1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Progressive media claims they'll be "tougher" on Obama now

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by rtsy, Dec 3, 2012.

  1. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,902
    Likes Received:
    36,473
    So I guess, we see who the true hypocrite is here - it's the ******* who lobs sputtering righteous indignation all over the place and is unable to back up a single one of his claims - you and Rush are two of a kind.
     
  2. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,172
    Likes Received:
    112,817
    Who said that Greenwald is the equivalent to Limbaugh, Matthews or Hannity? I certainly did not. However, there has been controversy about some of his tactics and "facts".
     
  3. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,031
    Likes Received:
    3,879
    Sam, you're forgetting the liberal voices in the angry Buddha's head. His articles totally contradict what those voices say.
     
  4. Haymitch

    Haymitch Custom Title
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    28,003
    Likes Received:
    23,204
    I guess I just have never heard of this. The best I could find was this:

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/techno...-hat-and-is-an-embarrassment-to-the-guardian/

    A neocon blogger for the Telegraph (the rival of Greenwald's employer Guardian) says Greenwald got some stuff wrong. At the end of the article, the blogger has an edit where he retracts much of what he said in the original article.

    I've seen some statist ideologues condemn Greenwald for minor (read: irrelevant) issues over his coverage of Julian Assange and Bradley Manning, but that probably isn't what you're talking about either. So, again, I'd like to hear about what he's done to damage his reputation as a journalist.

    FWIW, I don't side with Greenwald on everything, but I do appreciate his consistency. He and Justin Raimondo are two guys I go to for world events.
     
  5. rtsy

    rtsy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    50
    I stand up for my principles - not my God-King.

    My claim is that the MAJORITY of Dems/liberals have abandoned or ignored what they once emphatically proclaimed to stand for and believe in, in favor for a loyal following to their beloved leader.

    Actually what has been proven is that they didn't really care about the issues. All they cared about was an attack on Bush.

    This cult-like following has allowed Obama to continue to continues the dismissal many basic constitutional rights without an ounce of objection - Patriot Act, NDAA, etc. etc. etc. etc. And they still don't care - or it's a mass cultish denial.
     
  6. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,902
    Likes Received:
    36,473
    Well and good - And I'm asking you to show a SINGLE SOLITARY PERSON of this mythical 50+% who has done this replete with a SPECIFIC EXAMPLE.

    It should not be difficult - there are dozens of posters on this board that fit into the "dems/liberals" category, and millions nations wide - you should be able to find at least one example if your hypothesis has any validity whatsoever.

    Is it really that much to ask? You should welcome this opportunity that I am providing you. It may lead to the foundations of *final* victory. Now, time for you to deliver the goods.
     
  7. rtsy

    rtsy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    50
    So I'm supposed to show an example of policy being ignored? Doesn't work that way. Show me examples of a majority of dems protesting Obama's continuation of Bush's polices.

    So when Politico's Dylan Byers says "For the better part of four years, progressive media has had President Barack Obama's back." - I won't argue. I don't think you should either.

    CULT.

    <iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Skw-0jv9kts" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  8. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,902
    Likes Received:
    36,473
    Yes, in fact it does work that way. It's your hypothesis, it's up to you to elaborate on it.

    Ergo, you're supposed to show a single shred of evidence to support your hypothesis that "the majority" are refuting previously-held positions - you can start by showing A SINGLE PERSON WHO DID THIS, surely the hundreds of thousands of posts on this BBS are a good place to start.


    But apparently you can't find a single one. Yet you claim this "hypocrisy" that you are unable to show exists, is your driving, motivating purpose.

    It's not, or else you'd be able to show a SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE that it exists.
     
  9. across110thstreet

    across110thstreet Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    1,389
    one of the absolute last things on my mind is what Chris Matthews is saying on MSNBC.

    what he and his network says, plays almost ZERO role into the formation of my thought process.

    yet all I read about from those with whom with I disagree, is what this guy says on air every night, especially during the Libya controversy and election night...
     
    #29 across110thstreet, Dec 4, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2012
  10. Codman

    Codman Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    6,765
    Likes Received:
    11,710
    Rtsy...such a bitter troll.
     
  11. rtsy

    rtsy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    50
    A new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that Obama, who campaigned on a pledge to close the brig in Cuba and to change national security policies he criticized as inconsistent with U.S. law and values, has little to fear politically for failing to live up to all of those promises.

    An ABC News-Washington Post poll in February 2012 found that 67 percent of moderate to conservative Democrats, along with 53 percent of liberals, now support keeping Guantanamo Bay open. (Congress denied the funding the president would have needed to close it; critics say he ducked the fight.) A month after the president took office, pledging to close it, 64 percent of Democrats wanted it closed.

    Likewise, in 2006, under Bush, 53 percent of Democrats thought the Patriot Act went too far, according to the Pew Research Center. In 2011, after the president asked for its extension, only 40 percent said it went too far. And earlier this year (before the kill list revelation) fully 77 percent of liberal Democrats supported Obama’s drone policy (the question wasn’t polled under Bush), with 55 percent of them also supporting strikes on U.S. citizens.)

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...cies/2012/02/07/gIQAFrSEyQ_story.html?hpid=z3

    But hey - liberals here gots to go be heard in that 310 page thread about Trayvon Martin, can't be worrying about Obama and due-process free assassination of 16 year old American citizens. Only a troll would do such things.
     
  12. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,902
    Likes Received:
    36,473
    Why don't you unpack that assertion.

    Why can you not oppose Florida's stand-your-ground laws as applied in the Martin case, while simultaneously not being as concerned about drone strikes that happen at terrorist/paramilitary camps in lawless parts of Yemen?

    I for one, can pretty easily distinguish between Florida and Yemen.


    Florida:

    [​IMG]

    Yemen:

    [​IMG]
     
  13. rtsy

    rtsy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    50
    Giving the President the power to assassinate US citizens without trial is a much more pressing and important issue than Florida's stand-your-ground law.
     
  14. SamFisher

    SamFisher Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    58,902
    Likes Received:
    36,473
    So you are saying the two items are distinguishable, correct? (as an aside... far more scared of every sh-thead in Florida with a gun than I am of the PResident killing me with a drone, but that's not the point...)

    Then where does the hypocrisy come in?
     
  15. Qball

    Qball Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,151
    Likes Received:
    210
    It's Obamacrat...get it right...scoreboard brahhhhhhh

    bwahahahahaha!

    self-pwnage....think critically! bwaahahahahaa




    did I mention....bwhahahahahahahaa? *snort
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. jocar

    jocar Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,869
    Likes Received:
    614
    Would like to hear more about this Obama cult you have an unhealthy obsession with.

    Does your bedroom look anything like this?
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now