View Full Version : USA vs England at Wembley stadium today at 2pm.
DaDakota
05-28-2008, 07:22 AM
A friendly between the country that invented the English language, and the country whose President is screwing it up.
:D
A game at Wembley stadium, big friendly, let's see how the USA plays against an international power like England.
USA...USA...USA......on ESPN Classic at 2pm.
England 2-1.
DD
Christopher
05-28-2008, 07:47 AM
Englands an international power?
Their Leagues are full of overseas players and they havent won a thing at international level for so long!
DaDakota
05-28-2008, 08:04 AM
Englands an international power?
Their Leagues are full of overseas players and they havent won a thing at international level for so long!
Compared to the USA they are.....and I would say they are one of the top 10 in the world.
DD
Christopher
05-28-2008, 08:09 AM
Nah, you'll find thats all hype. They are not a very good side at all.
A big name, but not a good team. They missed qualification for Euro 2008.
As an Aussie, I found it quite good for a laugh. :D
By the way, last time we played England, we smacked them. Hopefully you lot do the same. :D
leroy
05-28-2008, 09:13 AM
Compared to the USA they are.....and I would say they are one of the top 10 in the world.
DD
They have some of the top talent in the world, but they're not even top 10 in Europe right now.
That said, it's a great test for the young US team. Play a good team on the road in the home of football. I just want to see a good effort. I'm not concerned about a win, though it would be nice. They've got Spain this weekend and Argentina a week later. This is the toughest stretch of friendlies the USMNT has ever had. What a great way to get prepared for WC qualifying.
SwoLy-D
05-28-2008, 09:21 AM
I think the REAL ENGLISH people will win. If the ILLEGALs win, it will be nice to see, but I doubt it. :p
English 3
Illegals 2
I just want to see a good effort. I'm not concerned about a win, though it would be nice. UH-OH. That's loser talk, man. Do you really want a win, or no? :confused:
DaDarkone, the real European test will be against the country that invented the Spanish language in June...
leroy
05-28-2008, 09:38 AM
I think the REAL ENGLISH people will win. If the ILLEGALs win, it will be nice to see, but I doubt it. :p
English 3
Illegals 2
UH-OH. That's loser talk, man. Do you really want a win, or no? :confused:
DaDarkone, the real European test will be against the country that invented the Spanish language in June...
It's a friendly in England. Of course I want a win, but as long as they have a good showing and don't get embarrassed, I'll be happy. This game has no meaning other than giving extremely valuable experience to some younger players.
are they going to be showing any replays?
i have to go to the doctor today at 3pm.
SwoLy-D
05-28-2008, 09:48 AM
It's a friendly in England. Of course I want a win, but as long as they have a good showing and don't get embarrassed, I'll be happy. This game has no meaning other than giving extremely valuable experience to some younger players.No meaning...? No meaning? Wow. More loser talk. I get pissed if my team loses against BELIZE or against GERMANY... I want a win no matter whom we play... I can't believe you're still doing more loser talk. :D
This game should have been scheduled for JULY 4, 2008. :p
Kam, live on ESPN CLASSIC, replay is on GALAVISION at 7 p.m..
No meaning...? No meaning? Wow. More loser talk. I get pissed if my team loses against BELIZE or against GERMANY... I want a win no matter whom we play... I can't believe you're still doing more loser talk. :D
This game should have been scheduled for JULY 4, 2008. :p
Kam, live on ESPN CLASSIC, replay is on GALAVISION at 7 p.m..
Galavision? Like in espanol?
Ok, if i have to.
ferrari77
05-28-2008, 10:40 AM
Nah, you'll find thats all hype. They are not a very good side at all.
A big name, but not a good team. They missed qualification for Euro 2008.
As an Aussie, I found it quite good for a laugh. :D
By the way, last time we played England, we smacked them. Hopefully you lot do the same. :D
They are a good team but an underachieving one.
Most of the Three lions supporters like myself are currently in the doldrums and just waiting to see what "The Cabbage man" can do with our lads. All the knockout round Penalty losses since 96 mounted up and the final straw was 2006. We tried to give Macca a chance when he took over but it was just a mess, as was evidenced when Israel gave us a chance to get into the Euro's and we proceeded to lose in a terrible and shameful fashion to Croatia at Wembley.
