1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

SI.com: Nets must clear salary to sign Howard to the max

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Carl Herrera, Mar 14, 2012.

  1. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,570
    I think the following is worth noting.

    Short version: In order to clear sufficient cap room to sign Howard to a max contract straight-up, the Nets will need to (1) let Humphries go via free agency and (2) either (a) dump at least $7-8 million worth of next year's salaries (from continuing players or upcoming draft picks), or (b) let Lopez leave via free agency.

    The relevance of this math is as follows:

    1. Dwight Howard's talk of signing straight up with NJ so that NJ gets to have him while keeping important pieces and draft picks is probably kind of a bluff. NJ will have to let a good number of these pieces go in order to clear cap room for him anyway even if he foregoes the extra year and $30 mil he would have received if he's traded before the deadline.

    2. This means it makes sense for NJ to offer at least Lopez and Humphries (plus probably other pieces) for Howard in a trade right now, since they'll have to let these guys go (or give up some other assets in order to dump salary) in a straight up FA signing scenario anyway.

    3. If a team is going to accept some sort of salary dump pf, say, Farmar and Petro to help NJ sign Dwight Howard, this team should demand a high price for it-- sort of like what Morey did with agreeing to eat Jeffries' salary. I would start with Humphries (who NJ cannot afford to keep if they want to sign Howard in any case) and ask for a 1st round pick or two.

    4. Even if Dwight Howard is determined to go to NJ, a team making a "rental trade" for him may still be able to recover some assets from NJ in a S&T unless NJ manages to dump the necessary salary before the deadline. (His other possible destination, Dallas, would also need to clear a bunch of additional cap room in order to pay both he and Deron Williams the max (or near it)).

    http://nba-point-forward.si.com/201...dwight-howard-in-free-agency/#?sct=nba_bf2_a3

     
    1 person likes this.
  2. coachbadlee

    coachbadlee Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,053
    Likes Received:
    8,559
    Rockets won't do anything. They are to busy waiting for someone else to make the 1st move. Kris Hump and a pick would be perfect for this team.
     
  3. skenney1993

    skenney1993 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    550
    Likes Received:
    284
    I would be more interested in trading our 09ers for farmar,petro, and their unprotected first than dealing for okafor and a first
     
  4. quinnolivarez

    quinnolivarez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    25
    This is an extremely interesting scenario, and helps to illustrate why deals take so long to get completed. From the Rockets perspective, I'd agree to take on those salaries (Farmar and Petro) in exchange for, let's say, Hill and Flynn, since we have cap space (each player would produce a small trade exception that can make us buyers during the course of next season) if it meant we got back New Jersey's unprotected pick in addition to re-acquiring the rights to our own pick.

    What makes these kind of deals risky is that players like the 09ers can be used to match salaries in potentially larger deals, which means either a) the offer of draft picks may evaporate when another team who isn't looking for the home run deal takes NJ's offer, or b) it takes away the ability to complete a different deal for an established player, unless of course the rights to picks are exchanged.

    I'd do this deal if NJ gives us our pick back, and if
    a) Utah could be convinced to deal us Jefferson in exchange for Martin and our own 2012 pick (lottery protected), or
    b) if LA could be convinced to deal us Gasol in exchange for Scola, Dragic, Thabeet and our own 2012 pick (not the NYK pick).
     
  5. ArtV

    ArtV Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    6,891
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    NJ would be smart to just put the best deal on the table to Orlando. It won't benefit them that much to wait and Howard could change his mind - again. Like a car salesman close to a deal, you don't want your client leaving in the hopes that he/she will be back. You close the deal even if it means waving the cost of the "undercoating".
     
  6. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    42,515
    Likes Received:
    5,922
    Nets don't need Lopez or Humphries if they get Howard. Both guys are goners.
     
  7. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    16,146
    Likes Received:
    10,355
    True but I could see them trading one or both at the deadline for picks/lower contract youngs/etc. Helps their tanking this season and gets them something back in return.

    What would you give up for Brook Lopez?
     
  8. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,068
    Likes Received:
    11,768
    Would McHale and Morey want Lopez?

    If yes, send Thabust's expiring and the NY pick.

    Then watch Morey mealy-mouth Lopez in the offseason so no one will offer him big money, thus driving down his asking price etc etc...
     
  9. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    46,834
    Likes Received:
    18,551
    Humphries is a free agent next year so he comes off their books regardless.
     
  10. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    42,515
    Likes Received:
    5,922
    Humphries is expiring. Lopez is coming off a major injury. Neither guy has much trade value at the moment. Nets need both salaries to come off the books to get Howard and should keep them until the end of the season.

