1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

U.S. transportation chief: Houston needs to 'get its act together' on light rail

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by da1, Dec 18, 2013.

  1. da1

    da1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    101
    U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood likes Houston's light rail that's up and running but warns that regional transit officials have squandered opportunities the past decade by not building greater consensus.

    "The region needs to get its act together," LaHood said during a brief question and answer session after an unrelated news conference Wednesday in Houston.

    Metropolitan Transit Authority board Chairman Gilbert Garcia conceded a tarnished transit image and political opposition has slowed progress, but the past three years have seen Metro make significant progress.

    "It may not go the pace we all want but we've gone very far," he said.

    No more free rides: Metro to add fare enforcement to rail line

    Going further, Garcia said, will take more buy-in from local congressional and statehouse lawmakers.

    Though the Main Street line has been a success, and three more lines are under construction, LaHood said the area is coming up short because more hasn't been done to extend lines to the suburbs where most people live.

    He said he spent the morning in Houston talking about projects to extend transit farther from the downtown area. Suburban taxpayers who supported referendums in 2003 and 2012 especially have demonstrated a desire for development, only to have officials shortchange them.

    "The fact that these people voted for a referendum and are paying these taxes and have never seen any benefit from it is just not right," LaHood said.
    LaHood, who is stepping down as transportation secretary as soon as a successor is confirmed, said in other cities that have won rail funding, it's been because everyone from City Hall to Capitol Hill has shown their support for transit funding. In Houston, that hasn't been the case, and that's going to hamper getting federal funds.

    "If there is not going to be universal agreement then it is not going to happen," LaHood said.

    Politicians are not the only Houston-area people divided on the merits of rail. Many taxpayers inside and outside the city remain skeptical that light rail is right for Houston, and that the investment thus far has paid off. For them, a lack of federal investment is a good thing.

    Others have pressed for greater investment, but have largely not garnered the support to advance projects like the University Line, linking downtown with the Galleria area.

    'Buy America'

    Two of the three light rail lines under construction received a combined $900 million in federal transit funds, via an agreement signed in 2011 that followed Metro nearly losing the money because of "Buy America" provisions tied to the funds.

    The federal agreement followed years of contentious battles about Metro's internal policies and political fights between Houston-focused rail backers and suburban officials that continue.

    Rep. John Culberson, a longtime critic of efforts to run rail down Richmond Avenue westward toward Loop 610, has opposed any federal funds aimed at the University Line because he views the line as unaffordable.

    In a statement, he said he was glad LaHood recognized Houston's light rail deficiencies.

    Culberson weighs in

    "Metro has squandered millions of taxpayer dollars, and they cannot afford to build any more rail beyond the three lines already under construction," Culberson said. "I look forward to the day when Metro publicly admits what they have privately told me: They can't afford to expand light rail in the city."
    Metro officials, meanwhile, think the upcoming lines will help persuade people to put more money toward rail. Garcia, the Metro chairman, predicted the opening next year of the North, East and Southeast lines will allow more people to see the benefits of rail.

    http://www.houstonchronicle.com/new...tation-chief-Houston-needs-to-get-4481101.php
     
  2. Haymitch

    Haymitch Custom Title
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    27,977
    Likes Received:
    23,159
    Haymitch: Ray LaHood needs to 'go suck a lemon' right now
     
  3. GanjaRocket

    GanjaRocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    106
    i don't know why they couldn't have built El trains.

    cheap bastards, this makes rush hour traffic worse on OST. Epic fail rail
     
  4. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost not wrong
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    47,374
    Likes Received:
    16,884
    Typical starve the beast strategy.

    Defund a program to the point where it can't succeed or function, and then proclaim the program a failure and the operators inept, and kill the program.
     
  5. sammy

    sammy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2002
    Messages:
    18,949
    Likes Received:
    3,528
    In before texx tells us that we all like to drive big trucks with shotguns inside them instead of taking public transportation.
     
