1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Darth to Bambi: Put up, or Shut up.

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Apr 21, 2009.

  1. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,401
    Likes Received:
    9,319
    Fox news, via the LA Times.

    [rquoter]
    With interrogation docs out, Cheney asks Obama to now release secret memos on what those techniques discovered

    Former vice president Dick Cheney is back.

    Sure, you say, he's been all over since Jan. 20 knocking the new Obama administration for weakening U.S. national security.

    This time though, two interesting points by the longtime Washington power denizen:

    One, appearing on Fox News' Hannity show tonight and tomorrow, Cheney says he's got no problem with the Obama crew blaming the previous administration for inherited problems, as they've done so frequently since taking their oaths.

    “There is a great temptation for a new administration to come in," Cheney says, "and when you find a problem, obviously, to blame it on your predecessor. We did it."

    We have two videos of the Cheney interview below.

    But what bothers Cheney this week is not so much that President Obama released the Justice Dept's memos on the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques in recent years.

    It's that the new president simultaneously withheld other classified memos that show what those interrogation techniques produced, the information that, Cheney says, those interrogations successfully helped prevent another attack on the homeland since 9/11. The results too, should be part of the national security debate, Cheney adds.

    “One of the things that I find a little bit disturbing about this recent disclosure," Cheney tells Hannity, "is they put out the legal memos, the memos that the CIA got from the Office of Legal Counsel, but they didn't put out the memos that showed the success of the effort. And there are reports that show specifically what we gained as a result of this activity. They have not been declassified.”

    “I formally asked that they be declassified now.
    I haven't announced this up until now, I haven't talked about it, but I know specifically of reports that I read, that I saw that lay out what we learned through the interrogation process and what the consequences were for the country.”

    “And I've now formally asked the CIA to take steps to declassify those memos so we can lay them out there and the American people have a chance to see what we obtained and what we learned and how good the intelligence was, as well as to see this debate over the legal opinions.”[/rquoter]

    <embed type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src='http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf' id='mediumFlashEmbedded' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' bgcolor='#000000' allowScriptAccess='always' allowFullScreen='true' quality='high' name='FOX News' play='false' scale='noscale' menu='false' salign='LT' scriptAccess='always' wmode='false' height='275' width='305' flashvars='playerId=videolandingpage&playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&categoryTitle=undefined&referralObject=4489492' />

    <embed type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src='http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf' id='mediumFlashEmbedded' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' bgcolor='#000000' allowScriptAccess='always' allowFullScreen='true' quality='high' name='FOX News' play='false' scale='noscale' menu='false' salign='LT' scriptAccess='always' wmode='false' height='275' width='305' flashvars='playerId=videolandingpage&playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&categoryTitle=undefined&referralObject=4489516' />
     
  2. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,864
    Likes Received:
    41,391
    A snarling, petulant cheney defending torture for reasons of his own ego will surely put a dent in Obama's high approval ratings.

    Don't be a stranger, Dick. Everytime you open your mouth, you remind us of the waterboarding that you gave America for 8 years.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    i know he shat all over the constitution for 8 years, but can someone please point out to dick that his reign is over? shut up and go **** yourself mr. ex-vp.
     
  4. D-Lite

    D-Lite Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    62
    I approve of this.

    -Jack Bauer
     
  5. twhy77

    twhy77 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,041
    Likes Received:
    73
    But he does have a point does he not? Obama clearly let the torture memo's out to say "hey, look, I'm different from the last guy's on torture", which is great, I'm glad we moved in that direction.

    Depending on what's in the memos Cheney wants to be let out though, I think it's a fair point to at least mention the intelligence gathered as fruits of the labor, and possibly let out things that can be declassified as they are no longer a threat. I think that would be fair.

    Obviously though, Cheney's politicizing the matter as well, but he does have a valid point.
     
  6. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,401
    Likes Received:
    9,319
    Michale Hayden says the interrogations made us safer.

    [rquoter]Hayden said that those who object to the CIA’s ability to use such enhanced interrogation techniques are acting “honorably,” but are avoiding the “inconvenient truth” that the use of such techniques have made the nation safer.

    “It's difficult for me to judge the president,” Hayden said. “I don't think I would do that. But [White House Press Secretary Robert] Gibbs’ comments [that ‘it is the use of those techniques, the use of those techniques in the view of the world, that have made us less safe'] bring another reality fully in front of us. It's what I'll call, without meaning any irreverence to anybody, a really inconvenient truth.”

    Most of the people who oppose these techniques want to be able to say, "‘I don't want my nation doing this, which is a purely honorable position,” Hayden continued. “The facts of the case are that the use of these techniques against these terrorists made us safer. It really did work. The president's speech, President Bush in September of '06, outlined how one detainee led to another, led to another, with the use of these techniques.”[/rquoter]
     
  7. twhy77

    twhy77 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,041
    Likes Received:
    73
    Dude, do you ever wonder why Clutch kicked you out of here? Don't let it happen again. Debate intelligently. You're way better than that drivel you just posted.
     