    I've never liked Brook Lopez. IMO, it's hard for Cs that are soft, don't rebound and don't D-up to help a team win championships.
     
  11. jopatmc

    jopatmc Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,368
    Likes Received:
    387

    Not much. He's injured all the time and he constantly sucks when he goes up against better NBA centers. His stats are hollow. He piles them up against nobodies and then when he actually runs into a big that plays D, he sucks.

    Here's the other thing. Do you really think if NJ threw Orlando their pick, plus our pick (14+) plus Lopez and expirings that that deal is going to beat what the Rockets are able to give them, which includes among other things taking back salary from them (either Hedo or Duhon/QRich). The NJ deal locks them into mediocrity. They wind up with a big man who they will likely have to pay $10 mill per season or more for and two draft picks, most likely outside the top 5, which weighs down their roster with more salary, and they're still stuck with all the other junk on their roster. It just doesn't make sense.

    Now, look at it from Dwight and DWill's perspective.

    If Orlando trades Dwight there, he's playing with DWill, and whatever else NJ can sign. Who is that going to be? Kirilenko? Okay. Then what?? This is Miami's situation from a couple years ago but the 3 players aren't nearly as good. They'll likely make the playoffs and peter out in the first or 2nd round. No depth.

    For Dwight to sign there outright, he's gotta give up a good chunk of change since he can't use his Birds rights to get max raises and 5 years. Then NJ still has to clear the deck for him and DWill. They gotta lose Lopez most likely, because somebody is gonna offer the guy $10 mill per season. If they keep Lopez, they're basically locked in for next season with the rest of those pieces parts minus Kris. The article is right. For them to sign Dwight, they gotta dump salary, which means in all likelihood they lose their lottery pick.

    And here's the other thing. Morey holds the leverage on Orlando. All Morey has to do is threaten to turn that deal with NJ and give them their cap space and Orlando is up a creek without a paddle. Orlando is already up a creek with not much of a paddle.

    In my opinion, all signs are pointing to Dwight coming to Houston. The only thing that will change it at this point is:

    1. Orlando decides to "roll the dice" and keep him.

    or

    2. Orlando finds a trade partner that will offer up significant assets because Dwight will agree to extend with that team.
     
  12. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    19,184
    Likes Received:
    28,043
    It would be smart of the Nets to give the Magic whatever they want to get Howards bird rights.

    1.Staying over the cap assures you of having the MLE to dole out to a player wanting to hop on the bandwagon,

    2.Keeps Howard away from predatory teams like the rockets, that just may be able to actually convince him to stay. Maybe not likely, but are any of their players really worth taking that risk.

    3.Thy are gonna have to dump basically their entire roster to sign him in free agency anyway.

    What is the most Orlando could want
    Draft picks (which are all gonna suck anyway with these two)
    Brook Lopez (D-12 obviously makes him expendable)
    Humphries (gonna be gone anyhow for cap space)

    Are really gonna take this risk to keep Marshon Brooks
     
  13. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,275
    Likes Received:
    13,000
    great post... well thought out.

    You can certainly see how difficult it is to pull the trigger on a trade. However, Morey's just got to make a decision at some point.

    I think DM would be stupid not to take the proposed NJ deal you point out, with our without the following trades. I understand that he has positioned the team for cap flexibility, but I don't think he truly believes that flexibility will help land him a Deron Williams type. He wants to and is most likely to land a "big fish" via trade. So I doubt he's as concerned about cap flexibility.

    So a trade of Hill, Flynn for Farmar, Petro, NJ 2012 Unprotected first, Re-acqurie our own pick we traded them would be a steal.

    It would give Morey so so so many assets to work with. In this upcoming draft alone, he'd have a VERY high lotto pick, and likely 2 early to mid-teen picks in worst case scenario. Plus all the future picks to trade. And, as your follow-up trades suggest, he'd still basically have all his real tangible assets to move for a player. Which means instead of Gasol he can target Josh Smith, or Carmelo (if he wants), or Jefferson/Milsap or whomever...

    it'd be a steal of a trade with NJ, which is likely why, even given their need for increased cap space, they'd never offer it.
     
  14. jopatmc

    jopatmc Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,368
    Likes Received:
    387
    I think Morey should talk to NJ about doing that deal to get Orlando to trade us Dwight.
     
  15. krnxsnoopy

    krnxsnoopy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,364
    Likes Received:
    814
    :confused:
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now