Can you further explain this chart to me, are the high numbers good or bad? Because high being bad makes sense to me. You see, Obama has an 8, and Trump has 1.8, so Obama is more than 4x worse than Trump according to your chart.
Funny, trump didn't seem to have any issues with congressional investigations when Obama was President...
Does it seem odd that the current chief law enforcement officer of the land has said he will refuse to testify to the congress because they have said they will subpoena him if he refuses to testify? Let that sink in...
I guess whitaker and the trump doj will need to come up with a new excuse for not showing tomorrow...
how is the House investigation different from the Senate investigation? serious question. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...nce-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536
Perhaps one is led by republicans and one is lead by Democrats? And the republican leading the senate subcommittee has had a few questions raised... https://www.thedailybeast.com/senat...for-trump-while-russia-attacked-2016-election https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/richard-burr-donald-trump-north-carolina-235319 But getting back to the "no direct evidence" statement. First, trump and his supporters have conveniently left off the word "direct". Important to know what the senate subcommittee considered "direct" and "indirect". Second, the Democrat leader of that same subcommittee disagreed... And even the investigators... And last, the senate subcommittee really can't investigate criminal charges... that needs Mueller. So as we have been before, we wait as its all up to Mueller and the separate NY and VA investigations.