1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

US says Wikileaks could 'threaten national security'

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by da1, Jul 26, 2010.

  1. da1

    da1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    101
    US says Wikileaks could 'threaten national security'

    The United States has condemned as "irresponsible" the leak of 90,000 military records, saying publication could threaten national security.

    The documents released by the Wikileaks website include details of killings of Afghan civilians unreported until now.

    Three news organisations had advance access to the records, which also show Nato concerns that Pakistan and Iran are helping the Taliban in Afghanistan.

    Pakistan has denied claims its intelligence agency backed the group.

    The Pakistani presidential spokeswoman, Farahnaz Ispahani, said the leaks might be an attempt to sabotage the new strategic dialogue between the US and Pakistan.

    A spokesman for Afghan President Hamid Karzai said he was "shocked" at the scale of the leaks, but thought that "most of this is not new".

    The huge cache of classified papers - posted by Wikileaks as the Afghan War Diary - is one of the biggest leaks in US history. It was also given in advance to the New York Times, the Guardian and the German news magazine, Der Spiegel.

    The founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, said he had no reason to doubt the reliability of the reports.

    "When we publish material, what we say is: the document as we describe it is true," he said at a news conference in London.

    "We publish CIA reports all the time. They are legitimate reports, but they don't mean the CIA is telling the truth."

    Mr Assange said there was no one overarching revelation to come out of the cache.

    "The real story of this material is that it's war - it's one damn thing after another," he said. "It is the continuous small events, the continuous deaths of children, insurgents, allied forces, the maimed people. Search for the word 'amputation' in this material, or 'amputee', and there are dozens and dozens of references."

    He compared the impact of the released material to the opening of the archives of the East German secret police, the Stasi.

    Taliban-ISI meetings?

    In a statement, US National Security Adviser Gen James Jones said such classified information "could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk".

    He said the documents covered the period from January 2004 to December 2009, before President Barack Obama "announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for Afghanistan".

    But Mr Assange was sceptical, saying: "A new policy by Obama doesn't mean new practice by the US military."

    He also said Wikileaks had "tried hard to make sure that this material does not put innocents at harm".

    "All the material is over seven months old so is of no current operational consequence, even though it may be of very significant investigative consequence."

    After being asked repeatedly by reporters whether he believed some of the incidents described in the documents constituted war crimes, Mr Assange said: "It is up to a court to decide, clearly, whether something is, in the end, a crime."

    "That said, prima facie, there does appear to be evidence of war crimes in this material," he added.

    He cited as an example an attack in June 2007 by a secret US special forces unit, Task Force 373, which used a Himars (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System) to begin a raid on a compound where a senior al-Qaeda leader, Abu-Laith al-Libi, was thought to be hiding. Seven children died.

    The Nato-led International Security Assistance Force acknowledged the deaths of the children at the time, but stated that coalition troops had attacked because of "nefarious activity" there.

    It did not mention they had targeted al-Libi nor used a Himars before any shots had been fired at them, and has not commented on the details included in the Wikileaks papers.

    Pakistan's government meanwhile denied claims its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency backed the Taliban in the war in Afghanistan.

    One of the leaked documents refers to an alleged meeting between insurgents and the former ISI chief, Lt Gen Hamid Gul.

    He dismissed the Wikileaks material as "pure fiction which is being sold as intelligence".

    "It's not intelligence," Gen Gul, who ran the agency from 1987 to 1989, told the BBC. "It may have a financial angle to it but more than that it is not hardcore [intelligence]. I'm an old veteran. I know."

    "It is all wrong. It's precisely as their intelligence regarding Saddam Hussein keeping weapons of mass destruction in his closet," he added. "This is all based on falsehood. That is why they are not winning, because they have no cause."

    Pakistani officials have denied that Gen Gul still works for the ISI.

    The reports also suggest:

    The Taliban has had access to portable heat-seeking missiles to shoot at aircraft
    A secret US unit of army and navy special forces, Task Force 273, has been engaged on missions to "capture or kill" top insurgents
    Many civilian casualties - caused by Taliban roadside bombs and Nato missions that went wrong - have gone unreported
    Iran is engaged in an extensive covert campaign to arm, finance and equip the Taliban and Afghan warlords allied to al-Qaeda
    'Civilian deaths'

    But the head of the Foreign Relations Committee in the US Senate said the leak came at a "critical stage" for US policy in the region.

