2019 NBA Finals: Golden State Warriors vs. Toronto Raptors

A few people here are interested in the games, you are more interested in somethings outside the games, that is funny.

 

The game is over. Looking forward to the next game...

 

The game is tonight, are you still talking the Wednesday game which was already done?

 

Yes...when I said the game is already over, I was talking about the game that is already over. Not really sure what there is to talk about tonight's game...they need to play it.

 

Then please use it

 

Please provide evidence of this said established standard

 

I always do. Perhaps you need to consider your own written communications skills. Or your ability to apply logic.

 

http://www.plea.org/legal_resources/?a=127&searchTxt=&cat=8&pcat=4

"An assault can include any of the following acts...

intentionally applying force to a person, such as hitting, poking or shoving them

attempting to apply force to a person, whether or not actual contact is made

threatening with an act or gesture to apply force to another person, causing them to believe they are in danger

carrying a weapon, or what appears to be a weapon and blocking another person's way, accosting them or begging"

 

I am taking issue with the premise and logic of your arguments and not the facts of the case.

Please note the leading phrase " Following your logic to the extreme"

 

What you have provided is not a statute and far from an established standard

 

If you always do, then why ask me to prove an assertion I did not make?

 

Sorry, I know what you mean, but that guy biina is just funny.

 

I saw the "following your logic to the extreme" phrase, but then saw no reasonable extension of the logic I used. There is no reasonable equivalency between what Stevens did and what Drake does whatsoever. It's possible that I am unaware of something that Drake has done that could reasonably equated to what Stevens did that you are aware of...so I'm asking you to provide that information if you have it.

Bottom line...Stevens physically assaulted Lowry, Drake has never assaulted a player physically. So there is no reasonable equivalency you can can make to extend the logic I used to apply to Drake.

 

I believe this thread is going sideways because everyone knows the likely outcome. Raps in 5?! Only 1 person voted for that outcome.....

 

You asserted that "Following your logic to an extreme..." that Drake should be given a lifetime ban. That is not a reasonable assertion.

 

I voted Raptors in 6.

 

Is Klay definitely playing tonight? And if so, is it with any kind of minutes restrictions?

 

Shove ---> unwarranted contact
Minority owner ------> team ambassador

It's extensions not equivalents

 

It's is reasonable if your logic is followed to the extreme cos there is no set standard.

 

Yes, he is going to play, also without a minute restriction. I found this from realGM.com. I really want to get this kind of information here, I did not, that is why I expressed my bad feeling in my previous post.

Hope the GS is going to lose the today game again!