1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

1million will get it. 100,000 to 240,000 will die?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by B@ffled, Apr 1, 2020.

  1. B@ffled

    B@ffled Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2019
    Messages:
    1,567
    Likes Received:
    787
    Some friends and I have been trading texts about how the number, which is a 10% to 24% mortality rate expands from the current mortality rates, either in the world (+/- 6%) or the U.S. (2.2%) ....these numbers are obviously not static. I'm using them to ask the following:

    What are the factors that expand the mortality rate to 20%, as the WH response team (both doctors) have stated. It's also interesting to note that Trump steps away and while the doctors give the rates on the broadcasts.

    My guess is that Trump is allowing the doctors to state their worst case scenarios, possibly encouraging them to, so that if things do play out favorably he can take credit for the difference if it's a substantial difference. Think about it: If he rate ends up being about 7%, that's something to use while he's campaigning.

    Am I (and my friends) missing an obvious factor? The US is ahead of the World in the mortality rate, which you'd expect. And now people are staying at home and new treatments are becoming available. That makes me think the mortality rate would maybe rise a little, but not from 2% to 20%. If anything, I'd think that more than 1million would get it which would drive up the total death numbers, but I would think the mortality rate would still hover closer to the world's which is around 6% (and most likely rising).
     
    Rocket River likes this.
  2. TheresTheDagger

    Joined:
    May 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,099
    Likes Received:
    7,741
    Where are you getting the mortality rate of 10 to 24%?
     
  3. ipaman

    ipaman Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    13,022
    Likes Received:
    7,788
    The actual mortality rate is probably =<0.1% because there are thousands of asymptomatic folks who are not counted. The current high rates are attributed to the known positives only. All that said the stats or lack thereof are not political but that doesn't exclude any politician from using them or the virus in general. We've already seen that with the stimulus debacles.
     
    Pringles likes this.
  4. TheresTheDagger

    Joined:
    May 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,099
    Likes Received:
    7,741
    There are going to be WAY more Americans getting this disease than 1 million. We were at 100,000 5 days ago. Today, we passed 200,000 KNOWN cases.

    Think more along the lines of 50 million plus...hopefully less because of our social distancing...
     
  5. B@ffled

    B@ffled Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2019
    Messages:
    1,567
    Likes Received:
    787
    So are the two doctors on the WH response team stating worse case scenarios, because it's in their nature? I get that and you always want to prepare for the worst case or contingencies. That's why I think Trump doesn't try to control the message from them like he seemed to early on. I think he's counting on doing better than 10% so he can campaign on it. Really not a bad strategy.
     
  6. B@ffled

    B@ffled Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2019
    Messages:
    1,567
    Likes Received:
    787
    1million get it & 100K to 240K dead. I believe that's what was reported yesterday.

    I agree with your assessment. If we're at 200K now 1million isn't close. It's the mortality rate that I'm looking at. Of course, each day brings new data and more people are being tested, etc. All of these numbers are dynamic.
     
  7. WNBA

    WNBA Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2002
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    404
    They can claim the virus is different from the one in other countries. Call it Trump virus but it is way more deadly.
     
  8. No Worries

    No Worries Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    30,044
    Likes Received:
    16,921
    The actual mortality rate is 0.0%. All of the "deaths" are just really good crisis actors.
     
  9. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    53,958
    Likes Received:
    41,931
    Exactly. Estimates for Minnesota where I'm at alone says that possible 40-80% will get infected. That means 2 - 4 million in Minnesota alone. Consider that same number for CA, NY, TX, and then we're talking in the 10s to 100 millions.

    We often hear two numbers, the infection rate and the mortality rate of those who get the infection. There is a third number inbetween which is how many who get infected might be so sick they need hospitalization. If we take a figure of 60% of Americans will get infected that is around 200 million. If out of that 20% will become symptomatic enough to require hospitalization that's 40 million. How many of those end up dying is going to be effected by what are medical resources are. If we don't have enough hospital beds, ICU beds and ventilators that number could be high or low. There is another factor is how soon people get it and how soon people recover, the flattening the curve. If cases are spaced out we can keep on cycling people through treatment without overwhelming the medical system. US numbers are probably higher than other countries because we got a later start and because we don't have the same health resources per capita as other countries.
     
    conquistador#11 likes this.
  10. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    36,079
    Likes Received:
    22,549
    That's the most depressing thing I've read all day, well this and the Texans forum.
     