I can't believe you're taking delight in winning a friendly match 3-1( what a smacking), a match in which our manager chose to substitute basically his entire Starting 11. Plus we all know how much stock Sven put in friendlies.
Anyway, I know the US has a solid squad, only issues are uptop with the retirement of McHead, but I think it'll be a 2-2 draw. A lot of my fellow brits still underestimate the US team and that's a shame.
Carlos Nice
05-28-2008, 10:42 AM
England 2-0
stobbartjohn
05-28-2008, 11:51 AM
C'mon the mighty England!
SwoLy-D
05-28-2008, 01:49 PM
Those guys with the trick pool shots are damn good :eek:
Game will be starting soon, ya'll. :o
saviorlh
05-28-2008, 01:56 PM
I'll go with:
England 3
USA 1
plcmts17
05-28-2008, 02:08 PM
No meaning...? No meaning? Wow. More loser talk. I get pissed if my team loses against BELIZE or against GERMANY... I want a win no matter whom we play... I can't believe you're still doing more loser talk. :D
You must go into mourning then when the U.S. beats the tri's :p :D :cool: ;) :) :o :rolleyes: :D :p
g1184
05-28-2008, 02:19 PM
english names are so funny ... wembley ... wimbledon ... paddington ... wombles ... all so full of whimsy. hmm ... yes, quite.
Nice Rollin
05-28-2008, 02:22 PM
Waste of time and resources.
ferrari77
05-28-2008, 02:33 PM
Waste of time and resources.
What is? Watching this match?
If it is then don't bother watching and no need to add your 2 cents to this thread. By not commenting we'll know you don't care, and that's not a problem,
It's freedom of choice.
g1184
05-28-2008, 02:40 PM
oohh, rooney wasted that chance. tough break.
leroy
05-28-2008, 02:53 PM
damn. Another pretty free kick by Beckham right on to the head of Terry. Howard never had a chance.
leroy
05-28-2008, 02:53 PM
How is it that England is the fresher looking team?
g1184
05-28-2008, 02:59 PM
How is it that England is the fresher looking team?
I'll blame jetlag, regardless of when they arrived.
DaDakota
05-28-2008, 03:05 PM
The USA needs an attacking creative midfielder badly today. Missing Donavan is a HUGE blow to our chances, he creates for himself and others....we don't have anyone like him on the pitch.
Too much panic and popping the ball up.
DD
leroy
05-28-2008, 03:28 PM
Eddie Johnson is horrible and should never play for the NT again.
DaDakota
05-28-2008, 04:04 PM
Adu should have been in earlier, he is so creative with the ball...we need more like him....what about that young striker that played for the Under 21s....Altidore...where was he?
DD
stobbartjohn
05-28-2008, 04:08 PM
First time I've seen your team in a while, but you look really poor. England are usually totally dire in friendlies and we weren't particularly good tonight, but we were made to look half decent by your lot.
The style of football USA plays just seems so negative. Maybe that's because today they were away from home and up against it against a superior team but still, even once behind they didn't really commit anyone forward and were totally devoid of creativity.
I watched the USA Under 23s in the Toulon tournament the other day too and their tactics were similarly negative. Is it a nationwide strategy of yours to play boring football? Very disappointed with USA tonight
Pizza_Da_Hut
05-28-2008, 04:12 PM
Team USA needs some time to introduce new talent, plus it should be noted this was a friendly, there was no Ching, and really Donovan was a no-show.
Still, there is room for improvement.
leroy
05-28-2008, 04:18 PM
First time I've seen your team in a while, but you look really poor. England are usually totally dire in friendlies and we weren't particularly good tonight, but we were made to look half decent by your lot.
The style of football USA plays just seems so negative. Maybe that's because today they were away from home and up against it against a superior team but still, even once behind they didn't really commit anyone forward and were totally devoid of creativity.
I watched the USA Under 23s in the Toulon tournament the other day too and their tactics were similarly negative. Is it a nationwide strategy of yours to play boring football? Very disappointed with USA tonight
Today can easily be blamed on a few factors. Missing the main playmaker (Donovan). Playing 2 forwards that have no business being on the national team, let alone the field (Wolff & Johnson). Playing with a fairly young team in what is probably an intimidating environment. Like DaDa said, Adu should have been in much earlier. I'm not sure what they have against bringing Altidore up. The 2 of them combine on such beautiful soccer that there is no excuse to not have both of them on the field.
