British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
We just got a huge sign that the US intelligence community believes the Trump dossier is legitimate http://finance.yahoo.com/news/just-got-huge-sign-us-161647845.html
Great. Tell us about how Hilary had a hand in Uranium One. Or the money she got from foreign interests. Amazing how this world works.
actually after looking at the far left today... maybe we need Mcarthy back. Man was born in the wrong era.
How is it enlightening? Do you honestly think you are getting good information from people who are paid to lie to you?
So basically you are admitting you don't know the facts, but would rather deflect and stick your head in the ground versus acknowledging that there is now strong evidence that team Trump colluded with the Russians? I guess you just don't care what lengths your alt-right candidate as to go in order to win because liberals and the darkies are a greater threat to you than a foreign power that want to see America weakened.
What are you on about? I'm not alt-right or even right for that matter. Nor do I support an alt-right candidate. You are making some assumptions, aren't you. I was merely saying that everyone in politics has a conflict of interest... left, right... far left, far right. I'm saying that Hilary was just a compromised. That's all. And as for this "darkies" business, damn, that's pretty messed up to be throwing racial slurs around on CF's and trying to pin them on other people. I reject your attitude and assumption.
I chose Smug Pepe because that's how it feels to be a Rockets fan these days. I'm glad the league wrote us off and we're whipping the MVP's team.
I will when you clarify: is this fake news where the author is deliberately lying to/deceiving their readers?
The holding company that owns the Guardian has forbidden itself to pay any dividends to owners, an arrangement set up to make sure the paper operates like a nonprofit to maintain its editorial independence. Why do you think they lie for money?
I'll clarify what I meant. I didn't see what was enlightening, so I am asking you what you found enlightening. I found the article to be based on a foreign intelligence agency... how is that a trustworthy source?
Got ya--my answer is yes, I trust that the reporting is accurate and that our intelligence agencies have enough of a belief in the material to see where the rabbit hole runs. It could be a fabrication, sure, but the FBI will make that determination if need be.