[Amazing Photoshop Stuff] "Un"-blurring images

[DarkHorse]

This is a sneak preview, so no word on when this will actually appear in a released product. But this is pretty cool stuff. Strait out of CSI. I honestly didn't think this sort of thing was possible.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xxjiQoTp864" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Maximus]

Whoa! Steve Jobs lives!!!1 :eek:

[Deckard]

Had I been there, I would have applauded as well. That was fantastic. I'll be looking for it to come on the market, and I hope the wait isn't terribly long!

[Thefabman]

wow...can't wait for this.

[B]

It was fun to watch the demo in person. Adobe MAX sneaks are usually pretty entertaining. Last year they showed off the content aware fill, which allows you to remove objects or people from photos easily.

[Rokkit]

ENHANCE

[Invisible Fan]

next thing you know they'll be chopping scans of reflections off mirrors.

darnit rokkit

[SwoLy-D]

Meh. I'll praise it when I see it. Right now it's just fluff. I'm not sure this can be done. I'll believe it when I can do it myself. :o

[conquistador#11]

Angela montenegro has more impressive software. :)

[The Hunted]

Meh. I'll praise it when I see it. Right now it's just fluff.

That'd what she said.

[The Hunted]

^^That's :mad::);):o

[vinsensual]

Looks like someone at Adobe was not satisfied with the quality of the leaked Scarlet Johansson pics.

[DaDakota]

Fantastic.

DD

[SwoLy-D]

Don't they mean "SHARPEN" instead of "un-blur"? :grin:That'd what she said.I was a prey, indeed. :o Good one, sir.

[RoxSqaud]

Photoshopped.

[CrazyDave]

now if they could unblur each frame of that video we could see if it was really impressive or not. I'm with Swoly, I will believe in it when I see it, but it isn't that far fetched to imagine them attempting to decipher the movement of a camera during a shot by examining a photo and then using that to restore pixels where they should have been had the camera been still (hard to imagine the details would really be there, but maybe, eh?) . I would suspect it works better on images where the camera was moved, rather than just out of focus. Pretty impressive, but again, believe it when I see it in practice with consistency.

[SwoLy-D]

I still say it's mumbo-jumbo. I'd like to see it work on some of the pictures my grandma takes with her fun-saver®. :o

http://bogomip.net/images/bigfoot_walking.jpg

or

EDIT:
Graphic .gif of shot on JFK (now I realize that was unnecessary :( )http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/move.gif
are calling.

[CrazyDave]

dude, I didn't need to see that Kennedy clip again blurry (on a loop no less), I sure don't need to see it clarified.

couldn't find a pic of nessie?

[RoxSqaud]

http://bogomip.net/images/bigfoot_walking.jpg


That's obviously bigfoot.:confused:

[vinsensual]

<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KiqkclCJsZs?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KiqkclCJsZs?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

[BetterThanI]

Don't they mean "SHARPEN" instead of "un-blur"?

That's what I thought as well. It's basically a sharpen function that includes an algorithm to estimate the direction from which the image was blurred and then sharpens to compensate. Really clever. Could see this being VERY useful for the every-day user.

[Maximus]

the future:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkcU0gwZUdg

[Prince]

wow, dis is d nik big ting...