Chandler should feel offended by the Mavs

From the latest MFFL article :

6 Mavs experts were asked with this question:

Question #2: Who was the most important acquisition for the Mavs this offseason?

The verdict : Tyson Chandler 4 votes vs Chandler Parsons 2 votes

Really?

I would love to hear Parsons' reaction on this.

-----------------------------------------------------

Full comments :


Question #2: Who was the most important acquisition for the Mavs this offseason?

Landon Thomas: Tyson Chandler. The Mavs were a top 10 offense last season, but were a bottom 5 defense and rebounding team. Tyson Chandler may not be the savior like he was in 2011, but he will upgrade the defense and rebounding tremendously. He is in a similar situation that he was in 4 years ago in Dallas. People wondering about his injuries, and he is in a contract year. Can lightning strike twice in the same place? Hopefully.

Michael Dugat: This almost assuredly comes down to one of the Chandlers, Tyson or Parsons, and reasonable arguments could be made for either. While I love both acquisitions, I’ll lean towards Tyson … if only because he’s shown he can impact the game at both ends of the court, and his locker room presence, the yin to Dirk’s yang, is near legendary in Mavs lore. His ability to finish alley-oops keeps defenses honest, and should complement the playing styles of Monta Ellis, Devin Harris (who quickly bonded with Brandan Wright above the rim) and Raymond Felton. I know this is mentioned in a few of the answers, but this is obviously heavily dependent on Tyson staying on the court, healthy.

Michael Lark: The trade for Tyson Chandler was the most important acquisition for the Mavs. The Mavericks front office made no secret they intended to boost their defensive efficiency this summer for a team that continually juggled match ups at the center position. While Sammy D had his moments, he is better suited as a backup then a starter for a team contending for a title, as evidenced by the Mavs defense (102.4 points against) being ranked 19th in the NBA last year. Tyson Chandler will once again prove doubters concerned with his health and drive in a contract year wrong.

Tim Cato: As cool as it will be to see Tyson back, Chandler Parsons is clearly the more important move. He’s exactly the type of young player who can help Dallas transition into a post-Dirk period that is quickly approaching, and although he’s potentially only a Maverick for two season, he clearly likes the team and his situation in Dallas.

Rami Michail: It’s tough to decide between Parsons and Tyson, but I’m going to side with Tyson Chandler on this. He’ll give the team that emotional leader they’ve lacked since he’s been gone. Add in his rebounding and defense, which were Mavs weaknesses last season, his presence is probably the most vital of any acquisition.

Brian Gosset: Without question it HAS to be Chandler Parsons. Tyson is a big fish, but he isn’t 100 percent. Regardless, it’s an upgrade from Dalembert, but by a small margin. Parsons fills a void in the Mavs’ small forward position. Shawn Marion was great in his five years, but most times was an offensive liability. Parsons shatters that criticism. He can create off the dribble which was a weakness for Marion. He can catch and shoot, another weakness for Marion. He can pass, defend, things I’ve mentioned before.


http://mavsfansforlife.com/2014/07/24/full-court-press-1/