    Hakeemtheking likes this.
  11. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    53,958
    Likes Received:
    41,931
  12. Andre0087

    Andre0087 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    8,300
    Likes Received:
    11,261
    You make @Trader_Jorge look like a champion of civil rights, stop and go the **** away with your communist bullshit.
     
    B@ffled likes this.
  13. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    37,717
    Likes Received:
    18,917
    The mortality rate is likely 0.5% on the low end and around 1% on the high end.

    Germany has done the best overall testing of its population and they are still north of 1%.

    I think once you get to 50% of the country infected, you get people over the age of 55 to self-isolate and let the rest of the country get back to work.
     
  14. Amiga

    Amiga 10 years ago...
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    21,814
    Likes Received:
    18,605
    Death is overrated. ~20% requiring hospitalization is much scarier.
     
  15. adoo

    adoo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,577
    Likes Received:
    6,107
    that scenario is based on the assumption that Americans will adhere perfectly to social distancing and stay-at-home guidelines

    U do know that

    there are close to 10 states (Fla, Tx, etc) that haven’t issued stay-at-home edict,
    No?
     
  16. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,046
    It's frustrating to hear such a wild variety of estimates. Why can Houston only test 250 people a day? What in the hell?
     
  17. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    43,295
    Likes Received:
    25,313
    I posted an article in another thread detailing the inevitability of the situation and how our modeling estimates are obfuscating an important fact.
    https://bbs.clutchfans.net/index.ph...sophical-question.304422/page-3#post-12920990

    /non-expert opinion
    I've read tweets about asthmatic people being an at-risk factor. I imagine if you're a vaper who got the wrong groovy syrup, you're in the same boat too.

    I don't think it's a matter of having "flu seasons" but more like a one-or-two-off chicken pox with a higher mortality rate. That is...until we get a vaccine or a near instant and readily available test that reduces the oh-**** factor a hundred fold.
     
  18. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    47,647
    Likes Received:
    36,593
    This issue here isn't morality rate. It's hospitalization rate which is around 20%.

    If the expected rate of infected reach around 50 million, that is going to devastate our healthcare infrustrcture and pretty much have no ICU beds left. This will lead to doctors having to make difficult triage decisions on who to treat and who to let die in the hallways. People who have illnesses and injuries that have nothing to do with the virus will die because there won't be any beds left and doctors and nurses would be over run.
     
    B@ffled likes this.
  19. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    28,432
    Likes Received:
    43,598
    We will be lucky if a million doesn't die when all is said and done come 2022 or 23. Even if we seriously slow the transmission, it will just break out again the second we resume life... which has to be done eventually right? Another wave will surge. This thing isn't going away until either the vast majority of the population gets it, or the vast majority get the vaccine.... and you better hope the vaccine, which is over a year away and who knows how long it would take to distribute to the entire population, is the one that comes first.

    The current global death rate on recovered cases is 20%, active cases 5% are critical, estimated that 20-50% of the infected are not symptomatic, testing is abysmal nearly everywhere. I'm (purely) guessing the true death rate will be around 1-2% for highly developed countries, perhaps it could be under 1% if a country has a relatively healthy population, with a good healthcare system that isn't overrun.
     
  20. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    23,974
    Likes Received:
    19,861
    Either way we are now at the point to where herd immunity is our most likely end solution along with a potential vaccine by the fall/winter. 100k... 1 million... either way you’ll likely feel this close to you. Nobody is escaping this.

    I would anticipate that mass rapid testing is going to be the answer to opening back up the economy and workforce. Employers and local officials will have to put in place rules to test everyone, and if you test negative you can go to work. Those who don’t test out have to stay in isolation till they get a negative test.

    That’s really the only logical outcome I can see happening. Gentle asks to isolate... kinda... in America just isn’t working enough to be much of a solution other than helping hospitals a little bit.

    What a cluster F. Sure does make all the other crisis’ like terrorism, etc look like small potatoes.
     
    Hakeemtheking likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now