1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

ESPN Insider: Expansion Draft - Interesting Info

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Deuce, Nov 7, 2003.

  1. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,577
    Likes Received:
    35,648
    Can the Bobcats save the NBA?

    By Chad Ford, NBA Insider
    Thursday, November 6 Updated: November 7 9:03 AM ET

    We may be 360 days away from the Charlotte Bobcats first real game in the NBA.

    But for the 29 NBA teams already in the league, there is an intense interest, bordering on obsession, with the league's 30th franchise.

    At a time of year when teams are already dispatching armies of scouts in search of the next great draft prospect, the Bobcats armies aren't just hanging around college campuses and international arenas.

    Bobcats GM Bernie Bickerstaff and the rest of his scouts are coming to an arena near you. Their goal? Find the perfect player to pluck off another team's squad during the 2004 NBA Expansion Draft.

    The Expansion Draft, which will take place sometime between the end of the NBA Finals and the 2004 NBA Draft, allows the Bobcats to select players from the existing teams in the NBA.

    While the league is still finalizing all the rules of the expansion draft (teams expect an official memo from the league to come sometime this month) many of the rules are already in the collective bargaining agreement. Insider has talked to league and team sources to get a handle on what is likely to take place on expansion draft night. While things are always subject to change and interpretation, here's what is expected to take place.

    Teams are allowed to protect eight players. If they have less than eight players under contract, they must leave at least one player unprotected.

    The prospect of losing a critical player in the expansion draft has some teams wringing their hands. Teams with a deep reserve of young players like the Grizzlies, Pacers and Bucks are in danger of losing a prospect they'd prefer to keep around.

    The Bobcats are allowed to select a maximum of one player from each team. They must select a minimum of 14 players overall and can take a maximum of 29.

    To many GMs, the expansion draft is a very rare opportunity. The Bobcats will eventually have a projected $29.7 million salary cap next season (two-thirds of an estimated $45 million cap), but it doesn't apply to the actual expansion draft. The Bobcats are free to select as many contracts as they like. If new owner Bob Johnson wants to spend $50 million in salaries in the draft, the league will let him.

    Combine that with a little known rule in the collective bargaining agreement that allows expansion teams to get salaries off their cap early by waiving players selected in the expansion draft before the first day of the regular season and many GMs believe that a one-time large loop hole has been blown through the league's strict cap rules.

    For you hardcore fans out there, here's the rule:


    The Salary of any player selected by an Expansion Team in an expansion draft and terminated in accordance with the NBA waiver procedure before the first day of the Expansion Team's first Season shall not be included in the Expansion Team's Team Salary, except, to the extent such Salary is paid, for purposes of determining whether the Expansion Team has satisfied its Minimum Team Salary obligation for such Season. (Article VII, Section 4)

    Teams will try to capitalize on it. The Wizards, for example, could offer their first-round pick and three million dollars (the maximum allowed by the collective bargaining agreement) to the Bobcats if the team selects Christian Laettner in the expansion draft.

    If the Bobcats bite, Laettner's $6.2 million salary for next season comes off the books in Washington, giving the Wizards roughly $10 million in cap room for Ernie Grunfeld to use in free agency. The Bobcats can then waive Laettner and preserve all of their cap space for free agency as well.

    Is cap room really worth cash and a pick?

    "Absolutely," one Eastern Conference GM told Insider. "A pick, a player and three million in cash for five or six million or more in cap room? That's priceless. Ed Tapscott will be fielding a ton of offers the next few months."

    In essence, now that the regular season has begun, the Bobcats are suddenly holding all of the power. So far, executive vice president Ed Tapscott and Bickerstaff aren't showing their hand.


    There are numerous ways a team can go in an expansion draft. Most of it depends on what Johnson is willing to spend.

    The All-Star Approach

    If he's a Mark Cuban-type owner, they could select from a plethora of stars who are expected to be left unprotected. Most teams leave players with huge contracts unprotected thinking that an expansion team won't want to spend all of their cash at once.

