Chad Ford mentions it at the end of the chat. Thinks Green's range starts at 16 and could see the rockets taking him. What would you guys think?? haha http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/44280
I think he could fall to the bottom of the first round / top of the second round. Green would be an excellent complement to Parsons; both seem like "jack-of-all-trades" kind of players. If Green is still there at the bottom of the 1st / top of the 2nd, I'd try and trade for a pick to draft him.
He's really good but he really is a bad example of a tweener though he's to small for the pfs and too slow for the sfs his smarts should help him a bit but I don't think he's worth it at 16
Too high. He can be snagged lower. I actually really like this guy. Can do a lot of stuff very well and carried his Michigan State team.
Haha, Chandler Parsons - pure shooting stroke and average defense DeShawn Stevenson - NBA comparison is Michael Jordan
Ehhh, he's a good player but no thanks. Wouldn't pick him that high, and we don't really have a need for him considering we have the taller version of him in Parsons already.
"So let's take a closer look at two relatively short, stocky power forwards who are among the next names on the list: Sullinger and Draymond Green. Will these guys put up numbers? Very likely. Will they be able to guard their position? That is a much more open question and why they won't go as highly as Draft Rater places them. Green, in particular, is a massive defensive question mark." This is quoted from Hollinger's draft rater article. He puts Green at #16. However, If you can get him in second round, why bother? Personally, I think there're better prospects even in early second round.
