Ok, I totally agree with you on Chuck and players alike having an asterisk next to their names for not having a title. Here's what I have trouble with. The Warriors, a team that went 73-9, and were literally one game away from winning it all AND setting an amazing record add Durant. They add Durant to ostensibly win one game. One game. How does that one game add to his legacy? If he stays in GS for years to come, maybe it ends up being more and more, but right now we are talking about one game. How do you not put an asterisk next to the title he wins this year? Even by extension next year too? Are they going to win more than that? I don't think so. History also says probably not. So I guess we will see. If he does, then you are spot on. If Durant and the Warriors don't ruin the NBA, I don't know if I see him doing anything more to add to his legacy than he did in OKC. He's a really talented player, and believe me, I LOVE HIM SCREWING OVER OKC. I LOVE IT. Take that you a**holes who stole the Sonics. I hate OKC almost as much as I hate the Warriors "fan" base.