    However, if Johnson felt the urge to blow $50 or $60 million from the get go and put a competitive team on the floor -- he'll have the opportunity. An Insider analysis of each team's roster, and the eight players they would likely protect, left players like this unprotected: Antawn Jamison, Bonzi Wells, Tim Thomas, Brian Grant, Eddie Jones, Penny Hardaway, James Posey, Raef LaFrentz, Marcus Camby, Grant Hill and Jerome James.

    Drafting an all-star team is the most unlikely scenario. Teams leave players like this unprotected because they believe that a new team wouldn't want the burdens of expensive, long-term contracts. Besides, the general feeling around the league is that Johnson is much more conservative with his money than guys like Mark Cuban and Paul Allen. They don't expect him to break the bank to field a competitive team in Charlotte.

    New GM Bernie Bickerstaff insinuated the same thing on Wednesday. "We want to build through the draft and go young," Bickerstaff said. "It's a marathon. We won't be pressured. We hope to get guys who will become big names. . .We want young, hungry competitive guys who want to prove what they can do in the NBA. We will give them the chance to show the world what they can do. "

    The Less is More Philosophy

    The opposite (and more likely) scenario, according to some league execs, is for the Bobcats to actually take no salaries back in return. How do they do that?

    While unrestricted free agents aren't eligible for the draft, restricted free agents are. However, the restricted free agents become unrestricted if the Bobcats draft them. While the Bobcats would still retain their Bird Rights to the player (the ability to exceed the salary cap to re-sign a player with three or more years in the league), they would not have the matching rights that most teams have with restricted free agents.


    Theoretically, the Bobcats could draft a team of: Chris Mihm, Jamison Brewer, Bobby Simmons, Jannero Pargo, Joel Przybilla, Trenton Hassell, Tamar Slay, Britton Johnsen, Robert Archibald, Josh Moore, Mike Wilks, James Lang, Richie Frahm and Steve Blake, waive all of them and pay virtually nothing.

    That approach gives the Bobcats their full $29 million (minus a $6.38 million in cap holds for the fourth pick in the draft and 10 other minimum roster spots) to work with in the free-agent market.

    For all of you Kobe to Charlotte fans out there, this is the scenario where the Bobcats could, theoretically, offer Kobe a max deal to bolt L.A. and head back to Charlotte where he was drafted seven season to go.

    However, the problem with that scenario is well known in places like Denver and Salt Lake. Top free agents usually balk at signing with teams that don't have a chance to compete. The chances of Kobe or any other top-flight free-agent signing on in Charlotte are slim. That's why another approach may be warranted.

    Let's Make a Deal

    What teams are hoping is that the Bobcats take the middle road. There are as many as eight teams that have a player the Bobcats might realistically consider taking if a team offers compensation in the form of a draft pick and cash in return.

    Mock Expansion Draft
    1. Chucky Atkins
    2. Christian Laettner
    3. Bo Outlaw
    4. Tony Battie
    5. Jahidi White
    6. Eddie Robinson
    7. Cliff Robinson
    8. Bruce Bowen
    9. Jannero Pargo
    10. Mo Williams
    11. Tamar Slay
    12. Britton Johnsen
    13. Trenton Hassell
    14. Chris Mihm

    Here's a hypothetical scenario (see table on right) of how things could pan out if the Bobcats decide that stockpiling first-round picks is the way to build the franchise.

    The first eight players would all be part of larger deals that should, in each instance, land the Bobcats a future first-round pick and three million in cash.

    The total salaries the Bobcats would pick up would be $46.2 million in 2004, and $16.9 million in 2005. The Bobcats would receive $24 million in cash to offset the $46.2 million number. Because of the rules governing expansion teams, the Bobcats could then turn around and waive all eight players. Combine that with the last six players, all of whom have no guaranteed money due in 2004, and the Bobcats could walk away with eight extra first-round picks and all of their cap room for just a smidgen over $30 million.

    That's a pretty serious bargain. Would the Pistons, Wizards, Grizzlies, Celtics, Suns, Bulls, Warriors and Spurs be willing to send cash and picks the Bobcats' way?

