okay. you could do what NewRoxFan advised someone else today to do and just put folks you don't like on "ignore." it's this cool new feature on the forum that works like a charm. sorry, probably exceeded my word count there, but it was an important point to get across.
The problem with that is that trolls like you and Bobby post incessantly which limits the effectiveness of the ignore feature. Let me know if I spelled all of that correctly.
say . . . how did YOU feel about the mean girls last night all dressed up in white? I don't recall ever seeing you express an opinion on that. I'd be curious what you thought about that.
yeah . . . I'm pretty sure I don't post "incessantly." it may appear that way, but I suspect that's only your perception because right now I seem to be someone of interest to you
You ask me questions and I answer them so feel free to debate and discuss or just post some more editorials or cite "mean girls" again.
Trump's SOTU . . . how many lies were there? Fact-checking the fact checkers: http://thefederalist.com/2019/02/06/state-american-fact-checking-completely-useless/
You are of zero interest to me, it's more your incessant trolling. You could leave tomorrow and I'd have zero interest in discussing anything about you.
you could stay here today or tomorrow and I'd pretty much have the same zero interest in your contributions--which I don't see as all that noteworthy to be honest with you. just sayin'
Who cares? I sure don't. Maybe I could dredge up some goofy blog editorials and I could reach your spamtastic level.
redirecting toward the thread topic "Hyper-precision fact-checking to create the impression that a Republican is misleading the public: For this, take Politico’s use of hyper-specificity to insinuate that Donald Trump was lying to the public about abuse of women at the border. During the State of the Union, Trump said 'one in three women is sexually assaulted on the long journey north.' This contention is only 'partly true,' according to Politico, because a '2017 report by Doctors Without Borders' found that only 31 percent of female migrants and 17 percent of male migrants said they had been actually abused while traveling through Mexico. "Whether the scary statistic by Doctors Without Borders is accurate or not, is one thing. Trump, however, merely had the temerity to contend that 'one in every three' illegal immigrants has been abused rather than stating that '33.333 percent of women' have been abused attempting to cross the border––probably a rounding error in the poll. It is almost surely the case that every past president and every politician has used 'one-third' or 'one-half' rather than offer the specific fraction, and walked away without being fact-checked."