    "However illegally these documents came to light, they raise serious questions about the reality of America's policy toward Pakistan and Afghanistan," Democratic Senator John Kerry said.

    UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said he did not think the leaks would damage the international effort in Afghanistan.

    Wikileaks says it delayed the release of about 15,000 reports from the archive as part of a "harm minimisation process demanded by our source".

    The Guardian and the New York Times say they had no contact with the original source of the leak, but spent weeks cross-checking the information.

    Earlier this year, Wikileaks posted a video on its website which it said showed the killings of civilians by a US military helicopter in Baghdad in 2007.

    A US military analyst, Bradley Manning, is awaiting trial on criminal charges of leaking the video.

    A former hacker, Adrian Lamo, said Mr Manning boasted to him about handing over military videos and 260,000 classified US embassy messages to Wikileaks.

    Wikileaks has refused to identify its source for the video or the US military documents.

    Meanwhile, Nato says it is investigating reports that as many as 45 civilians died in an air strike in Helmand province on Friday. A BBC journalist has spoken to villagers in Regey who said they witnessed the incident.

    A Nato spokesman said international forces went to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10758578
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,732
    Likes Received:
    36,182
    I read some of this stuff this morning - pretty interesting and depressing.

    This seems like it will turn out to be the Afghan war's Pentagon Papers.
     
  3. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    More like "threatens our credibility".

    Kudos to wikileaks.

    More at link.
     
  4. rimrocker

    rimrocker Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    22,272
    Likes Received:
    8,068
    Greenwald writes well...

     
  5. ToyCen428

    ToyCen428 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,323
    Likes Received:
    112
    This information is weeks old TBH.

    Reports came out about a month ago that the owner of Wikileaks has now escaped the U.S. because the U.S. government was looking for him after he announced he would soon be releasing "history-making information" exposing our government.

    This guy has balls of steal!
     
  6. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,714
    Likes Received:
    18,912
    I don't think there is anything surprising in these documents.

    We all know the Afgan war hasn't been going in the right direction and started with a terribly flawed strategy. I think you have to give Petreaus time to make changes and see if he can turn the tide of this war because what's at stake.

    The past is just a sound reminder of how terrible and risky of an affair continued war is in a foreign country. What are the implications of this information? What policy should be changed?

    You put in a new guy - you have to give that new guy a chance.
     
  7. OldManBernie

    OldManBernie Old Fogey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2000
    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    198
  8. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    56,793
    Likes Received:
    39,077
    "The archive is a vivid reminder that the Afghan conflict until recently was a second-class war, with money, troops and attention lavished on Iraq while soldiers and Marines lamented that the Afghans they were training were not being paid."

    Yes, Afghanistan was a "second class war" thanks to a second class President, George W. Bush. Hell, make that a President with no class. This is exactly what I have been saying here for years. George Bush created a god-awful mess in Iraq and, success being just too much for the man in Afghanistan, proceeded to totally **** up the one foreign policy success worth mentioning post-9/11. What a freakin' idiot, but many have known that for a very long time. :(


    The documents — some 92,000 reports spanning parts of two administrations from January 2004 through December 2009 — illustrate in mosaic detail why, after the United States has spent almost $300 billion on the war in Afghanistan, the Taliban are stronger than at any time since 2001.

    As the new American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David H. Petraeus, tries to reverse the lagging war effort, the documents sketch a war hamstrung by an Afghan government, police force and army of questionable loyalty and competence, and by a Pakistani military that appears at best uncooperative and at worst to work from the shadows as an unspoken ally of the very insurgent forces the American-led coalition is trying to defeat
    .

    The material comes to light as Congress and the public grow increasingly skeptical of the deepening involvement in Afghanistan and its chances for success as next year’s deadline to begin withdrawing troops looms.

    The archive is a vivid reminder that the Afghan conflict until recently was a second-class war, with money, troops and attention lavished on Iraq while soldiers and Marines lamented that the Afghans they were training were not being paid.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/world/asia/26warlogs.html?_r=1&no_interstitial


    And thanks to the OP for posting this. I've been generally staying out of threads started by people I have on ignore. This is a refreshing change.
     