    Probably. The move is a slam dunk for the Pistons, Wizards and Spurs. The Pistons are trying to get far enough under the cap to either re-sign Mehmet Okur or to make a major play in the free-agent market. If they could move Atkins, the Pistons are looking at $10 million in cap space next summer. Ditto for the Wizards. They cleared about $5.9 million by moving Jahidi White to the Suns on Wednesday. If they can get Laettner off the books as well, the team is looking at $10 to $11 million in room.

    The Spurs have the biggest incentive. San Antonio could theoretically clear around $15 million in cap room if they waived their free agents and got the Bobcats to take Bowen. That would give them enough to make a serious run at Kobe next summer.

    The other teams don't experience such dramatic effects, but trading a pick and cash for the cap room still makes sense. The Grizzlies, by losing Outlaw, could get around $6 million under the cap. The Warriors could get nearly $7 million under by convincing the Bobcats to take Robinson. The Suns can move out of luxury-tax land if the Bobcats would take White off their hands. The Celtics could get more luxury-tax breathing room to sign a free agent with their mid-level exception. And the Bulls would get more room re-sign their own free agents.

    This is just the tip of the iceberg. There will also be scenarios where a team might give the Bobcats a pick or cash not to select a player they had to leave unprotected.

    Anyway you slice it, for the next eight months the Bobcats are in an enviable position. With a clean cap, an escalating cap (two-thirds this season, three-fourths in 2005, a full cap in 2006) the potential to horde a massive amount of first-round picks, a good first-round pick this season and no restrictions on how high they can pick in 2005, the Bobcats have a luxury that none of the other 29 teams in the league have ever had -- the ability to build a team from scratch under the new rules of the collective bargaining agreement.

    Teams are still suffering from bad deals they made before the new CBA kicked in. Can the Bobcats learn from their mistakes and help out a few other franchises along the way? You'll have to wait seven months to find out.
     
  2. codell

    codell Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    710
    Very interesting article. Thanks for posting it Deuce.

    Interesting that Memphis is rumored to be leaving James Posey unprotected. I guess they dont think he is worth the money after all.
     
  3. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    34,114
    Likes Received:
    13,515
    One thing I'm skeptical of is his assertion that teams could pay the Bobcats to draft someone or to not draft someone.
     
  4. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    28,753
    Likes Received:
    7,040
    That expansion team is going to suck.
     
  5. Matador

    Matador Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    14
    Interesting article. Confusing but interesting. Thanks for psoting it.


    What can the Bobcats do with 29 players? :confused: I'm guessing that would go with the cut the highly paid players deal to save money off the cap. :confused: :)
     
  6. GATER

    GATER Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    JV -
    I have seen this in the Charlotte Observer (local newspaper) embedded in a quote by David Stern. IMO, it is 100% true as long as there is a regular (non-expansion) pick or picks attached to the deal.

    Deuce -
    Excellent. Thanks.


    BTW...in the Kobe to the Spurs thread, I listed that the Spurs only have six 04-05 contracts. Accoding to this article, they will have to leave at least 1 unprotected. And they can't protect Hedo or Manu who are RFA's. They could take Horry's option and them unprotect him.

    There is so much in the article, I'll need to digest it and post again later!
     
  7. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,577
    Likes Received:
    35,648
    I thought this part of the article was particularly interesting in regards to the Rockets. It seems the above scenario is exactly the scenario the Rockets were in with the Jazz and Glen Rice. We shipped off a 1st round pick and Rice for the TRADE EXCEPTION which gives us the ability to make more roster moves. It is not as good as being under the cap (like the Wiz would be in their scenario), but it gives us flexability in trade manuevers. Clearly this scenario is something MANY GMs are looking at. Yet it seemed that a ton of people on the BB were all upset at the Rockets for making this move.

    It will be really interesting to see how many overpaid players for draft picks the Bobcats will select!

    Can we promise to give the Bobcats a 2nd round pick in 2025 if they take Moochie off our hands? :D
     
  8. codell

    codell Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    19,312
    Likes Received:
    710
    Deuce,

    Good take on that.

    I mean, in theory, the Bobcats, in exchange for cash and 1st round picks, can select 8-10 guys in the expansion, release them all, and build their team almost exclusively from 1st round picks. Or, combine multiple 1st round picks for a couple of top 5 picks.

