http://news.aol.com/political-machi...loses-general-election?ncid=NWS00010000000001 Interesting. Zogby usually is close enough to pay attention to, as he has been in the past...
Hussein-Obama is not a viable candidate. Just because he's a well spoken halfrican-American doesn't qualify him for the job. The guy just keeps looking worse the more we get to know about him.
I don't see any way that America will go to the polls during war time and elect a liberal female. The combination is a killer for her if we are still tied up in the Middle East.........which we will be.
If you actually believed that, you wouldn't have to resort to prejudices by calling him Hussein-Obama. Or do you refer to everyone by their middle + last names? Good to see you already relying on subtle racism though - at least you don't hide it.
This means absolutely nothing. November 2007 head-to-head polls are of very limited value for November 2008.
While I don't think I agree with his politics, and do not plan on voting for him, the two things that you cite are irrelevant at best. Wasn't it George W. Bush when he was running, who ballyhooed being a "uniter, and not a divider?" Seems like you have tossed that one right out the party platform window.
I have yet to see anyone explain what makes Obama well qualified to run for the president. He is all show, very little go.
Do you really think they are irrelevant to the American voters? I'd say they are important. Not saying it's right or wrong, but they are indeed important.
LOL calling me racist for using his middle name. Wow, that's rich. A lot of middle/maiden names are used in politics...George W Bush, Hillaroid Rodham Clinton, etc. In fact, apparently Barack chooses to highlight his Muslim name, because he decided to quit going by "Barry" some time ago, in favor of Barack. Would you prefer I start calling him O'Bama? Maybe an Irish twist?
Not with his anti-manned space flight he won't.. As for the main point of this thread to quote from the link: I'm putting very little stock in an online poll a year before the election.
I'm not going to call you racist but just for you I am going to mention Asia in this thread. <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mU2IetBZ93Y&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mU2IetBZ93Y&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
You'd say they are important because it gives you ammunition to attack somebody you don't like simply because he has a (D) instead of an (R) behind his name. I never see you analyze their stance on the issues. All I ever see you do is post what you feel are clever modification of their names (ie Hillaroid). It is the same low brow attack as the people who disagreed with Rush who kept saying that "Rush is fat." Give me critical analysis or stop trying. Most posters on this BBS can tell you that I lean to the conservative side of the aisle...but when you do stuff like this, it is really irritating. It does not help the Republican party. It will turn off moderates. Good thing that the Republican chairpersons do not subscribe to this kind of Kindergarten politics.
