Well, you're wrong, and I hope you never randomly attack a stranger for looking at you and I hope you'd never teach children this because attacking strangers is how you get killed. I mean, you aren't just wrong from a legal standpoint here, you're also wrong from a common sense stance. Attacking strangers is close to the dumbest thing you can do.
You keep making an irrelevant point that no one disputes. Martin isn't dead because Zimmerman was following him, Martin is dead because he attacked Zimmerman. There's a big difference between initiating conversation and attacking someone. One is a crime, a crime that is likely to get you killed, the other is what Zimmerman did.
Initiating a conversation? Stfu We know he thought he was up to no good. Ge wasn't just saying hinice weather we're having
I'm not sure what you are getting at here though, he asked Martin a question, Martin attacked him. There's simply no way you can spin this to make Martin in the right for attacking a stranger.
Zimmerman had the history of attacking people a cop no less Zimmerman was advised not to approach Martin period Therefore more conclusion is more logical
Not relevant here because we're talking about a time he was attacked. If he had been shot by the cop he attacked, I'd be fine with that too. Not relevant here because Zimmerman approaching Martin isn't an excuse for Martin to assault him. This sentence doesn't make any sense.
You're trying to use a rumor as proof of Martin being violent. It makes no sense that assaulting a teacher would only result in a suspension. Im using proof to prove one person actually had the history of violence. The only thing we have as proof of Martin assaulting Zimmerman is Zimmerman's word
LOL a rumor? SMH, you're seriously embarrassing yourself here. You are calling Martin's own words "a rumor"....you know what, go ahead and keep your head buried in the sand if you like, but right now you are only providing comedy with your willful ignorance.
We have his text messages, those are his words.....which you are spinning as him lying in order to hold on to your brain dead narrative. I mean, I guess it's okay, at this point you are beyond evidence and fact, you are a true believer. We might as well be talking about religion at this point the way you seem to have blind faith in your narrative.
I never said who he attacked, I just stated that he said he was suspended for fighting at one point before the suspension that led to him going to his father's. Your argument is that he was lying about being suspended for fighting, just like he was lying about attacking some other kid, just like he was lying when he took pictures with weed, just like he was lying when he took pictures with guns, just like he was lying.....basically you want to believe he was largely a good kid and your way to get past all of the evidence to the contrary is to say that he was always lying when he confirmed those things were true. Your sad delusion is pretty funny, but it makes me wonder what went wrong in your life that led to you be this kind of person.
Thats the rumor. He was suspended fo assaulting a teacher.. In reality its probably sealed because it was probably something like him some girl got having sex. That would be sealed. We don't know what the suspension wss for but why would the school keep assault hush hush? Doesn't matter what he was bragging about, he was a teenager they make up **** to brag about
Well I don't care about the "rumor", I was basing what I said off of Martin's own words.....which of course you'll say was just him lying so you can hold on to your delusions.
Do teenage kids not lie when bragging. None of your friends lied about stuff? Why would the school keep fighting a secret? Why would they let him keep going to school if he was violent?
Your assumption is that he was lying about being suspended for fighting.....why would someone lie about that? Seriously, deep down you have to realize how laughably ridiculous you are being about this.