They are better than this with a full squad. I didn't get to see the U-23's , but it was my understanding that they experimented a lot with the lineups and that caused some problems. I'm not sure they had Adu either, who controls that team.
As a country, we're still devoid of true attacking and creative midfielders. Much of the last decade plus was watching the horridly boring play of Claudio Reyna and Tab Ramos. Mids were taught to create through defense and passing. That's starting to change with Donovan, Dempsey, and Adu showing that center mids should actually lead the attack.
England was clearly the better squad today. Where is that play when it matters? :p
stobbartjohn
05-28-2008, 04:23 PM
Today can easily be blamed on a few factors. Missing the main playmaker (Donovan). Playing 2 forwards that have no business being on the national team, let alone the field (Wolff & Johnson). Playing with a fairly young team in what is probably an intimidating environment. Like DaDa said, Adu should have been in much earlier. I'm not sure what they have against bringing Altidore up. The 2 of them combine on such beautiful soccer that there is no excuse to not have both of them on the field.
They are better than this with a full squad. I didn't get to see the U-23's , but it was my understanding that they experimented a lot with the lineups and that caused some problems. I'm not sure they had Adu either, who controls that team.
As a country, we're still devoid of true attacking and creative midfielders. Much of the last decade plus was watching the horridly boring play of Claudio Reyna and Tab Ramos. Mids were taught to create through defense and passing. That's starting to change with Donovan, Dempsey, and Adu showing that center mids should actually lead the attack.
England was clearly the better squad today. Where is that play when it matters? :p
Man, I wish someone would find the answer to that last question. It's one that baffles the entire country lol. To be perfectly honest though, and don't take this the wrong way, but I think we face tougher teams in our qualifying campaigns than the USA team we faced tonight. By your own admission, your team was below strength which explains a lot. Also, there is a lot of question marks surrounding the motivation of our players when it comes to the national team now. Most of our players consider their clubs more important imo.
One of the commentators described it perfectly today when he said the US team had basically come to act as "spoilers" which is what we're used to a home to be fair.
I've not watched the US that much, most of what I have has been forgettable. The only match that really sticks in the mind is when they clung on to a draw against Italy at the World Cup when down to 10 men if I remember correctly. That was cool
leroy
05-28-2008, 04:33 PM
Man, I wish someone would find the answer to that last question. It's one that baffles the entire country lol. To be perfectly honest though, and don't take this the wrong way, but I think we face tougher teams in our qualifying campaigns than the USA team we faced tonight. By your own admission, your team was below strength which explains a lot. Also, there is a lot of question marks surrounding the motivation of our players when it comes to the national team now. Most of our players consider their clubs more important imo.
One of the commentators described it perfectly today when he said the US team had basically come to act as "spoilers" which is what we're used to a home to be fair.
I've not watched the US that much, most of what I have has been forgettable. The only match that really sticks in the mind is when they clung on to a draw against Italy at the World Cup when down to 10 men if I remember correctly. That was cool
They were down to 9 actually. It was 10 v 9 in the end in what was possibly the worst refereed game in professional sports history.
The US is typically labled as spoilers outside of our region. There is so little respect for us (not that today helped garner any more). The talent pool is growing. It's just time to get rid of some of the dead weight (Johnson, Wolff, Hejduk, Eddie Lewis) and to move on beyond some of the projects (Bradley). I'd love to finally see a squad that included Donovan, Dempsey, Adu, Benny Feilhaber, and Jozy Altidore.
Carlos Nice
05-28-2008, 04:39 PM
England 2-0
good call Mr. Nice
ferrari77
05-28-2008, 04:50 PM
First time I've seen your team in a while, but you look really poor. England are usually totally dire in friendlies and we weren't particularly good tonight, but we were made to look half decent by your lot.
The style of football USA plays just seems so negative. Maybe that's because today they were away from home and up against it against a superior team but still, even once behind they didn't really commit anyone forward and were totally devoid of creativity.
