Spurs sued for sitting players vs Heat claim they violated state law

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by GRENDEL, Jan 15, 2013.

  1. GRENDEL

    GRENDEL Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    14,833
    Likes Received:
    613
    By Darren Rovell | ESPN.com

    The San Antonio Spurs are being sued by a lawyer who is alleging that the team violated the state's deceptive and fair trade practices law.

    On Monday, Larry McGuinness filed a class action suit in Miami-Dade County, stating that the team's head coach, Gregg Popovich, "intentionally and surrepticiously" sent their best players home without the knowledge of the league, the team and the fans attending the Nov. 29 game against the Heat. McGuinness contends that he, as well as other fans, "suffered economic damages" as a result of paying a premium price for a ticket that shouldn't cost more.

    Before the game, Popovich sent Tim Duncan, Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili and Danny Green back to San Antonio, saying that he believed that resting his top players for their fourth game in five days was a smart decision.

    Even though players aren't guaranteed to play at any time, the lines are a little more blurred since teams charge fans more to attend games versus better teams. When asked how he thought the fans felt, Popovich admitted at the time that it wasn't ideal.

    "If I was taking my 6-year-old son and daughter to the game, I would want them to see everybody," Popovich said. "And if they weren't there, I'd be disappointed."

    It's often assumed that fans might not see certain high-profile players because of injury, but McGuinness said this was different given that all of the top players were not available to play.

    "It was like going to Morton's Steakhouse and paying $63 for porterhouse and they bring out cube steak," said McGuinness, who said he bought his ticket on the resale market. "That's exactly what happened here."

    NBA commissioner David Stern apologized to fans for Popovich's decision at the time, calling it "unacceptable." Days later, the NBA, which is not named as a defendant in this case, fined the team $250,000.

    Some could argue that the Heat fans got their money's worth. That's because the team barely beat the undermanned Spurs, 105-100 that night. McGuinness said that doesn't mean a game with the Spurs top players couldn't have been more exciting.

    McGuinness said he didn't believe that the Spurs were served with the lawsuit yet. Team spokesman Tom James said he was not in the position to comment on the case.


    http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8847216/san-antonio-spurs-sued-lawyer-resting-top-players
     
  2. superfob

    superfob Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    51
    Their employees, not slaves.

    Can I sue a Mickey D's because my favorite cashier didn't come to work? They paid for a game between the Spurs and Heat, not player X vs player Y. What would happen if the Spurs traded all their top players the night before so they couldn't suit up?
     
  3. MambaJoe

    MambaJoe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    103
    This is getting ridiculous. People suing teams now because that team didn't play some of their players... Coach Pop had a good reason to sit out his players and plus, he has the rights to sit whoever he wants.

    Even though that guy paid for expensive tickets, it was still a good game. This needs to end now. People will start suing NBA teams for stupid reasons like resting their star players before playoffs and such. Each team has the right to rest whoever they want.
     
  4. Aleron

    Aleron Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    10,619
    Likes Received:
    267
    There's a reason medical malpractice insurance is twice as expensive in Dade County than any other area in the country....
     
  5. CometsWin

    CometsWin Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,388
    Likes Received:
    932
    The cashier at Mickey D's isn't the product.
     
  6. KingLeoric

    KingLeoric Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    42
    I can understand the complain but a lawsuit?!

    A ticket is a just a ticket. It doesn't matter what the reason is, no player is guaranteed to play.

    If a player is injured right before the game (or even in during the game), you can't tell him "You have to get back on the court and play, cause those tickets were already sold". Rudy Gay has missed a few games for "personal reasons" this season and they were not announced until right before the games started.

    Furthermore can people sue Hawks for scoring 20 points in the first half? They paid to see more than that didn't they?
     
  7. adeelsiddiqui

    adeelsiddiqui Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2003
    Messages:
    9,639
    Likes Received:
    194
    So if the Heat suck with Wade and decide to bench him; the fans can sue the team? At the end of the day, most of the suits at the game don't care about winning, they care about seeing star players so they can "talk about sports" at work the next day.
     
