1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The difference between the Warriors and Rockets is playmaking ability

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by smoothie, May 24, 2015.

  1. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,945
    sorry to state the obvious, but sometimes people get too into the minutia that it becomes hard to see the forest from within the trees. or, if youre under 30, its easier to see the whole club from the balcony rather than on the dance floor.

    so lets take a step back and examine the obvious reason we are struggling, and what we will have to add to be able to get passed the warriors next season. (inb4 "its not over yet", and "too early to talk about changes").

    playmakers vs finishers:

    playmakers are players who can create their own offense. give them the ball and get out of the way is a viable option for them. another option is they can create for others with their passing via PnR, drive and kick, passing out of a double team, running a fast break, finding the cutter, etc...

    finishers are obviously guys who can finish plays that others set up for them. examples would be hitting an open 3, scoring on an alley-oop, or scoring in transition, etc...

    in short, playmakers points come un-assisted, or they are the ones making the assist. while finsher's points come from an assist and they don't usually get assists.


    lets take a look at the warriors:

    playmakers - curry, klay, barnes, green, bogut (passing), livingston, barbosa, iguodala... even lee and speights if you want to count their contributions during the regular season.

    pretty much everyone on the warriors can create for themselves and others while defending their position. on top of that you give them an offensive system that creates easy shots.

    and the rockets:

    playmakers - harden, dmo (whos not playing), papa (who doesn't play), prigs (passing), and josh (if he's not hurting you in the process).

    *howard is actually way better as a finisher, like we saw in the first 2 rounds, rather than running posts-plays for him all game.

    **i'd also like to see papa replace jones next game because he's better at creating, and wouldn't be worse on defense.

    the rockets run a 1 man show, and while dwight and josh have their moments on offense, the are way better as finishers. the rockets are also playing 3 guys who can't defend their position (the grandpas and jones).

    obvious conclusion:

    this summer we have to stock up on playmakers. they are harder to acquire, but we will need to add 2 or 3 if we want to be better than the warriors next season.
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    23,994
    Likes Received:
    19,886
    Its not really about play-makers when comparing Houston to Golden State. Totally different offense. The Warriors offense revolves around constant movement, coming off picks, and quick passing.

    The Rockets offense revolves around Harden high P&R, and drive a kicks. Some 4/5 P&R's as well, and some sets out of Horns.

    The Rockets really just don't have the all around shooting to run an offense like GS or The Spurs for that matter. They are a spot up 3 point shooting team, and drive and kick.

    .....

    Its not about play-making off the dribble because the Warriors aren't really the most creative in terms of play-making. Curry can Iso, but their 2nd play-maker from the perimeter (Klay) is really just putting the ball into their sets, and then from that point on, they rely on movement from the perimeter guys coming off screens, and the bigs often are assisting. Its more or less a system offense. Less creativity from the perimeter players. If you have the personnel to do so, its beautiful basketball. The Rockets during the Adelman years had some complementary players to that type of system, but ultimately didn't have the healthy star talent to truly compete.

    What the Rockets need is probably something more or less that resembles the Lebron Miami position-less teams where Harden plays the Lebron role with spacing. Harden really just needs better shooting, better disciplined team defense, and someone who can play that Wade role who can take over at times. The Rockets don't have the defense consistently, and they don't have that second play-maker.

    The Rockets are right there honestly. With their system, and a few improvements in certain areas I think they could win it all next year. Especially since the Warriors had super lucky health throughout the year, and likely will have a let down after winning the title (yes, i would be shocked if they didn't win it this year easily).

    But yes, the Rockets more than other contenders that have a system that doesn't need one, need a second play-maker to play that Wade role. If they don't do that, then their system needs to change a bit in order to make the Rockets get more action off the ball. Alot of Horns sets, some stuff that resembles triangle offense (no not to the extent of what the Phil Jackson teams do it) and if D-Mo comes back healthy I expect to see him have a large role in the offense.
     
    #2 dobro1229, May 24, 2015
    Last edited: May 24, 2015
    2 people like this.
  3. bmd

    bmd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,747
    Likes Received:
    3,517
    If the Rockets had a PG who could create and shoot, I think they'd be very similar to the Warriors.