    Imagine them having 8-10 1st round picks in next summer's draft, including a couple of top 5 picks. Probably would never happen, but would be fun to watch.
     
  9. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,577
    Likes Received:
    35,648
    Exactly! It really is kind of a bizarre notion!

    I have to tell ya, if I am the Bobcats I load up on 1st round picks to get the young guys as the core foundation of the team and save money to get a few DECENT veteran FAs to lead the team. I don't keep any of those overpaid players. Just select them and cut them.
     
  10. Matador

    Matador Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,780
    Likes Received:
    14
    Let's look at this from the Rockets' perspective:

    According to hoopshype the Rockets have 9 players under contract for 2004-2005 and for some reason they don't have Jim Jackson's deal on there so that is a total of 10 players under contract. (Ameachi has a team option that I doubt we would pick up)

    Of the 10 I would protect: Francis, Yao, Cuttino, Jackson, Piatkowski and A. Griffin. Of course we have to see how Pike and AG fit in with the team.

    That leaves Cato, Taylor, Nachbar, and Moochie. Of those 4 Nachbar and Moochie are the most expendable in my opinion. (we still need to see how Boki develops over the 03-04 season) But they are both paid much, much less Cato and Taylor. I doubt Charlotte would want to take on Cato or Taylor at about 8 mil a year each for two years. So we could leave Cato and Mo Tay unprotected with the thinking that the Bobcats wouldn't want to pay that much for them.
     
  11. DallasThomas

    DallasThomas Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2002
    Messages:
    3,358
    Likes Received:
    208
    If they were willing, next year's FA pool could end up being pretty deep all of the sudden. All 29 of their picks should be BS trades like that...hell, I don't think any NBA team would pass up an opportunity to ditch the likes of a Moochie for a future first rounder. The Bobcats should just take as many of these offers as they can and then they would be able to build for the future better than any expansion team has ever had the chance to. That would then re-structure a lot of teams' salary cap situations and the FA market would would be more approachable. Lots of long/short term potential here.
     
  12. bamaslammer

    bamaslammer Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Likes Received:
    3
    For several cash-strapped clubs, this could be a one-time get out of jail free card. Wow! I know the capped-out Knicks are definitely paying attention. Now if only we could get rid of Moochie this way!
     
  13. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42,760
    Likes Received:
    2,993
    All the Knicks have to offer is cash though. Their team is full of bad contracts
     
  14. Preston27

    Preston27 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,706
    Likes Received:
    42
    pgabriel, that's the point. This is going to allow teams to get rid of bad contracts.

    Very interesting article. Hope this means bye-bye for mooch.
     
  15. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    35,193
    Likes Received:
    24,222
    All I can say is Wow!

    The expansion draft could save the NBA from lots of mistaken contracts of yesteryears.
     
  16. bigboymumu

    bigboymumu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    1

    I believe Cato would be chosen by the new franchise. He would be a cheap starting center for two years. Any legitimate center ready to contribute will not last until the 4th pick considering the shortage of centers now.
     
  17. shawn786

    shawn786 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,015
    Likes Received:
    6
    IMO, if Cato keeps playing the way he is Bobcats will pick him up in a flash if he's unprotected
     
  18. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    42,760
    Likes Received:
    2,993
    I guess the point I was making is that only teams who can offer more than cash can get the Bobcats to take these contracts off their hands. The Knicks or in no better position than any other team, unless they just have a lot more money to offer.

    Its really going to come down to draft picks I believe.
     
  19. Williamson

    Williamson JOSH CHRISTOPHER ONLY FAN
    Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    15,275
    Likes Received:
    18,496
    What I don't understand about this is theoretically it's entirely possible for them to end up with say 20 first round picks or more for say 2004 and 2005. Not to mention their own picks. Every first rounder taken is gaurunteed a three year contract. You're allowed a maximum of 15 spots on the roster. You see where I'm going with this? What then? Do you trade multiple picks for higher picks? Trade multiple picks for a player you covet? I suppose it's a nice problem to have, but I'm really curious as to how that will work out. I mean there haven't been too many drafts deep enough that you'd want to commit to an entire 12 man roster out of it for three years.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now