Stephen Jackson. Even David Robinson (previous MVP)as still a pretty good player, defensively.

    There's five players in there who either became all-stars or were near all-star level. In Robinson's case, even though, he was at the end of his career, he was still a contributor.
     
  10. plutoblue11

    plutoblue11 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    This is kind of my point, when people use the "rings" as an argument in any sport, obvious you aren't going to win as much, "Not playing for Yankees...Patriots...Lakers or whoever is a powerhouse at the time."
     
  11. SF3isBack!!

    SF3isBack!! Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    10,163
    Likes Received:
    1,879
    Houston for some reason cant get both stars and role players at the same time. It gets role players doesn't have stars and it gets the stars and then doesn't have the role players.
     
  12. plutoblue11

    plutoblue11 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    You know I've always found that funny. It really is sad, how the Rockets have been going through that cycle for over 40 years.
     
  13. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    28,752
    Likes Received:
    7,038
    With all the time Harden has saved on defense and Zuckerberg on College, I would expect he and Zuckerberg are masterminding world takeover.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now