most effective stop crying LOL 11.2 pts most in the league more than avg efficiency doing everything else gravity & volume lebron 3 pts behind
NO.. why can't Lebron drive more? why can't he drive as much as harden? less skills? ablility? vision? stamina?
or maybe the right question is, why does Harden insist on driving that much when he's not as efficient as LeBron? why does Westbrook take that many shots when he's not that efficient?
when did I equate the two? you're using the same argument that WBs fans make, that's what I'm calling out. excusing relatively low efficiency due to high volume is a cop out, and you know it
harden needs to continue driving & scoring 11.2 pts & producing another 6 pts thru asists and open up the defense wb needs to shoot less ask MDA & Cp3 like Lebron would be "I wanna join Houston only if Harden drives less" LOL
Also, by your logic here, why do you not consider Harden the best 3PT shooter? He was leading the league in sheer makes before the injury. So Harden is the best 3PT shooter in your view, right?
harden's drives are more effective considering the success of the team harden's elite playmaking, 3's, & drives is the engine for the rockets success this year get over it
I choose Harden this year he produces 17 pts (by himself & assists) off drives compared to Lebron's 11 pts produced off drives that's 6 more points almost equal our pt differential that's why we're 2nd seed overall while cavs is 5th seed overall
do you have trouble reading? finishing ability at the rim = ability to put the ball into the basket on his own. It has nothing to do with playmaking nor team success. Harden can literally be the worst finisher at the rim, and do other things so great that the team keeps winning. Also, you still didn't respond to the 3PT analogy
yeah he can produce 11 pts off drives.. best in the league if lebron can put the ball into the basket off drives better then he could have easily score more than harden obviously he can't I think his drive volume is fine and you think he should drive less we can agree to disagree
fine, but in most cases being 10% more efficient while producing just 3 points less would be considered to be better. There's no absolute answer to it, but when we're talking about 10% gap in efficiency, that's huge