When a guard is getting 15 rebounds, he's got enough extra positions to cover a bad shooting night. Bottom line, he got the win in game 7. LeChoke has yet to win a finals game.
Geeez not this sh*& again. LeBron took a team to the Finals by himself Kobe took the Lakers to the Lottery by himself Kobe b****ed and moaned and got Gasol Then Kobe got his rings What the Heat do in the Finals is yet to be determined
LeBron b****ed out and joined forces with Wade and Bosh... what's your point? At the end of the day, Kobe has 5 rings and James has 0. Deal with it.
The point is you hypocritical Kobe nuttsuckers keep criticizing LeBron for attempting to do what Kobe has already done - win a ring with great players around him. If LeBron played with Shaq in his prime, he would have multiple rings If LeBron played with Gasol in his prime, he would have mutiple rings I mean really, its you guys that have a hard time dealing with that
Face the facts. You're tossing around hypothetical situations, and playing the "what-if" game. Kobe has 5 rings, and LeBron has 0. Get that through your head.
Exactly. And since Robert Horry has 7 rings, he is obviously better than both. It's somewhere around Robert Horry>> Kobe>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lebron. Right?
lol since when did kobe go team up with shaq, he became a superstar that complimented shaqs game. and if anything he ran shaq out of LA... lebron jetted on the team that drafted him to go team up with another superstar wing who was already set to have a pretty good 1-2 punch with a dominant big in bosh..
No dude, get it through your head. The season Kobe was by himself is not a hypothetical -- its a fact. When he was "by himself" they went to the lottery, he cried and tried his best to get out of LA. Not a hypothetical -- its fact, far from what LeBron did his seven years in Cleveland. You Kobe fanboys just hate that And as far as rings.... Jordan has six, Horry has seven, and Russell has eleven WTF is your point???
In 2007, Cavs won 50 games, would be No.6 seed if they're in west going against No.3 seed Spurs in first round. Finals my ass, LeBron was lucky not to be swept in first round for being in a weak conference. His record against 50 wins team were 5L and 1W. Lakers had to get through three 50 wins team just to be in the finals.
the rings arent why kobe is better than lebron, if i had to choose between either player in their primes i'de go with kobe all day..
After those two 60+ win seasons the Cavs had and lost in the playoffs, Bron fanboys argue "HE DIDNT HAVE ANY TEAMMATES!!!"...well, he didnt win those 60+ games by himself did he? F***outtahere. Kobe>>>LeBron. I don't care how many scoring titles or MVP's Lebron wins. He'll never win a championship.
I'm missing the part where that's a fact. For future reference, this a fact -- something that can be shown to be true, to exist, or to have happened. For example, Kobe Bryant is a 5X NBA Champion. You mad?
Riiiiiiiigght A 5x champion that needed Shaq for his first three and Gasol for his last two (which, by your definintion is definitely a fact -- not a hypothetical) Don't be mad son, just stating the facts..heh heh
haha another lebron fan boy excuse, what happend when lebrick had shaq? so if lebrick wins this year, following ur logic, he needed wade and bosh? can't do it alone?
Kobe joined Lakers earlier than Shaq did, way earlier than Gasol did. People beg to join him, not the other way around like LeChoke.