  8. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,401
    Likes Received:
    9,319
    and here's the relevant section from Bush's 2006 speech:

    [rquoter]Within months of September the 11th, 2001, we captured a man known as Abu Zubaydah. We believe that Zubaydah was a senior terrorist leader and a trusted associate of Osama bin Laden. Our intelligence community believes he had run a terrorist camp in Afghanistan where some of the 9/11 hijackers trained, and that he helped smuggle al Qaeda leaders out of Afghanistan after coalition forces arrived to liberate that country. Zubaydah was severely wounded during the firefight that brought him into custody -- and he survived only because of the medical care arranged by the CIA.

    After he recovered, Zubaydah was defiant and evasive. He declared his hatred of America. During questioning, he at first disclosed what he thought was nominal information -- and then stopped all cooperation. Well, in fact, the "nominal" information he gave us turned out to be quite important. For example, Zubaydah disclosed Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- or KSM -- was the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, and used the alias "Muktar." This was a vital piece of the puzzle that helped our intelligence community pursue KSM. Abu Zubaydah also provided information that helped stop a terrorist attack being planned for inside the United States -- an attack about which we had no previous information. Zubaydah told us that al Qaeda operatives were planning to launch an attack in the U.S., and provided physical descriptions of the operatives and information on their general location. Based on the information he provided, the operatives were detained -- one while traveling to the United States.

    We knew that Zubaydah had more information that could save innocent lives, but he stopped talking. As his questioning proceeded, it became clear that he had received training on how to resist interrogation. And so the CIA used an alternative set of procedures. These procedures were designed to be safe, to comply with our laws, our Constitution, and our treaty obligations. The Department of Justice reviewed the authorized methods extensively and determined them to be lawful. I cannot describe the specific methods used -- I think you understand why -- if I did, it would help the terrorists learn how to resist questioning, and to keep information from us that we need to prevent new attacks on our country. But I can say the procedures were tough, and they were safe, and lawful, and necessary.

    Zubaydah was questioned using these procedures, and soon he began to provide information on key al Qaeda operatives, including information that helped us find and capture more of those responsible for the attacks on September the 11th. For example, Zubaydah identified one of KSM's accomplices in the 9/11 attacks -- a terrorist named Ramzi bin al Shibh. The information Zubaydah provided helped lead to the capture of bin al Shibh. And together these two terrorists provided information that helped in the planning and execution of the operation that captured Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
    Once in our custody, KSM was questioned by the CIA using these procedures, and he soon provided information that helped us stop another planned attack on the United States. During questioning, KSM told us about another al Qaeda operative he knew was in CIA custody -- a terrorist named Majid Khan. KSM revealed that Khan had been told to deliver $50,000 to individuals working for a suspected terrorist leader named Hambali, the leader of al Qaeda's Southeast Asian affiliate known as "J-I". CIA officers confronted Khan with this information. Khan confirmed that the money had been delivered to an operative named Zubair, and provided both a physical description and contact number for this operative.

    Based on that information, Zubair was captured in June of 2003, and he soon provided information that helped lead to the capture of Hambali. After Hambali's arrest, KSM was questioned again. He identified Hambali's brother as the leader of a "J-I" cell, and Hambali's conduit for communications with al Qaeda. Hambali's brother was soon captured in Pakistan, and, in turn, led us to a cell of 17 Southeast Asian "J-I" operatives. When confronted with the news that his terror cell had been broken up, Hambali admitted that the operatives were being groomed at KSM's request for attacks inside the United States -- probably [sic] using airplanes.

    During questioning, KSM also provided many details of other plots to kill innocent Americans. For example, he described the design of planned attacks on buildings inside the United States, and how operatives were directed to carry them out. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent the people trapped above from escaping out the windows.

    KSM also provided vital information on al Qaeda's efforts to obtain biological weapons. During questioning, KSM admitted that he had met three individuals involved in al Qaeda's efforts to produce anthrax, a deadly biological agent -- and he identified one of the individuals as a terrorist named Yazid. KSM apparently believed we already had this information, because Yazid had been captured and taken into foreign custody before KSM's arrest. In fact, we did not know about Yazid's role in al Qaeda's anthrax program. Information from Yazid then helped lead to the capture of his two principal assistants in the anthrax program. Without the information provided by KSM and Yazid, we might not have uncovered this al Qaeda biological weapons program, or stopped this al Qaeda cell from developing anthrax for attacks against the United States.

    These are some of the plots that have been stopped because of the information of this vital program. Terrorists held in CIA custody have also provided information that helped stop a planned strike on U.S. Marines at Camp Lemonier in Djibouti -- they were going to use an explosive laden water tanker. They helped stop a planned attack on the U.S. consulate in Karachi using car bombs and motorcycle bombs, and they helped stop a plot to hijack passenger planes and fly them into Heathrow or the Canary Wharf in London.

    We're getting vital information necessary to do our jobs, and that's to protect the American people and our allies.

