1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Report: CIA holds terror suspects in secret prisons

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by mc mark, Nov 2, 2005.

  1. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    NEW YORK (AP) -- The CIA has been hiding and interrogating some of its most important al Qaeda captives at a Soviet-era compound in Eastern Europe, according to U.S. and foreign officials familiar with the arrangement, the Washington Post reported.

    The secret facility is part of a covert prison system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago that at various times has included sites in eight countries, including Thailand, Afghanistan and several democracies in Eastern Europe, as well as a small center at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba, according to current and former intelligence officials and diplomats from three continents, the paper said Tuesday.

    The hidden global internment network is a central element in the CIA's unconventional war on terrorism, the Post said.

    It depends on the cooperation of foreign intelligence services, and on keeping even basic information about the system secret from the public, foreign officials and nearly all members of Congress charged with overseeing the CIA's covert actions.

    The existence and locations of the facilities -- referred to as "black sites" in classified White House, CIA, Justice Department and congressional documents -- are known to only a handful of officials in the United States and, usually, only to the president and a few top intelligence officers in each host country, it said.

    The CIA and the White House, citing national security concerns and the value of the program, have dissuaded Congress from demanding that the agency answer questions in open testimony about the conditions under which captives are held.

    Virtually nothing is known about who is kept in the facilities, what interrogation methods are employed with them, or how decisions are made about whether they should be detained or for how long.

    While the Defense Department has produced volumes of public reports and testimony about its detention practices and rules after the abuse scandals at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison and at Guantanamo Bay, the CIA has not even acknowledged the existence of its black sites.

    To do so, officials familiar with the program told the Post, could open the U.S. government to legal challenges, particularly in foreign courts, and increase the risk of political condemnation at home and abroad.

    But the revelations of widespread prisoner abuse in Afghanistan and Iraq by the U.S. military -- which operates under published rules and transparent oversight of Congress -- have increased concern among lawmakers, foreign governments and human rights groups about the opaque CIA system.

    Those concerns escalated last month, when Vice President Cheney and CIA Director Porter J. Goss asked Congress to exempt CIA employees from legislation already endorsed by 90 senators that would bar cruel and degrading treatment of any prisoner in U.S. custody.

    Although the CIA will not acknowledge details of its system, intelligence officials defend the agency's approach, arguing that the successful defense of the country requires that the agency be empowered to hold and interrogate suspected terrorists for as long as necessary and without restrictions imposed by the U.S. legal system or even by the military tribunals established for prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay.

    The Washington Post said it is not publishing the names of the Eastern European countries involved in the covert program, at the request of senior U.S. officials.

    They argued that the disclosure might disrupt counterterrorism efforts in those countries and elsewhere and could make them targets of possible terrorist retaliation.

    The secret detention system was conceived in the chaotic and anxious first months after the September 11, 2001, attacks, when the working assumption was that a second strike was imminent.

    Since then, the arrangement has been increasingly debated within the CIA, where considerable concern lingers about the legality, morality and practicality of holding even unrepentant terrorists in such isolation and secrecy, perhaps for the duration of their lives.

    Mid-level and senior CIA officers began arguing two years ago that the system was unsustainable and diverted the agency from its unique espionage mission, the Post said.


    http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/02/cia.report.ap/index.html

    Here's the whole WaPo article. It's pretty long and detailed.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/01/AR2005110101644.html
     
    #1 mc mark, Nov 2, 2005
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2005
  2. A-Train

    A-Train Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    38
    ...I'm gonna go to work on the holmes here with a pair of pliers and a blowtorch...you hear me talkin', Al-Qaeda boy?! I ain't through with you by a damn sight, I'm gonna get midevil on yo' ass...
     
