The question is not where he was born. The question is what he is hiding on his Hawaiian birth certificate. A newspaper clipping or a Certificate of Live Birth does not answer the question. The story is the coverup, not the location of his birth. The simpletons can't differentiate the difference in the argument, which is exactly what Axelrod was betting on with this strategy. See VLAurelio's posts for confirmation.
You're right. They are all racist. Every last one of them. I think its pretty acceptable that the vast majority of people in America would rather have Obama as president than Biden or Pelosi.
just to be clear, what's been released is a certification of live birth, which is merely a summary of the actual certificate that apparently, only a few hawaiian doctors are allowed to see.
I do believe his is a natural born citizen of the US -- as do many other 'birthers'. But that's not the question -- the question is what is being covered up by hiding the real birth certificate. I answered your question. Now, answer my question. Why is Obama suppressing the release of his birth certificate?
But hey! I'm all for the federal gouvernment showing how kickass it is by trumpeting their overlord status over the state and overruling laws for the gossip columns.
ANSWER: He is not supressing anything Now answer this: Is a Hawaii Department of Health issued Certification of Live Birth not a legal document?
It's not his birth certificate. Why won't he release his birth certificate? Furthermore, why has he spent over one millions dollars in legal expenses fighting the release of his birth certificate? How can that not raise an eyebrow for even the most hardcore Obama supporters?
there's another doc they have not released: Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said Monday she has seen the original birth records that verify Obama was born in Hawaii, and is a "natural-born American citizen." Fukino made the announcement in hopes of ending any lingering rumors about Obama's citizenship. She issued a similar press release Oct. 31. State law bars release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who does not have a tangible interest. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99N5J4O0&show_article=1
Certification of Live Birth is complete by itself I have asked you twice and you have not answer yet Basso, for the 3rd time, Is Certification of Live Birth a legal document?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/01/AR2008050103224.html sigh why is the world full of idiots? I'm saying that for both sides of the crazies here. Though I dare speculate that if McCain had been elected, this issue would be moot, despite the fact that McCain actually had a weaker case. Point is, this bulls*** is pointless. And if you wanna play games around this crap, then fine, forums like this are just another way to divert time anyways. But it makes me question your priorities in this world.