    They'd have Harden and the PG who can both make plays and shoot, they'd have Ariza who is great on defense and can hit 3's on offense, they'd have Motiejunas who is a decent defender, can spread the floor by hitting the 3, and can also score by posting up, and then you have Dwight in the middle playing great defense, rebounding, and being a beast in the pick and roll.

    1-4 would be able to hit 3's and there would be two perimeter playmakers, and they'd also have a defensive stopper.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Rox23

    Rox23 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,459
    Likes Received:
    64
    Duh. And at no time was that more apparent than last night's game. Everyone on GS can pass. This includes Bogut and Green (also Lee is a good passer when playing).

    As for us...Howard can pass (out of the post) but doesn't. Terry doesn't pass. Brewer is a finisher, not a passer. Jones is a finisher who sometimes passes. Smith passes, but half of his passes end up in the front row. Papinikolou passes but doesn't play. Beverley doesn't (i.e. can't) pass. Ariza has no passing ability whatsoever either. And so Harden has to make up for all the lack of ball movement.
     
  5. Zergling

    Zergling Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    5,726
    Likes Received:
    3,625
    I'm sure the Rockets are aware of this. Morey's heart must have been broken when Dragic said he didn't want to come back. Could you imagine our lefty back-court with Harden/Dragic.

    Hell, Harden/Bosh would've been awesome too. So many near misses.
     
  6. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,945
    true. but how much of that was decided based on the players abilities?

    if we add more playmakers, we might be able to run a more complex offense. we have 1 playmaker and so we run 1 play.

    the warriors don't just run a great system (they do), but they have players that can make plays as well. if the rockets and warriors switched offensive systems, the warriors would still kick our ass. limit their offense to curry/green high PnR and you still have to bring an extra defender, which leaves someone open. same as rockets with harden, except the warriors have guys to make plays once the ball starts swinging. the rockets dont have guys that can do that. they just pump fake the 3 and pass the ball.

    no matter the system, you need guys who can make plays. the rockets barely have a system and we made the WCF! we are really only 2 or 3 playmakers away from being equal or better than the warriors.

    bring back a healthy dmo, add a PG who can score off the ball, and a 6th man type scorer off the bench. if everyone can stay healthy next year i think we could rival the warriors for best record and home court through the playoffs.
     
  7. linkz1993

    linkz1993 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    4
    should of changed the thread to say we need a real point guard
     
  8. Hard Rock

    Hard Rock Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,151
    Likes Received:
    281
    forget about Dragic, we don't have cap room to sign a star FA this summer anyway.

    trade TJones + Papa + draft right to Llull + 2016 1st pk for George Hill.
    or add a few expiring contracts to trade for Lawson.

    Trade #18+#32 to move into lottery and select Myles Turner

    Trade N.Johnson+Prig for Dunlavy(S&T)

    re-sign Bev, Brewer, Terry, Smith, McDaniel

    sign Scola & Turkoglu with Vet. min.

    Howard, Capela, Turner
    DMo, Smith, Scola
    Ariza, Dunleavy, Turkoglu
    Harden, Brewer, McDaniel
    Hill, Beverley, Terry

    this is a Championship team and this is very doable
     
  9. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,414
    Likes Received:
    15,846
    It's not just about ability but system. The Warriors put pressure on the defense by constantly being in motion and finding openings. When Harden doesn't have the ball, he mostly stands there or floats a little - the person guarding him doesn't have a hard job unless Harden has the ball. When Curry or Thompson don't have the ball, they are constantly running around in circles trying to lose their defenders. It (a) tires out the defense and (b) forces defensive mistakes. You lose them on one screen or try to cheat and they change direction, and they'll get a wide open shot.

    Adding a playmaking PG doesn't do much for the Rockets because of their offensive style. Harden needs the ball to be effective and likes to get it in a set position instead of running around screens or getting it on the move. So the PG just isn't going to have the ball all that much. It's similar to other offenses with a dominant SG or SF (a Jordan or Kobe-offense or the Lebron offenses of recent years): the PG always is forgettable because they aren't the primary ball-handler. The Rockets' PG primarily just needs to be a shooter who keeps defenses honest, unless they are willing to redesign their overall offensive system.
     
