http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ba...n-State-brings-back-the-bridge?urn=nba,249317 lock if posted...
finally a team does it right....the logo at least, will have to wait and see the actual uni on a player..
2010 home uni towards the bottom. Too busy in the front for me. Has too much of the Denver Nuggets color scheme.
The logo looks sweet. I dont like the look of the jersey. The Chris Mullin era 88-97 unis is their best I think. Warriors and Denver always have the good uniform colors and designs to work with
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Don't the Warriors actually play in Oakland? Why does "Secondary Logo B" have "SF" in it? Why is there the Golden Gate Bridge the logo when it's not part of Oakland? I mean, I get that they're supposed to represent all of the Bay Area and that they originally relocated to San Francisco from Philly. But if I were a proud Oakland resident, it would upset me that the Warriors are trying to identify more with San Francisco while still playing its home games in Oakland. There's a reason why they started calling themselves "Golden State" when they moved from San Francisco in '71. /end rant Really, I don't care that much. But if I were an Oaklander, I'd be pissed.
These cuts look the best for NBA jersey's.... I wish the Rockets would somehow go back to these cut's.
"The San Francisco Warriors of Oakland" There's actually 2 separate bridges in the area, The Golden Gate Bridge and the Bay Bridge. The Bay Bridge is also called the San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge, and it connects San Fran and Oakland. I'm willing to bet they're putting a logo of a general nameless bridge so people can call it what they want. They can be cheesy and make the logos symbolic of things. Like "bridging" the eras together. And the SF is a secondary logo, not the main one. And as you mentioned they already have the "Golden State" name so they can be ambiguous and cheat. (not my pic)
I'm aware of that bridge, but nobody cares about it. Everyone's going to look at that logo and think "Golden Gate".
