JAG
06-26-2001, 03:44 AM
So many posts on this site either are premised upon or rejected for failing to account for the 'fact' that "the Rockets are looking to make the playoffs next year"...I see this as a ridiculous assumption upon which to base how we build our team for the future, and here's why.
1) Teams that strive for mediocrity often achieve it. Almost every recent championship team has been built upon extremes, either by virtue of the draft or free agency or forced trades, to accumulate superstars..(Lakers, Spurs, Bulls), or, like the Rockets and Pistons, through drafting 1 superstar and surrounding him with great depth and/or role players. At this point in time, the presence of the former (Lakers, Spurs) makes the second method even more difficult. That being said, I feel that moves towards a championship should be of the high-risk, high-payoff type. Bill Walsh, (I know, different sports, but whatever) states that most personel moves in pro sports are made conservatively,therby making most teams gradiate towards the mean....ie, if you seek medicroty, you will often achieve it.
2) Of course the Rockets would like to reach the playoffs next year, but at what cost? Short of signing Webber,any move the Rockets can make this offseason predicated upon that maxim will keep us on the treadmill of fringe teams with no real shot at a championship...Having said that, I'm greatly in favour of making a move (like trading up) and acquiring someone like Brown or Griffen...I agree that high-schoolers are a gamble, but that's what the draft is as a whole...
3) I'm not dismissing the positive P.R. effect that making the playoffs has on potential free agents, but in order for that to be relevant, we'd need to maintain our cap space, therby cutting into moves aimed at "this year"...
4) That's all (!?!?) I have to say right now, and am slowly compiling a list of what I think the Rox should do, so I can post it and satisy my own need to expound my highly debatable wisdom, and excercise your 'skip' button skills...
Sorry for the verbosity, again I blame society..I'll probably contradict everything I've just said next time.
------------------
1) Teams that strive for mediocrity often achieve it. Almost every recent championship team has been built upon extremes, either by virtue of the draft or free agency or forced trades, to accumulate superstars..(Lakers, Spurs, Bulls), or, like the Rockets and Pistons, through drafting 1 superstar and surrounding him with great depth and/or role players. At this point in time, the presence of the former (Lakers, Spurs) makes the second method even more difficult. That being said, I feel that moves towards a championship should be of the high-risk, high-payoff type. Bill Walsh, (I know, different sports, but whatever) states that most personel moves in pro sports are made conservatively,therby making most teams gradiate towards the mean....ie, if you seek medicroty, you will often achieve it.
2) Of course the Rockets would like to reach the playoffs next year, but at what cost? Short of signing Webber,any move the Rockets can make this offseason predicated upon that maxim will keep us on the treadmill of fringe teams with no real shot at a championship...Having said that, I'm greatly in favour of making a move (like trading up) and acquiring someone like Brown or Griffen...I agree that high-schoolers are a gamble, but that's what the draft is as a whole...
3) I'm not dismissing the positive P.R. effect that making the playoffs has on potential free agents, but in order for that to be relevant, we'd need to maintain our cap space, therby cutting into moves aimed at "this year"...
4) That's all (!?!?) I have to say right now, and am slowly compiling a list of what I think the Rox should do, so I can post it and satisy my own need to expound my highly debatable wisdom, and excercise your 'skip' button skills...
Sorry for the verbosity, again I blame society..I'll probably contradict everything I've just said next time.
------------------