    Information from the terrorists in this program has helped us to identify individuals that al Qaeda deemed suitable for Western operations, many of whom we had never heard about before. They include terrorists who were set to case targets inside the United States, including financial buildings in major cities on the East Coast. Information from terrorists in CIA custody has played a role in the capture or questioning of nearly every senior al Qaeda member or associate detained by the U.S. and its allies since this program began. By providing everything from initial leads to photo identifications, to precise locations of where terrorists were hiding, this program has helped us to take potential mass murderers off the streets before they were able to kill.[/rquoter]
     
  9. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,049
    Lets go torture everyone 183 times just to prove how much it works. Before we get that ball rolling, let's prosecute Cheney on some trumped up charges.
     
  10. Qball

    Qball Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,151
    Likes Received:
    210
    Dude, is this your first time in a Basso thread? Debate intelligently.....doesn't apply here. Why don't you ask Basso to write something of his own to merit a debate. All he does is post some blog or article with a "witty" title and one sentence which only he and the other 2 stooges find funny.
     
  11. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    ouhlease. i was kicked out because i was personally attacking members of this board. i've apologized and i've refrained from doing that as much as possible, but i'm not going to apologize for a random internet post about our disgrace of an ex-vp (who, coincidentally used those same exact words on the floor or our senate) who can't just leave the nation to be and instead is doing all he can to try and undermine our current president.

    you're either with us or against us, right? by that standard, dick is certainly against this country.
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,864
    Likes Received:
    41,391
    First off the irony of Dick Cheney, who hid in various undisclosed locations for years, classified everything he could get hands on, claimed executive privilege on everything, and then, laughably, claimed to be immune from subpoena power as the office of the VP is part of an unaccountable, non-executive, non-legislative fourth bracnch of government - now clamoring for full disclosure in order to protect his legacy - is too absurd for me to even have to address.

    Second - did you read the stories on this? Apparently no new plots or anything was discovered with the additional torture which was why there was so much internal objection to it. As has been pointed out by many former FBI CIA etc types, of course you get people to talk with torture, unfortunatley they say whatever you want to hear to avoid being tortured.

    Cheney has a long history of pointing out plots against the US that don't exist, such as WMD evidence, falsified evidence of Iraq-9-11 connections(which he repeated, after it was proven false) I have a serious feeling that these plots averted are a lot like Cheney's WMD evidence (that was all him) - speculative, tenuous, and most of all untrue. Giving this guy who acts like a sociopath the legal power to torture people like a Grand Inquisitor in the name of the people of the United States of America is incredibly embarrassing, to put it mildly.

    If any person has done anything to NOT deserve the benefit of the doubt here, it is this jackass.
     
  13. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,261
    Likes Received:
    32,975
    " To quote you Dick . .. GO F**K YOUSELF!"

    Rocket River
     
  14. halfbreed

    halfbreed Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,157
    Likes Received:
    26
    I hate to say it but I kind of agree with Cheney here. I'm all for moving past the whole issue and want the use of torture to stop.

    However, if you're going to release memos in the name of transparency you have to release even those that may not back up your viewpoint. One of the main arguments against the use of torture is that it doesn't work. If there is evidence that it might work, it should be released.

    This isn't to say that torture will then be OK. The arguments against will just have to focus on the rule of law and other arguments.
     
  15. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,864
    Likes Received:
    41,391
    I'd like to know the circumstances of these memos Cheney is talking about - under whose direction they were written and why (and let's be clear, this is something different in kind than a DOJ memo on torture practices - this is supposedly actual intelligence)... I have a feeling they're probably phony and scrubbed and have his fingerprints all over them, as is his documented history of doing such with respect to intelligence reports.

    Once again, I remind you who the speaker is here and how incredibly willing he is to discard his "everything is secret!" principles whenver his "legacy" is on the line, or when he wanted bad phony intel out there in order to support his war dreams.
     
  16. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    Tell you what!

    Obama should agree and release the docs Cheney is referring too.

    In response, Obama should prosecute that b*stard to the fullest extent of the law!

    FULL DISCLOSURE!!!!
     
  17. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,401
    Likes Received:
    9,319
    Guess again.
     
  18. twhy77

    twhy77 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,041
    Likes Received:
    73
    If the plots averted were nothing, then Cheney will look like a moron. If they are something, then I think like halfbreed said, it's grandstanding to let out memos about the torture and then not let out memos showing what they accomplished.

    I don't think it would change the debate about torture, it's still wrong; but this is deliberately releasing documents in an unbalanced way. And hey, that's executive privilege so he shouldn't be forced to release them or anything like that. But if you're going for transparency, then declassifying memos that do not represent a security threat shouldn't be a hard move.
     
    1 person likes this.
  19. yaoluv

    yaoluv Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    4
    Cheney on Iraq: I have classified information that shows Iraq has WMD, we know where they are

    Cheney on Torture: I have classified information that torture has given us important information that has stopped terrorist attacks

    Fool me once...
     
  20. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,864
    Likes Received:
    41,391
    #20 SamFisher, Apr 21, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2009

Share This Page