New State Law Regulating Ride Sharing Moving Through Legislature clearing Lyft+Uber Return to Cities

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Brando2101, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:34 PM.

  1. Brando2101

    Brando2101 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,124
    Likes Received:
    210
    A law has passed 2nd reading in the Texas House that would wipe out all regulations passed in Texas cities. It would move regulation over to the state and change the background check policies to be in line with most other US states. That would clear Lyft to return to Houston and Lyft/Uber to return to Austin.

    The house has to pass it on a 3rd reading and then it needs to go to the Senate. The Senate is working on their own bill that has majority support so there does not seem to be any chance an agreement isn't worked out. The primary differences between the two approaches is that the House moves regulation to the state and the senate bills keep regulation in the city but change the rules. It makes more sense to move it to the state if you are passing state laws. I'm wondering if Lyft/Uber will still pay a percentage of revenue to the cities they operate in or if it'll go to the state instead.

    http://www.mystatesman.com/news/tra...ate-ride-hailing-bill/5vi1We6kKidi2TqGKkbNvJ/

     
  2. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    38,174
    Likes Received:
    1,960
    Big gubbermint always tellin us whut to do.
     
    REEKO_HTOWN likes this.
  3. Bäumer

    Bäumer Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,490
    Likes Received:
    155
    I am guessing this means Galveston will get Uber back? Hopefully this passes! I don't want to drink and drive when I am there so we take it easy or pay $15 for a cab to take us 1 mile.
     
  4. Fantasma Negro

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,235
    Likes Received:
    992
    Just trying to keep up here, so ppl are against background checks?
     
  5. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    25,947
    Likes Received:
    1,249
    I think uniformity across the state is a good thing. However, I didn't see any mention of my main concern, which is the inequity with cab services. I assume they've done nothing to address the inequity, so I don't think I can be in favor.
     
  6. Brando2101

    Brando2101 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,124
    Likes Received:
    210
    It's fingerprint checks.
     
  7. Fantasma Negro

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,235
    Likes Received:
    992
    What's wrong with that? Teachers, cops and bank managers gotta do it, why not the stranger driving you around that in some cases knows your home address.
     
  8. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    40,742
    Likes Received:
    2,331
    Question: Would this literally destroy cab companies? Does this favor Uber over Taxis?

    It seems like this is basically. . . .taking the job of protecting the public and verifying identity and standards. . . .
    out of state hands and into corporate hands
    With the idea that Corporate hands will do a better job and won't screw over the public
    whic . .. make me uncomfortable because for the $$$ . . they will definitely screw us

    Rocket River
     
  9. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    460
    Do they not have finger prints?
     
  10. jo mama

    jo mama Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    9,603
    Likes Received:
    426
    when ridesharing companies switch over to driver-less cars this will all be a moot point. for now though, its pretty obvious that many of our politicans are bought and paid for by rideshare lobbyists. and for many i think they are in favor simply b/c liberal austin is against.

    republicans sure love local control, right?
     
  11. Jugdish

    Jugdish Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,476
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    They better not have fingerprints if they want to get away with murdering 15-year-old girl passengers, as I'm told all Uber drivers aspire to do.
     
  12. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    25,947
    Likes Received:
    1,249
    Yes, I think it'll literally destroy cab companies. I don't think this is really about public safety at all. Cabs are basically safe, and Ubers are basically safe. But, we made cabs safe with some antiquated heavy-handed regulation and we made Ubers safe with market forces, transparency, and digitization. The cab approach was an exchange -- we get to regulate you, but in exchange we'll erect barriers around your jobs and prop up your prices so you can get a decent return. Uber knocks those barriers down. So, politicians who give Uber a hard time on background checks aren't doing it for safety, they do it to honor the deal with cabbies by trying to lock Uber out. It's like a union fight. Uber is the union buster. In the long run, I think it should happen. Cabs need to modernize. But, I think this transition is seedy. When the market landscape changes and puts a corporation out of business -- like the way the internet is bankrupting department stores -- that's just the way the cookie crumbles. It's sad though when it puts little proprietorships out of business, especially ones that invested on the assurance of government that they'd be protected.
     
  13. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    32,232
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    The idea that Uber and Lyft can't operate in a regulated environment is silly. Rideshare Austin, Fasten, and all the other random replacements that work just fine for most people in Austin suggest otherwise.

    Agree with those that say this has nothing to do with safety or what's best for anyone - Uber/Lyft just successfully lobbied for their view of the world. As long as cabs and rideshares are on a fairly level playing field, I don't see why cities shouldn't have freedom to set up their own low or high regulation environments based on what their people want.
     
  14. Ziggy

    Ziggy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    27,582
    Likes Received:
    1,462
    As a consumer, it doesn't matter to me personally. I'm going to use Uber regardless. And if I were to get into a cab I'm not going to feel any safer than I would in the Uber. Ultimately I don't care, just drive me somewhere as hassle-free as possible. If you're worried about it then don't use it.
     
  15. leroy

    leroy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    19,911
    Likes Received:
    851
    Yeah...me, too. There's a definitive value to me, especially being in The Woodlands, to having Uber. Much much cheaper to take to go into the city for events where I plan to drink. It would be nice for them to have competition in Lyft. I used Uber often when I lived in Austin and it sucked when they got rid of it. I understand the call for the background checks but no one is forcing you to use these services if you don't feel comfortable with it.
     
  16. Jontro

    Jontro Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Messages:
    21,275
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    thread title not long enough
     
Loading...

Share This Page