  10. MuddyWaters

    MuddyWaters Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2015
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    77
    Curry is one of the greatest shooters ever in a system that was made for him. All curry has to do is run around where ever he go someone is setting screens (moving screens) to free him. The basketball gods has blessed this team
     
  11. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    35,202
    Likes Received:
    24,226
    This is hilarious, as if Curry is a great shooter only because he runs around. All great shooters run around to get open and their teams all set multiple screens for them.

    We don't do that because we don't really have great shooters. Harden is not a great shooter. He's a great scorer. He doesn't run around to get open when he doesn't have the ball. Or the system simply does not design anything for him to use off ball screens to get open shots. Anyway, Harden is just not as consistent a shooter as guys like Allen, Hamilton, and Curry.

    The only really great shooter we have is Jason Terry but he doesn't have the legs to run around on offense and chase the other guy on defense.

    Our spot up shooters don't run around and don't use screens. They just stand around, waiting for Harden to suck the double team and kick the ball to them. And they shoot only around .333 when open.
     
  12. daoshi

    daoshi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    75
    I don't think it's the playmaking ability of the individual players, more of the playmaking ability of the team, or system.

    There are only two other teams in today's NBA are doing what the Warriors do, constant movement of bodies and ball, the Spurs, and the "regular season" Hawks. It's very hard to defend them because you have to CONSTANTLY pay attention to the man you are guarding, AND be ready to help your teammates, AND worrying about yourself get screened, because so much of their movement away from the ball. On top of that, they don't stop when the initial play doesn't produce expected result, they will run again, and again before the shot clock expires.

    I don't think you need special talent to run that system, players made to NBA certainly have the skills to do that. It's their willingness to commit to it, and keep working at it. Of course, you need a coach staff to put that in place first.

    The Rockets doesn't have much options other than Harden PnR, or ISO. Once a team sends another player to shadow the lane behind the primary defender, then the Rockets pretty much out of option, game 3 made that painfully obvious.
     
  13. Crashlanded19

    Crashlanded19 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    This is why we should have pulled the trigger on the Dragic trade. We probably could have convinced him to stay.
     
  14. DraftBoy10

    DraftBoy10 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    42

    It's not about a pg and/or a playmaker. It's about constant OFF ball movement, stretching the court, and reading the defense. This is the Kings early 200 offense with better backcourt shooting, and much better defensive strategy.
     
  15. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    42,407
    Likes Received:
    5,809
    Warriors are more talented on offense for sure, especially when it comes to pure shooting. But what really sets them apart from the Rockets is they play with purpose. Everyone seems to know what they are supposed to do and they let the offense create easy shots (or mismatches that can be exploited). The Rockets ad lib way too often which results in wasted possessions because nobody knows what's going on.

    The Warriors have a huge advantage in coaching on both ends of the floor.
     
  16. Kwame

    Kwame Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,756
    Likes Received:
    333
    They have more quality depth than the Rockets.
    They have a better coach and coaching staff.
    They have a better GM, owner, and hca.
     
  17. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    15,915
    Likes Received:
    1,598
    Pay the lux tax, Les, give players their "player's option", DM, and playmaking talent gap gets closed

    Dragic didnt want to be here. Chasing the cash and biggest offensive role over winning. Dragic had to "lie in the bed" that he made when he went player-option route. The point of it was to maximize his earnings showcasing himself to the fullest, so he wasnt gonna go where there's even the slightest threat of diminished role and money. Houston offered none of those.
     
  18. zcarenow

    zcarenow Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2013
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    572
    Terence Jones has been a poor finisher at the rim during the playoffs overall.
     
  19. zcarenow

    zcarenow Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2013
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    572
    When Harden has the ball, everybody else just stands around and watches. Unlike the Warriors who cut to the rim and have movement.
     
  20. Jake Tower

    Jake Tower Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Messages:
    7,538
    Likes Received:
    7,937
    And speaking of finishers, Terence Jones is incapable of getting the ball close to the basket without bending down to take a dribble before attempting a shot, giving the paint defenders plenty of time to block him.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now