I watched the USA Under 23s in the Toulon tournament the other day too and their tactics were similarly negative. Is it a nationwide strategy of yours to play boring football? Very disappointed with USA tonight
I would have advised you not to watch the US team in the Toulon. That was basically players the coach was trying to have a look at to see if they merited inclusion in his Olympics team. The Coach himself is not exactly the most positive(in terms of play).
The style of football i've seen from the USA in the years since I moved to America has been positive for the most part.
ferrari77
05-28-2008, 04:56 PM
Today can easily be blamed on a few factors. Missing the main playmaker (Donovan). Playing 2 forwards that have no business being on the national team, let alone the field (Wolff & Johnson). Playing with a fairly young team in what is probably an intimidating environment. Like DaDa said, Adu should have been in much earlier. I'm not sure what they have against bringing Altidore up. The 2 of them combine on such beautiful soccer that there is no excuse to not have both of them on the field.
They are better than this with a full squad. I didn't get to see the U-23's , but it was my understanding that they experimented a lot with the lineups and that caused some problems. I'm not sure they had Adu either, who controls that team.
As a country, we're still devoid of true attacking and creative midfielders. Much of the last decade plus was watching the horridly boring play of Claudio Reyna and Tab Ramos. Mids were taught to create through defense and passing. That's starting to change with Donovan, Dempsey, and Adu showing that center mids should actually lead the attack.
England was clearly the better squad today. Where is that play when it matters? :p
Who out there would you recommend to take the place of EJ and Josh Wolff?
Jozy? Who else? As I mentioned earlier, with the Intn'l retirement of McBride, the USA has a weak pool of strikers right now.
Altidore has played a ton of matches in the past year, both with his club and country. He's a young un and I bet Bradley is saving him for the Argentina match in Giants stadium. Altidore, I can assure you is the easiest selection for Bradley after Landon Donovan.
RocketFan007
05-28-2008, 07:36 PM
Altidore has played a ton of matches in the past year, both with his club and country. He's a young un and I bet Bradley is saving him for the Argentina match in Giants stadium. Altidore, I can assure you is the easiest selection for Bradley after Landon Donovan.
Exactly,there are serious concerns about fatigue with Altidore. He hasn't had a break between club and the youth national teams in close to 2 years, so they didn't want him to travel all the way to England for a single friendly. You have to remember he's still only 18, and burn out is extremely common among soccer prodigies his age. That's the last thing we want for the most talented forward the US has ever developed. He'll play against Argentina, you can bet on it. Not to mention he'll have a big part in World Cup qualifying.
Christopher
05-28-2008, 08:16 PM
A big dissapointment for the US, they really should be beating lowly ranked sides like England.
forsythtroy
05-28-2008, 08:50 PM
Man this game showed exactly where the US is in soccer. They were a complete flash in the pan when they had their quarter final appearance in the world cup.
Technically they look terrible. Iberian/ Higher quality SA teams and even some asian teams expose them.
I think their style is actually a lot like England's. The strategy is long passes over the back line and counter attacks.
radapharoah
05-28-2008, 11:57 PM
Man this game showed exactly where the US is in soccer. They were a complete flash in the pan when they had their quarter final appearance in the world cup.
Technically they look terrible. Iberian/ Higher quality SA teams and even some asian teams expose them.
I think their style is actually a lot like England's. The strategy is long passes over the back line and counter attacks.
what else would you have them do? The USA lacks the creativity that comes along with tradition and a passion for the sport. Dont take this as a nock but creativity won’t suddenly appear and solve their problems. They are forced to play this style in order to achieve their optimal results, which are mediocre at best. If the US national team strays from their defensive minded tactics, crosses, and counter attacks they will get their lunch handed to them.
I believe much of this lack of playmaking and creativity comes from the way your young players are trained from an early stage. Kids are put in camps and schools very early on and are OVER coached to the point where their play becomes very mechanical. As a result the USA usually does outstanding in international play sub 20 sub 17 and so forth, because of the technique and hard work that is instilled in them very early on. Teams with great skill and creativity like Brasil (where Im from) usually don’t have the textbook teamwork, technique and hard work that early on. They are allowed more freedom to express their abilities through their play. The Technique is instilled later on.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.