Sending positive vibes to Ryan Anderson thread

if i recall well there are numerous threads giving love to harden and there s such a thread giving support to corey...if i recall well i personally made a thread or 2 in support of corey

 

1) when I said 14 pts per or 4 made 3s per I meant avarage per game
2) I asked 3 of those 5 criteria so I expected him to not make upto 2 of those criteria

you know he did avg 13.6 pts and 2.8 made 3s last year

ok 4 threes is too much to ask for

so it too much ask to ask him to average close to 14 pts/gm OR 3 made 3's/game?

Go Rockets!

 

Is it too much to ask of you to just say 'lets go rhynoo!'

 

No PF in the history of the game has ever done 3 per game. Let's just set it to the record for a PF, which is 2.8, which is what Ryan did last year as record-holder.

So, instead of choosing a number simply because it is a round number (like the trip dub fallacy), Morey's criteria would definitely factor in the position he is buying. So, I think Morey would agree on the NBA best criteria.

OK?

Or are you a just a round number truther, like all the MVP voters last year. Then let's settle on 3 per 100 possessions.

 

Seriously?

Hey BTW, I think someone should start a positive vibe thread for PJ Tucker. His shot has gone to the dumpster lately.

 

Man, I still like your Dekker one better.

 

I get that a lot, may have to bring that one back out of retirement

 

you know the meaning of "close"?

as in "average close to"

that means somewhere near right? 2.7 3s per game OR 13 pts per game IS close..

 

Yeah I didn't wanna say it, but PJ better play LOCKDOWN defense every night because his offense is virtually nonexistent.

 

Damn white demons and their positivity threads!!!

 

GOT DAMN @DreamShook send some positive vibes this way boy!

 

Thread working!

 

unless you wanna give this positive vibes thing a try.

 

Is that positive enough?

 

The thread title is "Sending positive vibes to Ryan Anderson". The thread title is not "Every post here must send positive vibes to Ryan Anderson". Take a look at the "Everybody post must start with 'take that for data'" thread for reference.

How is "Sending positive vibes tioRyan Anderson" different from "Ryan Anderson is killing us"? Both of these denote an action that is happening. If the OP is posting about sending positive vibes to Ryan Anderson then I am allowed to express my opinion on him sending positive vibes to Ryan Anderson. It is really that simple. The OP doesnt even state that it should only contain posts about sending Anderson positive vibes. His first post just says he is sending Anderson positive vibes. Posting my OPINION on him sending positive vibes to Ryan Anderson is definitely on topic.

The reality is you are just a bunch of ostriches burying your head in the sand, you can't even take differing opinions on your lord and savior Ryan Anderson. I'm not the one being clouded here, you are.