  6. GanjaRocket

    GanjaRocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    106
    are you saying this was a conspiracy from the start?

    im sure our ****ty fail rail is here to stay.. as they keep building more of these fail rails.


    but for everyone's sake, elevate the damn tracks at big intersections! a kid playing with thomas trains knows how to do that for chrissakes.

    but some bigwig engineers with degrees cant even. fck them.
     
  7. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost not wrong
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    47,374
    Likes Received:
    16,884
    It's not a conspiracy, that's just politics as usual.
     
  8. CrazyDave

    CrazyDave Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,027
    Likes Received:
    439
    Not that "light rail" would be a bad thing, but he probably owns "light rail stock."
     
    #8 CrazyDave, Dec 18, 2013
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2013
  9. Svpernaut

    Svpernaut Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    8,446
    Likes Received:
    1,027
    You do realize that plenty of politicians and government officials squander opportunities and dollars on their own, right? The FTA gave the city a $900 million grant, and they've come to the realization that much of that has been squandered.
     
  10. Severe Rockets Fan

    Severe Rockets Fan Takin it one stage at a time...

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    5,923
    Likes Received:
    1,490
    Hmmm, I'm on the fence about a light rail...probably bc I know I'd never ride it after the horrible experiences I had riding the rail they have in the medical center. A quick look at Ray LaHood shows he's always been a big proponent of light rail and would probably say it's a good idea even when presented with information like this,

    "No mass transit system in the country charges riders enough to offset the expenses of running trains—much less the cost of capital. Amtrak loses hundreds of millions a year, and it makes an operating profit only on its somewhat high-speed Acela Express between Boston and Washington."

    http://reason.com/archives/2011/04/28/taking-taxpayers-for-a-ride/singlepage

    So basically, when it comes to light rail, if we ever bought a system for it, we'd always be paying for it...even the folks that never ride it. No thanks...

    I'm sure road travelers provide subsides too, but rail isn't above them either...we'll be paying either way...personally I prefer convenience of leaving and coming when I please and not at some conductor's schedule.
     
  11. GanjaRocket

    GanjaRocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    106

    in Houston, if you can't make money off of it, its useless. Other places have a literal necessity for good transit. So its worth it, overall economically, to spend the dough.

    just the consequences of so much cheap land and good ol boy lobbies
     
  12. da1

    da1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    101
    People should have the option. Roads, particularly highways, lose a lot of money. And have much higher maintenance costs than rail. But nobody ever talks about that.
     
  13. GanjaRocket

    GanjaRocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    106
    its not just about the point of expense..

    think about how much money the roads and highways make for people that have vested interest in government. it comes back to offset the expense through the system
     
  14. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    light rail is not the answer for Houston
     
  15. BleedRocketsRed

    BleedRocketsRed Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,089
    Likes Received:
    603
    Hey transportation dofus,

    **** YOU.
     
  16. RedRedemption

    RedRedemption Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    32,470
    Likes Received:
    7,648
    Difference it we use them everyday. Its not just monetary cost, its utility cost. Shoehorning public transportation in a city that doesn't need it yet is going to piss a lot of people off and hurt your own cause.

    In most cities people cry for more/better public transportation infrastructure.
    In Houston we cry for more roads and highways.

    There's a culture difference that prevents public transportation from taking off.
     
  17. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    If you're hurt and need an ambulance, my guess is that you'd prefer to have sufficient highway capacity to allow for the medical crew to arrive in a timely fashion. I doubt you'd want them to take the toy train and make all the stops, lol.
     
  18. Commodore

    Commodore Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    30,950
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    go pound sand DC, get some other suckers to fund your rail boondoggles
     
  19. BDswangHTX

    BDswangHTX Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,788
    Likes Received:
    123
    light rail was just not the way to go.

    I do understand that some posters here are riders, and good for them, but in reality the other 98% of Houstonians rely on personal transportation; and that's not going to change anytime soon.

    Houston expansion and development behooves it's people to own cars, so that they may drive from the suburbs, into town. Not the case for some, but for most.

    Deal with it.
     
  20. da1

    da1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    101
    Rush hour traffic is pretty bad. It would help a lot of people. If you build lines in areas where people travel anyway that would have great ridership.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now