PDA

View Full Version : High school spends $6.6 million on football stadium renovations!


drapg
09-06-2002, 12:48 PM
Westlake's dream house
Renovated stadium gives Chaps pricey home-field advantage


By Rick Cantu
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Friday, September 6, 2002

Imagine a carpet so ragged that the dye sticks to your shoes. A home too small for expected guests. A toilet that backs up every Friday night. No television.

That was the old Chaparral Stadium.

This is the new one: the latest in artificial turf, about 4,000 extra seats, new lighting, a giant scoreboard and message center, and additional restrooms on both sides of the stadium.

It will be home for Westlake High School, one of the most accomplished programs in football-crazy Texas.

"I'm blown away," said senior tight end Joey Thomas. "It looks like a college stadium."

But it didn't come cheap.

The project cost about $6.6 million, approximately $2.2 million more than initially estimated. Some taxpayers in the Eanes Independent School District say they can ill afford to spend that much on football when the district has other pressing needs.

"It's just a shame that we are putting money into luxury athletic facilities at the same time teachers' working conditions don't support the learning environment we want for our children," said former Eanes Trustee Donna Howard.

The stadium's improvements — the first major renovation since the facility was built in 1969 — were made possible by a $67 million bond issue that was approved by voters in February 2001.

Major changes at Chaparral Stadium include:

• A playing surface called Astro Turf 12, a spongy green turf that is softer, thus easier on the knees, than the old artificial surface.

• A scoreboard and message center that will show player and team statistics and advertisements. Someday it might be used for instant replay.

• Seats added to both sides of the stadium. Seating capacity has been expanded from 6,000 to 10,352. There are 1,350 red seats with back support and cup holders on the home side.

• New lights that will be retained at the stadium, meaning they won't bleed into nearby neigborhoods. The old lights will be installed at the Westlake baseball field.

• New speakers on top the message center, and microphone sets for referees to let the lead official announce penalties to the fans.

• More restrooms. Instead of having one set of restrooms on each side, there will be three. Portable restrooms no longer will be needed on the visitors' side.

• An 18-acre parking lot that will help alleviate space problems near the visitors' side.

• A new pressbox with an elevator.

Brad Shields, an Eanes school board memberand 10-year public address announcer at Westlake games, said the improvements were overdue.

"We have been sensitive to spending money for athletic facilities," Shields said. "The stadium was in terrible condition, and I'm not saying it's the Taj Mahal today."

Cost overruns


How much is too much?

Did the football stadium really need a 10-by-15-foot scoreboard and message center and new lights?

Howard said the stadium needed to be renovated, but the district went too far.

The original budget for the stadium complex was about $4.4 million, said Eanes district business manager Bob Jocius.

Jocius said the increase stems from items not in the original budget, such as extra seating, the message center, new lights and poles, pressbox expansion, new seats and restrooms. There will be 47 toilets at the stadium, 30 more than in previous seasons.

Eanes Superintendent Jess Butler said the extra costs will not affect future school projects. The district is using interest from unspent bonds, and plans were made for inflation and contingency costs, he said.

The district has one high school, two middle schools and six elementary schools.

"We have schools that don't have playgrounds," said Kim Oswald, a mother of two children at Westlake. "The priority was putting the football field together."

School officials said delays in building playgrounds have nothing to do with the cost of the stadium, but were caused by delays in getting building permits.

Proponents of the improvements concede that an oversized scoreboard and the JumboTron-like message center — officially called a Daktronics Integrated Scoring, Video-Sound, Message Center — is extravagant, but will pay for itself.

The message center cost $400,000, and it has two panels that will be used for advertising. The goal is to generate $100,000 from ads on the panels and the scoreboard each season. District officials said no ads have been sold yet.

Shields said the idea of getting the message board started when the Waco Independent School District received one valued at $350,000 as a gift from Coca Cola two years ago.

The Daktronics message board in Waco is part of a $13 million stadium built in the city two years ago. Waco Athletic Director Jack Moss said the University of Nebraska football team accidentally drove to the stadium last fall and figured it was at Baylor University's home field, Floyd Casey Stadium.

Waco's experience


The stadium in Waco has become a regular site for high school playoff games the past two years. Advertising on the message board and nearby marquee is worth $94,000 annually. The rotating panels — there are nine in all — bring in about $67,500 a year. An additional $26,500 comes from two permanent signs at the front of the stadium.

"I'm a little biased, but I think we have the best high school football stadium in the state," Moss said.

Other cities with new scoreboards and message boards include Mesquite, Galena Park and Laredo. The Birdville district has one that is used by Haltom City and Richland Hills. Moss said the Waco stadium was used by various organizations 226 days last year.

Shields hopes Westlake duplicates Waco's success.

Judging by early ticket sales, Westlake is off to a good start. Some 3,430 people have purchased season tickets, about 1,000 more than previous years. Fans must pay between $15 and $50 for seat options to maintain their tickets.

The expanded stadium will help allure big-name teams to Westlake, football coach Ron Schroeder said. He said teams such as perennial powerhouse Converse Judson have declined offers to play at old Chaparral Stadium because there were not enough seats for their fans.

"Whenever we play a San Antonio school it's always been in San Antonio," Schroeder said. "For 15 years I've been driving to San Antonio."

Schroeder led the Chaps to the state championship in 1996. The team is ranked No. 1 in the state despite not having played its first game.

Schroeder said he has been too busy preparing his team for tonight's game to be too concerned with the stadium improvements. He has good reason: Westwood, tonight's foe, upset Westlake last season.