  3. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    Vice President for Torture

    Wednesday, October 26, 2005; A18

    VICE PRESIDENT Cheney is aggressively pursuing an initiative that may be unprecedented for an elected official of the executive branch: He is proposing that Congress legally authorize human rights abuses by Americans. "Cruel, inhuman and degrading" treatment of prisoners is banned by an international treaty negotiated by the Reagan administration and ratified by the United States. The State Department annually issues a report criticizing other governments for violating it. Now Mr. Cheney is asking Congress to approve legal language that would allow the CIA to commit such abuses against foreign prisoners it is holding abroad. In other words, this vice president has become an open advocate of torture.

    His position is not just some abstract defense of presidential power. The CIA is holding an unknown number of prisoners in secret detention centers abroad. In violation of the Geneva Conventions, it has refused to register those detainees with the International Red Cross or to allow visits by its inspectors. Its prisoners have "disappeared," like the victims of some dictatorships. The Justice Department and the White House are known to have approved harsh interrogation techniques for some of these people, including "waterboarding," or simulated drowning; mock execution; and the deliberate withholding of pain medication. CIA personnel have been implicated in the deaths during interrogation of at least four Afghan and Iraqi detainees. Official investigations have indicated that some aberrant practices by Army personnel in Iraq originated with the CIA. Yet no CIA personnel have been held accountable for this record, and there has never been a public report on the agency's performance.

    It's not surprising that Mr. Cheney would be at the forefront of an attempt to ratify and legalize this shameful record. The vice president has been a prime mover behind the Bush administration's decision to violate the Geneva Conventions and the U.N. Convention Against Torture and to break with decades of past practice by the U.S. military. These decisions at the top have led to hundreds of documented cases of abuse, torture and homicide in Iraq and Afghanistan. Mr. Cheney's counsel, David S. Addington, was reportedly one of the principal authors of a legal memo justifying the torture of suspects. This summer Mr. Cheney told several Republican senators that President Bush would veto the annual defense spending bill if it contained language prohibiting the use of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by any U.S. personnel.

    The senators ignored Mr. Cheney's threats, and the amendment, sponsored by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), passed this month by a vote of 90 to 9. So now Mr. Cheney is trying to persuade members of a House-Senate conference committee to adopt language that would not just nullify the McCain amendment but would formally adopt cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment as a legal instrument of U.S. policy. The Senate's earlier vote suggests that it will not allow such a betrayal of American values. As for Mr. Cheney: He will be remembered as the vice president who campaigned for torture.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/25/AR2005102501388_pf.html
     
  4. AggieRocket

    AggieRocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    0
    Never thought I would see the day when our VP would be an advocate of torture. If this is true, then I do not care how many people vote for the crazy right-wing faction of the GOP in 2008, 2012, and 2016. Votes do not matter. The nutcase GOP (as opposed to the GOP of Nixon and Reagan) can become the PRI of America. It does not matter. America still lost.
     
  5. HayesStreet

    HayesStreet Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    8,506
    Likes Received:
    181
    Since the article indicates Congress is privy to all of this, I think this is not just a problem with the Executive Branch. Congress is more directly influeced by the populace and should be the focus of any attempt derail this policy.
     
  6. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    And I think they are. Hence the provision in the defense spending bill. It will be telling if the bill is passed and the executive branch carries out its threat of a veto.
     
  7. Zboy

    Zboy Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    27,234
    Likes Received:
    21,956
    This is truly sad. If this thing goes thru and Cheney gets what he wants, it is a disgrace to our country. The few in the adminstration are hijacking the moral values and goodness of America as a whole. :(
     
  8. flamingmoe

    flamingmoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2003
    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    0

    Yes, they should be doing more, but I don't think the exectutive branch gives a damn...

    The guy that is replacing Libby is Addington, who said in a memo:

    "Congress may no more regulate the president’s ability to detain and interrogate enemy combatants than it may regulate his ability to direct troop movements on the battlefield.”
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22665-2004Oct10.html
     
  9. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,031
    Likes Received:
    3,873
    What is happening to my country?