  9. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    43,148
    Likes Received:
    25,188
    Damn, I missed this
     
  10. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    18,222
    Likes Received:
    13,423
    This is why you don't trust claims of "state secrets" or "national security" at face value. The entire concept is predicated on a boldfaced lie.

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1SwzQ30_kCU&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1SwzQ30_kCU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GRs5oaC97Js&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GRs5oaC97Js&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
     
  11. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    53,666
    Likes Received:
    41,546
    At the moment from what I have been hearing of these docs is that they need to be taken with a grain of salt. Most of this is raw data sometimes written in the heat of battle a lot of the material could speak more about the fog of war than it does about what is the actual state of things in Afghanistan.

    That said from what I have seen so far of the documents in general they do corroborate things that have been known about Afghanistan in regard to problems with the ISI and civillian casualties. Lets keep in mind though that these documents are from prior to the latest strategy which places civillian safety over the safety of US troops.

    Just to add I just saw on ABC News that the hacker that the US soldier leaked the info too turned in the soldier because he felt he was endangering lives.
     
    #11 rocketsjudoka, Jul 26, 2010
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2010
  12. orbb

    orbb Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,045
    Likes Received:
    16
    funny how this "leak" is calibrated to a call for more funding. wikileaks is a 5th column.
     
  13. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,719
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    I don't see what you think will change. It will probably always be a craphole where growing drugs is the best money maker for some seriously poor people.

    We should GTFO asap.
     
  14. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,714
    Likes Received:
    18,912
    Patreaus has shown he can turn a really bad situation around. He did it in Iraq...and I think it is worth a year to see if he can do something in Afghanistan.

    The stakes here are really high. We can lose this war, but the Taliban and Al Qaeda have attacked us numerous times, and they will continue to do so. To think if we just leave it will end everything is rather naive.

    Emboldened by victory, the terrorist will once again turn Afganistan into a training ground for future attacks across the globe. And they will be even more emboldened and can claim victory.

    We'd have lost the war on terror - at least the part with the sword. And when you deal with Al Qaeda, there is no pen.
     
  15. Phillyrocket

    Phillyrocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    13,721
    Likes Received:
    10,192
    But what would be considered a victory? Killing Bin Laden? The problem with "The War on Terror" is that it can never be completely obliterated as long as one terrorist still lives. Even if you could kill them all new ones would just spring up. So what constitutes victory and justification to withdraw?
     
  16. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,714
    Likes Received:
    18,912
    A victory would be leaving Afghanistan with a sane and stable gov't in place that wasn't bent on blowing up the world.
     
  17. Child_Plz

    Child_Plz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2010
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    64
    Iraq and Afghanistan are different tho. Iraq had a previously established somewhat organized police force and army, their infrastructure is more urban than that for Afghanistan, they also don't have the already established regional warlords so that means it is much easier to run the country with a strong central power. Above all it has something Afghanistan doesn't have, Oil.

    We defeated Al Qada in Iraq easier because they didn't exist in Iraq until Sadam was overthrown, while in Afghanistan they and the Taliban have a established base.
     
  18. Child_Plz

    Child_Plz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2010
    Messages:
    705
    Likes Received:
    64
    That probably won't happen for another 10, 15 years, if not more.

    Afghanistan's power still lie in the hands of regional warlords, and not with the current government (one that most Afghanis consider incompetent and corrupt, probably true on both counts).
    Even with the troop levels we have now, the Afghanistan government and the US forces only have control over the major cities.
     
  19. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,714
    Likes Received:
    18,912
    So we should leave and let Al Qaeda set-up it's camps again? Just let them plot attacks and use Afganistan as their "base" of operations?
     
  20. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,714
    Likes Received:
    18,912
    So there are differences. That's true, but I doubt Patreaus is using a cookie cutter strategy here.

    It will take some radical new ideas to establish peace in Afghanistan such as allying with Taliban sympathetic warlords who actually still don't share their philosophy. But most of all, the U.S. have to give the Afghani people a reason to believe they have a shot at having a normal nation.

    Patreaus won iraq not through some guerrilla strategy or military tactic, he won it through political alliances and an understanding of the different groups and their motivations. He'll need to do something similar, but not exactly the same, in Afghanistan. Give warlords reasons to stop fighting the u.s. He can do that.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now