The coach's favorite part of the stadium, though, is the new turf. He had to wash his shoes and socks daily when the old turf was down because the green dye rubbed off too easily.

"The old stadium was an embarrassment," Schroeder said. "Anyone who is fair realizes how poor our old stadium was."




Well, it is Westlake... but still, couldn't $6.6 million be spent in a manner that is more beneficial to the education of the entire student body?

MadMax
09-06-2002, 02:12 PM
wow...this is real mismanagement of money, in my opinion. I don't have all the facts yet...not sure if this facility could be used for other things...not sure if it was all district money that paid for this or whether the private sector chipped in...but just off the cuff, i'd say this is a mistake.

BrianKagy
09-06-2002, 03:10 PM
They're trying to replace Baylor in the Big 12.

MadMax
09-06-2002, 03:17 PM
Originally posted by BrianKagy
They're trying to replace Baylor in the Big 12.

i think they already did!

Smokey
09-06-2002, 04:13 PM
Waco High (the school with the $13 million stadium) could whip the Bears.

btw, good luck vs. Samford

Kam
09-06-2002, 04:19 PM
Man, that is one Fine stadium.

MadMax
09-06-2002, 04:43 PM
Originally posted by Smokey
Waco High (the school with the $13 million stadium) could whip the Bears.

btw, good luck vs. Samford

i think we'll beat Samford

*gulp*

DVauthrin
09-06-2002, 04:57 PM
I am still baffled why Kevin Steele took the Baylor job. No offense to Baylor alumni but the best thing for your program is to leave the big 12 and either go independent or get picked up by CUSA or the WAC(where you have a much better chance of rebuilding)

Puedlfor
09-06-2002, 05:09 PM
What a collossal waste of money.

But what do you expect from the district that wouldn't build a second high school because it might split up the football team . . . .

MadMax
09-06-2002, 05:10 PM
Originally posted by DVauthrin
I am still baffled why Kevin Steele took the Baylor job. No offense to Baylor alumni but the best thing for your program is to leave the big 12 and either go independent or get picked up by CUSA or the WAC(where you have a much better chance of rebuilding)

disagree...the best thing is to stay in the Big 12 and get Big 12 dollars...not every school in every major conference is competitive in football...every conference needs a vanderbilt. they do compete quite well in other sports including baseball and basketball.

Smokey
09-06-2002, 05:29 PM
Originally posted by MadMax
disagree...the best thing is to stay in the Big 12 and get Big 12 dollars...not every school in every major conference is competitive in football...every conference needs a vanderbilt. they do compete quite well in other sports including baseball and basketball.

While I agree every conference has a weakest link, Baylor is one of the worst football teams in Division I. Case in point, Baylor got pummeled by California 70-22 last weekend. California finished 1-10 last season.

If it wasn't for Ann Richards, Baylor would be playing Division I-AA teams like Samford every week. As long as Baylor football remains in the Big 12, they will be the doormat of the conference. It must demoralize the team get run over every week.

Texas fans shouldn't complain though for the extra scrimmage. We get a home game vs. Baylor every year :D

MadMax
09-06-2002, 05:41 PM
Originally posted by Smokey
While I agree every conference has a weakest link, Baylor is one of the worst football teams in Division I. Case in point, Baylor got pummeled by California 70-22 last weekend. California finished 1-10 last season.

If it wasn't for Ann Richards, Baylor would be playing Division I-AA teams like Samford every week. As long as Baylor football remains in the Big 12, they will be the doormat of the conference. It must demoralize the team get run over every week.

Texas fans shouldn't complain though for the extra scrimmage. We get a home game vs. Baylor every year :D

wait a second..playing division I-AA schools?? come on!! you know better than that...our school is too big and our facilities too nice for that to happen. at the very least we'd be in the WAC.

And keep in mind, we did win the conference in baseball this year. It's not football, I'll grant you, but it's not like we're not competing. And we've been consistently improving in basketball.

also..the california score is greatly misleading...let's see how they look after 5 games..particularly the game against Kansas.

Puedlfor
09-06-2002, 05:46 PM
And keep in mind, we did win the conference in baseball this year. It's not football, I'll grant you, but it's not like we're not competing. And we've been consistently improving in basketball.

Texas won both the Regular Season, and Big XII tournament in Baseball this year.

But Baylor's baseball team is competitive, and the basketball team is getting better.

DVauthrin
09-06-2002, 05:48 PM
When i said football program, I meant exactly that. There are plenty of schools that are in conferences for certain sports. You have other programs that are good, no doubt, but football would be better served elsewhere if you ever want to win again.

MadMax
09-06-2002, 05:49 PM
Originally posted by Puedlfor
Texas won both the Regular Season, and Big XII tournament in Baseball this year.


damn, you're right!!! i guess we were leading the conference for a while or something...but you're right, we were in the top 10 in the country for a lot of the season.

Smokey
09-06-2002, 05:51 PM
Originally posted by MadMax
And keep in mind, we did win the conference in baseball this year. It's not football, I'll grant you, but it's not like we're not competing. And we've been consistently improving in basketball.

also..the california score is greatly misleading...let's see how they look after 5 games..particularly the game against Kansas.

According to these standings:

http://www2.big12sports.com/new/baseball/standings/

Texas won the Big 12 regular season title in baseball.

The Kansas game will be big for Baylor. KU was the last conference team Baylor has a W against.

edit - I was typing this post while others responded.