    Policies on Terrorism Suspects Come Under Fire
    Democrats Say CIA's Covert Prisons Hurt U.S. Image; U.N. Official on Torture to Conduct Inquiry

    By Dana Priest and Josh White
    Washington Post Staff Writers
    Thursday, November 3, 2005; A02



    The Bush administration's policies for holding and detaining suspected terrorists came under sharp scrutiny and criticism yesterday after disclosure that the CIA had set up covert prisons in several Eastern European democracies and other countries.

    The U.N. special rapporteur on torture said he would seek more information about the covert prisons, referred to in classified documents as "black sites." Congressional Democrats and human rights groups warned that the secret system would damage the U.S. image overseas.

    House Democrats said they plan to introduce a motion as early as today to endorse language in the defense spending package written by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), which would bar cruel and inhuman treatment of prisoners in U.S. custody, including those in CIA hands. The motion would instruct House conferees to accept McCain's precise measure.

    Rep. John P. Murtha (Pa.), ranking Democrat on the Appropriations defense subcommittee, urged the United States to adopt a doctrine of "no torture, no excuses," and said Congress needs to speak on the issue. "The United States of America and the values we reflect abhor human rights violators and uphold human rights," Murtha said in a statement.

    McCain's amendment was endorsed last month by the Senate, 90 to 9, over the objections of the White House, which said it would restrict the president's ability to protect the country. The House Democrats said they already have 15 GOP supporters for their motion, and Republicans have told the White House they expect it to pass, an Appropriations Committee spokesman said.

    The CIA and the White House are seeking language that would exempt prisoners held by the agency, which would include the 30 or so al Qaeda figures that sources said are being held in the black sites. Neither the White House nor the CIA will officially comment on the secret prison system, but intelligence officials have said in interviews that the arrangement is essential to gaining information about possible terrorist activities.

    The Washington Post reported Wednesday that the CIA's covert detention system has at times established facilities in eight countries, including, among others, Thailand, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Those facilities are now closed. The Post did not publish the names of Eastern European countries involved in the program, at the request of senior U.S. officials. They argued that doing so could damage counterterrorism efforts in those countries and elsewhere, and could lead to retaliation by terrorists.

    The governments of Russia and Bulgaria issued statements saying no such facility existed in their countries, Reuters reported. Thailand also denied hosting such a facility.

    Yesterday, administration officials were buffeted by questions about the black sites.

    "The fact that they are secret, assuming there are such sites, does not mean" torture would be tolerated there, national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley told reporters.

    "Some people say that the test of your principles [is] what you do when no one's looking," he said. "And the president has insisted that whether it is in the public or it is in the private, the same principles will apply and the same principles will be respected. And to the extent people do not meet up, measure up to those principles, there will be accountability and responsibility."

    State Department spokesman Sean McCormack also declined to talk specifically about the sites, saying, "These are difficult issues. And we have ongoing discussions on a variety of different fronts with countries around the world about these issues, because the threat from terrorism . . . is a common threat to democracies and peace-loving nations."

    Human rights groups said the al Qaeda prisoners should be brought to trial, rather than held indefinitely in covert prisons in which they have no recognized legal rights. "We think these people should be prosecuted and punished fully for the murders of thousands of people," said Tom Malinowski of Human Rights Watch. "What is really clear is that this is a dead-end policy and they are close to the dead end."

    John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, has been pushing for more than a year to conduct a review of the CIA's interrogation and detention practices. Yesterday, he lashed out at the administration for not being more forthcoming.

    "They have made it clear that anyone who suggests that oversight is needed should be labeled as unpatriotic," he said.

    Manfred Nowak, the U.N. special rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, said he had heard allegations of secret detention facilities sponsored by the United States, but had not heard of any in Eastern Europe before yesterday.

    "Every secret place of detention is usually a higher risk for ill treatment, that's the danger of secrecy," Nowak said in a telephone interview from Austria, adding that he wants to pursue access to all U.S. detention facilities outside its territory.

    Nowak and his predecessor have been trying to gain access to the U.S. military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay since it opened in early 2002.