  8. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    25,066
    Likes Received:
    777
    I'm glad the Spurs got sued. That's some bush-league crap Pop pulled. I think it'll be settled quickly and we won't ever hear how the lawsuit story ended - NDA and all.

    Nobody pays to see Rudy Gay. ;)
     
  9. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    16,311
    Likes Received:
    463
    Not that any analogy is perfect, but the more accurate one would be you go to a McDonald's, they have the Quarter Pounder up there, you order it, pay for it, wait for it, they call your order, you pick it up, and its a single chicken nugget, and they say sorry, we decided to send the quarter pounders back.

    That said, what would likely happen in that case is the customer would be refunded, if not by that location, than by McDonald's corporate (assuming a big enough stink was made).

    I don't think the Spurs should be getting sued. I do think that fans should at a minimum be refunded the "premium" they paid for the "premium" ticket, but more likely be refunded the whole ticket... by the league, who already fined the Spurs.

    The league also needs to set up rules which say this can't happen... IF they decide those are the rules they want to have.
     
  10. MorningZippo

    MorningZippo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,182
    Likes Received:
    62
    That legal standing is total crap, and will be shot down in court. Move along ladies
     
  11. ArtV

    ArtV Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    6,134
    Likes Received:
    145
    Buying a ticket against the Spurs doesn't guarantee you a seat to watch Timmy and Co. It only guarantees you a seat to watch the Spurs players...which they saw. Now you might assume and hope for Timmy and I can totally understand the disappointment when the starters weren't even in the building but to sue for this is ridiculous.

    I think it's more like going to Morton's, ordering the porterhouse and instead of getting a choice custom porterhouse cut, they cooked you up a porterhouse that they bought at Randalls. It might not be quite as good but it's still a porterhouse. If the menu doesn't specify then you ordered, paid for and got a porterhouse.
     
  12. wekko368

    wekko368 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    5,746
    Likes Received:
    150
    I doubt the Spurs settle such a ridiculous lawsuit. The guy paid to see the Spurs. He saw the Spurs.
     
  13. coolweather

    coolweather Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,087
    Likes Received:
    57
    the 250K fine should go to the fans.
     
  14. sammy

    sammy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2002
    Messages:
    16,247
    Likes Received:
    510
    That decision also affected people that gambled on that game.
     
  15. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    25,066
    Likes Received:
    777
    It is oftentimes easier to pay a modest sum to make these things go away than actually let it go before a judge. Even if the suit was without merit, there are costs associated.

    My mother's company long ago was sued by a local resident after an industrial accident because his dog wouldn't bark thereafter. Sure, they could have beat him in court, but who wants to bother with that. So they settled.
     
  16. wekko368

    wekko368 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    5,746
    Likes Received:
    150
    Think about the precedent it sets.
     
  17. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    16,311
    Likes Received:
    463
    Except the NBA is very specific in their marketing. They don't market teams, they market players... including Duncan, Parker, etc. (more so in previous years, but still).

    In your example, if the Morton's had language on the menu, or a radio/tv/newspaper ad that specifically talked about how the porterhouse is a special porterhouse sourced blah blah blah, then they served you a cheap, Randall's one, absolutely as a customer you should be entitled to a refund. It's false advertising.

    I'm not sure what the law is, mind you, just my opinion...
     
  18. KingLeoric

    KingLeoric Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    42
    So it's Stern's fault after all.
     
  19. wekko368

    wekko368 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    5,746
    Likes Received:
    150
    How exactly does the NBA market players and not teams?

    A more appropriate analogy would be if Morton's served you the worst cut from the special porterhouse source.
     
  20. superfob

    superfob Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    51
    I disagree. The product is a basketball game. Otherwise shouldn't I be just as satisfied as seeing Duncan vs Lebron in a ping pong match?

    The product specifically for that day is the San Antonio Spurs vs Miami Heat. Not Tim Duncan's vs Lebron's. I understand that the NBA markets stars because it's easier to relate to a person instead of a team location or logo.

    Should I sue the Rockets if Lin doesn't play tonight against the Clippers because I had purchase my tickets in advance? Doesn't matter the reason why the coach opts not to play his players. As long as the correct team shows up and plays against the home team, to me that is the extent of the contract between the fan.
     

Share This Page