Mr trump Tells ABC News "It’s not an interference. They have information. I think I’d take it."

Its almost as if the husband of an incumbent Secretary of State was taking money from the russian government for speeches. It's CRAZY!

 

I am pretty sure he chose his words just to get this reaction. Give him some credit for knowing what will set the media off.

 

Why is that a positive trait for the manger of the world's largest bureaucracy and commander of the world's largest military?

Anyways your post seems like post hoc reasoning. You are just finding the most absurd reasoning to justify his statements. In reality he's trying to paint a narrative to his base that it's okay to accept help from a foreign adversary in a Presidental election.

Also, you didn't answer my questions I asked in my previous post.

 

So what are your thoughts of what Trump stated because you know....

He's the President.

Link to those speeches btw. Also, did those speeches occur during a Presidental campaign?

 

Being an objective observer its obvious he's trolling the **** outta the dems and liberals and they're eating it up

 

What makes you an objective observer? No such thing exists amongst humanity.

This is nothing more than post hoc rationalization.

 

I don't support anyone, I support policies that effect me regardless of party so as all the mud is being slung I sit back and laugh because all politicians are poisonous fruit of the same tree...hoc?

 

O so you're an enlightened centrist. Everyone is the same.

 

Trump commits crimes and advocates commiting crimes unthinkable 2 years ago.

Conservative posters reponse: let's talk about How evil Hillary and liberals are!

 

Also the other response: he's trolling the libtards.

It's pathetic at this point. A true cult.

 

Seriously, what's hoc?

 

https://www.skepticink.com/tippling...asoning-our-intuition-and-changing-our-minds/

Basically, someone has a set narrative in their head and any events that occurs, said Individual will work backwards to fit their narrative.

 

Like when conspiracy theorists search for YouTube videos to confirm their conspiracy. I get it. That's a perfect way to describe the current climate of political spectators, both sides make Twitter unbearable

 

Man you will swallow whatever j*zz Trump will serve you up

 

False equivalency

 

the information in the dossier is from the Kremlin.....

Steele's sources where Russian government officials.

 

So Steele is a Russian agent? Or during his career as a British spy he found contacts unfriendly to the Putin regime he can trust?

Honestly tying Steele to the Putin regime is insulting to one's intelligence. You really buy that narrative? I doubt it.

What you essentially are implying is that any CIA or MI6 paramilitary officer or spy who is a subject matter expert in Russian intelligence is essentially a Russian asset because they know Russian assets. Seems like circular reasoning to me.

 

Its not a debate. its a fact. The Steele Dossier comes from Russian government officials.

Here are some of Steele's sources according to Steele:

i bet the 'Kremlin demiurge' is really an anti-Putin America lover. jesus chowd.....

Do you think Putin's top advisers are really talking to Steele against Putins wishes? do you really think Putin didn't tell them to do it?

 

So Steele a career British Spy is a Russian asset?