    Last week, the Bush administration invited U.N. experts to Guantanamo but offered a one-day visit with no ability to talk to detainees. Nowak said he would not accept because a "guided tour" would not allow him to probe allegations of abuse.

    "I have many allegations that detainees have been abused while in Guantanamo," he said. "If I didn't have plenty of allegations, I wouldn't bother the United States government with trying to visit."

    A senior U.S. official, speaking anonymously yesterday, said the administration is unlikely to budge: "The offer they have is the final offer. We are not prepared to open Guantanamo up to just anyone who wants to come in and talk to detainees."

    Staff writers R. Jeffrey Smith and Jonathan Weisman and researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.

    © 2005 The Washington Post Company


    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/02/AR2005110202988_pf.html
     
  10. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,256
    Likes Received:
    5,220
    Excuse me for not giving sympathy to Al Queda terrorists who want to kill us.

    I hope they are being savagely tortured every minute of every day.
     
  11. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    That's what's happening to your country giff.

    Prety ain't it?
     
  12. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    116
    Good to see that you don't want the United States to sink to the level of our enemies, or at least a Third World Nation.

    T_J, when the Japanese beheaded POWs during World War II, did we respond the same way?
     
  13. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,031
    Likes Received:
    3,873
    ..........
     
  14. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    Evidence points to CIA prisons in Poland, Romania: rights group

    WASHINGTON (AFP) - Flight records and other evidence points to Poland and Romania as countries that allowed their territory to be used by the CIA to hold top suspected Al-Qaeda captives, a Human Rights Watch director said.

    Tom Malinowski, the Washington director of the human rights group, said the evidence, though circumstantial, strongly pointed to Poland and Romania as being among the unidentified eastern European countries referred to in a Washington Post report Wednesday on secret CIA-run prisons.

    Malinowski said sources in Afghanistan told the New York-based rights organization that top Al-Qaeda suspects, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, were moved out of Afghanistan in September 2003.

    The same month, a Boeing 737, leased by the CIA to transport prisoners, departed from Kabul and made stops at remote airfields in Poland and Romania before continuing on to Morocco and then to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, he said.

    "It's a large aircraft so one could imagine a large group of detainees flying on this plane, as against some other smaller executive jets that they used," he told AFP.

    "The fact that it stops in eastern Europe, then Morocco and then Guantanamo suggests different classes of prisoners being deposited in different places," he said.

    In Brussels, a spokesman for HRW's Belgian branch, Jean-Paul Marthoz, said "inquiries up until now seem to indicate that Poland and Romania are the countries that received prisoners held by the CIA."

    He refused to rule out the CIA could be holding "ghost prisoners" elsewhere in eastern Europe.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2005110...l0ZXa2s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlYwM3MDM-
     
  15. basso

    basso Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    29,695
    Likes Received:
    6,386
    how did this information come to light? isn't the very existence of these prisons classified? was there a leak in the CIA? were the operations in question endangered? do we need to appoint a special prosecuter to investigate who at the CIA and in the media is leaking classified information?
     
  16. Uprising

    Uprising Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2000
    Messages:
    42,216
    Likes Received:
    5,394
    Some of you guys act like Torture is a new thing. Like we've never used it, or the gov. has supported it before. This crap has been going on forever, but now suddenly it's bad.
     
  17. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    116
    Got proof?
     
  18. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    ah yes! The "everybody's doing it" defense.
     
  19. mc mark

    mc mark Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    468
    Sure!

    Care to grant Fitzgerald $60 million dollars and an open ended and never ending investigation that will last until the end of the current administration to investigate all aspects of its conduct in regards to the entire episode that is "Jr's little war?"

    Sounds reasonable to me
     
  20. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    116
    Damn straight!!

    My sister was in Washington DC a couple of weeks ago. On the bumper of a car near the White House, she saw the following bumper sticker:

    WOULD SOMEBODY PLEASE GIVE THIS IDIOT A BLOWJOB SO WE CAN IMPEACH HIM??

    :D
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now